USER_AVATAR
BurtJordaan
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 2589
Joined: October 17th, 2009, 2:19 am
Location: South Africa
Blog: View Blog (9)


Archives
- May 2017
Temp file
   May 5th, 2017, 3:49 am
Why is relativity so hard to learn?[10X]
   May 5th, 2017, 12:13 am

+ December 2014
+ April 2014
+ November 2012
+ October 2012
Search Blogs

Advanced search (keyword or author)

I'm trying to understand Lincoln's values for frame C. So I added some values from GrayGhost's Minkowski diagram for essentially the same (ABC) scenario:

Image
With , and :

Lincoln's transformations with Gray's values calculated:












Now to get the time passage of C from 2 to 3, we need to subtract their times:



So the total time experienced by two, inertial observers (as compared to A) is



Lincoln used the reference frame of observer C in 'standard configuration', i.e. frame C's origin is also where A and B's are (Event 1). Gray and me 'resynchronized' the clock of observer C so that it read 2 yrs at event 2, which we called the 'time-handoff', i.e. C sets her clock to momentarily read the same as B's clock, i.e. 2 years.

To show how the C's values on the Minkowski correlate with Lincoln's equations, one can do a Lorentz transform for Event 0 from reference frame A to frame C. Event 0 is where observer C crosses the t=0 line of frame A, so in frame A, Event O sits at (6.928,0) and v= -0.866, i.e. gamma = 2.



This means Gray's clock C is exactly 12 years behind what Lincoln's 'standard configuration' clock would have been, explaining the values for tC shown on the diagram.

Last edited by BurtJordaan on December 23rd, 2014, 12:45 am, edited 4 times in total.
0 Comments Viewed 1547 times

Who is online

Registered users currently online: Google Adsense [Bot], Google [Bot]