Wildberger is a crank. It's wonderful that SciAm debunked the article that's going around.
ps -- Let me add some detail.
Wildberger is a finitist. He doesn't believe in the real numbers.
Philosophically that's perfectly ok, but Wildberger's writings are cranky. He thinks he's right and everyone else is wrong. He has a well-deserved reputation as a crank.
He has a system called rational trigonometry, in which he does trig with whole numbers. This work is not cranky or incorrect, but it is irrelevant. Nobody takes it seriously. At best it's an alternative teaching approach and nobody uses it.
Now one day Wildberger says Hey, the Babylonians used my system of rational trigonometry!
What are the odds? The credulous press of course printed the story without questioning it.
I'm grateful to Sci Am and the excellent Evelyn Lamb for publishing a debunking of the latest Wildberger nonsense so quickly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_trigonometryhttp://goodmath.scientopia.org/2007/10/ ... s-of-math/