A question about Planck length and Planck time

Discussions concerned with knowledge of measurement, properties, and relations quantities, theoretical or applied.

A question about Planck length and Planck time

Postby curiosity on October 13th, 2016, 9:46 pm 

If I convert one second of sidereal time into Planck time, then convert 299 792 458 meters into Planck length, why dont I get identical answers? There are clocks now, that are so accurate, that one meter of length can be given as a time (when using the speed of light as a common denominator.) So why don't the numbers add up, when the distance that light travels in one second is calculated in planck units ? I Have always been under the impression that the laws of physics hold true, right down to the Planck length, which is obviously wrong. Could somebody clarify this problem for me? If one Planck length is the distance light travels in one Planck time, surely
the total units in each measurement should be the same?
curiosity
Member
 
Posts: 352
Joined: 19 Jul 2012


Re: A question about Planck length and Planck time

Postby BioWizard on October 13th, 2016, 9:50 pm 

Mind showing us your calculations?
User avatar
BioWizard
Forum Administrator
 
Posts: 12685
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Location: United States
Blog: View Blog (3)


Re: Whine or Wiki?

Postby Faradave on October 13th, 2016, 10:20 pm 

curiosity wrote:one Planck length is the distance light travels in one Planck time

1 Planck length is 1.616199 x 10-35 meters.
1 Planck time is 5.39116 x 10-44 seconds.

Dividing the two gets you 0.2998 x 109 m/s or about 300,000 km/sec. (i.e. c).
You're off to a good start!
c should be 1 in Planck units, right?
1 ÷ 1 = 1. It's intended to make things easier!
User avatar
Faradave
Active Member
 
Posts: 1611
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Location: Times Square (T2)



Return to Mathematics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests