Now if one treats Reality as granular at the Planck length (composed of 3D cells) grown on the surface of a 4D HyperSphere, then Time and the Expansion of the Universe are the same thing.
“The rule is simple: "New (SpaceTime) cells are grown on any surface that is exposed".
That surface being the 4D outer surface.
Next, we find that Matter, at the smallest scales, can have no Momentum.
How does a particle know, from Planck Interval to Interval, how fast it was Moving and what Direction?
Each new layer of SpaceTime and embedded Matter Geometry is being Grown on the exposed surface at the Speed of Light.
This force several things to be True:
1.Time (as we experience it) has an Arrow
2. Matter cannot propagate Laterally faster than New Surface Cells are being added.
3.New Cells must have compatible Scale to previous Cells where Matter is present.
4. SpaceTime cells must have variable Scale, thus the Planck Length is not a fixed size.
5. The New Cell size must have no sharp transitions between adjacent Cells
Thus the Planck Length is a constant, when we consider the Speed of Light as defined by Distance and Time, but the Planck Length near a Black Hole is radically smaller than the Planck Length within a deep Void.
So, if you start with a point for Volume and you increase the size of that point every Planck Interval, then how big can a point get volume wise? A really huge point? What does that even mean?
“So, if you start with a point for Volume and you increase the size of that point every Planck Interval, then how big can a point get volume wise? A really huge point? What does that even mean?”
“There are many 3D shapes that fit together without leaving any Gaps.”
“Thus I had already suggested the Growth (expansion) of New Volume Cells, that occur on the exposed surface of this growing Geometry, constitutes the Expansion of the Universe.”
“The problem now is we have a Physical Center to the Universe and our Cosmic View precludes such an obvious center.”
“So if we elevate to the next Dimension and call Time the 4th Dimension, then we have a Growing Hyper Volume and the direction towards the True Center of the Universe is the direction pointing towards Yesterday.”
“Once one realizes this simple Geometry, then one can see the SURFACE of such a construct is 3D.”
“But if we have an Arrow of Time, this describes the simple fact that we must only Exist on the Expanding 3D Surface of such a growing 4D HyperVolumetric construction.”
Are we on the same page thus far?
“First, why use Spheres? Other Geometries fit together without Gaps. Unless you need those Gaps, as you appear to do so, by suggesting those gaps are filled with Energy.”
“It's this stage that is just an Hypothesis, without a definition for Energy.”
doesn't that imply a growing Planck Length Scale?
“Also, for each Generation of surface Spheres being Grown.”
“is new Energy auto filled into the new Gaps or does that energy bleed in from earlier Gaps into later Gaps?”
“And can one define the nature of said Energy?”
“Again, from such a Model, we would see all Galaxies moving away from a Central Location,”
“this expansion by adding new Spheres would be rather disruptive to any structure built into this fabric,”
“unless said structure also grew with each new layer.”
“Or one adopts the stance that where Matter exists, the New Sphere Size being grown…”
“the Planck Length is a Variable.”
“And so far, we haven't talked about the contents of what's Inside said Spheres.”
“What the surface of said Spheres is composed of..”
“and a Sphere would have an infinite number of surface vertices or.. it wouldn't be a Sphere.. it would be a Specific Geometry.. such as: A Cube? A Tetrahedron? A Octahedron? A Dodecahedron? (etc)”
“Hopefully, I persuaded you away from Spheres.. because they require infinite Resolution to define a Surface.”
“And if all Spheres are the same size, it would look like a bag of marbles (without the bag.. lol).”
“But let's make it a bit more Simple and deal with a a Flat 2D Universe populated with Flat Landers.”
“My 3D view of him has been captured at a precise Time to show his flat front surface to me.”
“His Universe is Expanding in the direction towards the Camera.”
“Obviously, he cannot see the Empty Void ahead of him, on this Growing "Front" Side,”
“Also note that if he rolled his circle on the ground, that the Axis of Rotation would be in the direction of "Time".”
“that it is likely that some (if not all) particles also rotate around the Axis of "Time"?”
“They can't exist unless new surface SpaceTime is always provided for their History to project new placement Geometry.”
“To get more freedom, we require the Geometry of additional History layers of Time.”
“…and new Matter is always being Created onto the next blank Surface as an ongoing Change in Geometry as structure propagated from the past.”
“As you have already agreed, Time is Growth..”
“without New SpaceTime Growth.. Time would Stop.”
“Energy is not some intangible substance but rather Energy is Geometry.”
“Note: this could represent the Planck Scale Quantum or it could Represent the Large Scale Metric..”
Lot's more to say.. but I have to leave for awhile..

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests