Contemporary physicist's high regard for Aristotle's Physics

Discussions on the philosophical foundations, assumptions, and implications of science, including the natural sciences.

Contemporary physicist's high regard for Aristotle's Physics

Postby Marshall on July 24th, 2014, 1:18 am

Interesting upward revision. Aristotle's physics has gotten a bad press---said to be dogmatic, non-empirical, held over as a medieval tradition that modern science had to break away from.

Turns out when looked carefully from a modern perspective, applied to the range of phenomena it was intended to describe/explain, it stacks up pretty well.

Some lessons here about the way scientific progresses.

Re: Contemporary physicist's high regard for Aristotle's Phy

Postby owleye on July 24th, 2014, 11:22 am 

I believe Darwin's Origin of the Species by Natural Selection has a prominent dedication to Aristotle.

I think the reason for the dismissive nature of Aristotle is due to it being considered gospel for nigh a millennia. There's something to this, even with Newton. Thomas Kuhn depicted this idea in his 1962 book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", though I suppose other interpretations than his are possible.

Return to Philosophy of Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests