ralfcis » 10 Mar 2017, 21:56 wrote:What does that mean and is there a missing list of caveats, conditions and disclaimers that go with that statement?
ralfcis » March 11th, 2017, 6:49 am wrote:Well why didn't you say so, that was a fantastic, clear, concise explanation. You're firing on all cylinders lately in my book. I'm sure it was what Faradave meant to say but honestly I don't absorb information regurgitation very well, makes me very unpopular on physics forums.
ralfcis » 12 Mar 2017, 13:52 wrote:So I guess all that's left is to explain this
in terms of Jorrie's explanation in this thread.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests