ralfcis » 10 Mar 2017, 22:07 wrote:Ok as we go to an even more rarified medium, from glass to air to helium to hydrogen to partial vacuum, all the while getting closer and closer to the permittivity and permeability values of space, at what point is the contained medium no longer able to have a speed?
ralfcis » March 10th, 2017, 3:29 pm wrote:That's the question, can a vacuum have a speed. A vacuum is defined as emptiness so can something that is nothing be moving. But as I corrected the question, can a substance (space) that is just an electromagnetic medium move if it's sealed or does the external electromagnetic medium (space) ignore the seal and the two become one. My last question is when do the two become one if you have initially filled the tube with air and it slowly leaks out until there is a vacuum inside the tube. So it goes from the air in the tube having a speed to the space in the tube not having a speed, it just fixes to the background space and the tube effectively disappears or at least its sealed ends do.
Dave_O wrote:So, if that tube is a Spaceship, moving at say 50% the Speed of Light, the sound inside would pretty much still travel inside at the speed of sound.
Jorrie wrote:I think you have already read the threads where Dave's premises were falsified, so we are not going there again.
ralfcis » 10 Mar 2017, 23:05 wrote: Both of you are aging at the same rate whether you're moving relative to each other or stationary. But if your car is moving relatively to them and your car comes to a stop, you will age slower than them in the time between when you come to a stop and they see that you have stopped.
Dave_Oblad » 11 Mar 2017, 01:18 wrote:Jorrie wrote:I think you have already read the threads where Dave's premises were falsified, so we are not going there again.
Also note that Jorrie doesn't see the difference between something being falsified vs not agreeing with the status quo. Meaning.. if one doesn't agree with Relativity then they are automatically falsified in his view.
ralfcis » 11 Mar 2017, 13:37 wrote:Since I can't infer your silence as agreement to what I'm about to say, I'm going to number the revelations and I'd like a list of yays or nays or not quites to each number.
ralfcis » March 11th, 2017, 6:55 am wrote:I''m in Canada. Up here it's 20 below and nothing but snow.
Yes, the same. I'm just an amateur so I often get in trouble for not knowing terms.
Jorrie wrote:AFAIK, you still did not give us your interpretation of his second, simple one-way method. BTW, this type test has been done with a real atomic clock.
Jorrie wrote:Attaching any speed to space, even zero, is nonsensical.
Dave_Oblad » 11 Mar 2017, 23:34 wrote:Since Velocity is always Relative to something and Velocity Differentials are very different based on distance separation of test cases.. does this qualify that Vacuums (Space), separated by distances, can have their own private differential velocities?
Jorrie wrote:Co-moving means astronomers on that galaxy would observe isotropic CMB radiation, on average.
Wiki wrote:The high degree of uniformity throughout the observable universe and its faint but measured anisotropy lend strong support for the Big Bang model in general and the ΛCDM ("Lambda Cold Dark Matter") model in particular.
Dave_Oblad » 12 Mar 2017, 15:03 wrote:By CMB radiation, are we talking signal strength or Doppler shift. By Doppler, the CMB is far from being isotropic. It is anisotropic by definition.
Perhaps it's best to let that thread remain a shining example of how a legitimate challenge is met with obfuscations, ad hominem slurs, and finally.. censorship via lockout.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests