More specifically the term geometrodynamics is associated with Wheeler’s speculation that all of physics might fundamentally be described by configurations of gravity coupled to other fields, notably the field of electromagnetism, but without any matter: one can see that certain spacetimes without any matter content but with certain nontrivial topology may locally effectively look as if they contained massive and possibly charged bodies.
EasternWind » September 26th, 2016, 5:08 am wrote:It is only necessary to perceive that there is something; matter, energy, space (and therefor time). I don't see why "reality" needs to be actually "real."
Even with today's technology, playing a video game, sometimes we really feel we are in that "universe." We feel space, speed, and sometimes even a bit of mass and energy.
Now I am not saying "we" are imaginary. I am saying everything else, could simply be things we perceive are there - with all the laws of physics, etc. We are the ones perceiving it.
mahesh » September 26th, 2016, 10:17 am wrote:1) Why initial expansion of world after bing-bang was so swift?
Answer:- Accumulated gravitational & electromagnetic field create space. As all matter in universe is accumulated at very small point in vacuum before big-bang. So, whole field in the universe also get accumulated at very small point. So, when big-bang happen initial expansion of particle may happens through vacuum, not through space. So, no physics laws or mathematics get applied to this expansion, this will just create huge space immediately with matter. This may be reason for early abnormal expansion of universe. This is because all laws of physics consider motion through space not through vacuum.
mahesh » 02 Nov 2016, 11:38 wrote:http://vixra.org/pdf/1302.0127v1.pdf by Hans W Giertz &
http://phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists ... -seen.html
these paper proves that photon is moving with velocity C but photon is not a dead horse as require by SR. It is active. It is internally active & externally active. It can interact with other photon to create photonic molecule.
This is against Special theory of relativity.
because any system moving with velocity C then any activity in that system is not possible to see by observer at rest because time for that system t= infinity or 1/0 or stop for observer at rest.
(& as for any observer velocity of light is always C by SR, All photons must be inactive.)
This clearly experimentally proved that SR is wrong. As active photon is not possible in SR.
4) Since this is a Science subforum any Theory to be considered appropriate should first recover prior art (reproduce the successful predictions of established theory where it applies) and secondly should predict some new phenomenon by which it can be tested.
mahesh » June 13th, 2016, 6:04 am wrote:Something beautiful is happening in physics. It is experimentally proved that universe is expanding at faster rate than GR predicted & LHC may find massive particle beyond standard model of physics. Means, we cannot explain even 5% of known matter correctly. We do not know, what is dark matter?
Now, if I proved that SR is mathematically wrong then we have to write down whole physics again. Read paper on web site http://www.maheshkhati.com which gives answer to some of these problems (or the possible way to find the solution of these problems).
Now, I start discussion by placing my 1st mathematics of 1st chapter of my paper which mathematically proved that SR is wrong. SR gives much important to observer & only kinematics (or state of motion) relative to observer changes time, mass & space. This gives result that applied force is less than acting force in SR. This additional force does not obey the Pythagoras theorem separately. Details are given in the paper.
Force without acceleration in S.R.
& acceleration without force in S.R.
& applied force is less than acting force in S.R.
STEP 1:-This problem can easily be understood by following paradox.
{Before starting this paradox, I want to put some relativity formulae’s
In any frame, for force in X-direction by S.R.
So, after differentiation
We know,
So, after differentiation
from (A) & (B)
So,
Now, Paradox:-
On frictionless platform, object is moving with constant velocity in X-direction & only magnetic force is acting in Y-direction & there is acceleration in Y-direction only with velocity
If we apply eq(1) to this case then result will be
as this force is form due to [/itex] only
Mean’s even there is no magnetic force acting on object from outside in x-direction & no then also above force will act on object in +ve direction of x-axis due to
Important point (1):-
Mean’s applied magnetic force on object in X-direction is 0 & acting force in X-direction is
or
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STEP 2:-Now, Force acting in X-direction is
Now, after this happen, very small magnetic force of same intensity
-fx =- or start acting on object in direction opposite to above force (but velocity is still positive ) & cancel that above force.
Mean’s equation (1) becomes
Or
(Here as )
Mean’s
Mean’s there must be acceleration in –ve X-direction to fulfil above equation of S.R.
Now, see above equation carefully, it is of nature
Important point (2):- Mean’s applied magnetic force on object in X-direction is -fx & acting force in X-direction is or 0.
Here, resultant force in X-direction is zero but there is acceleration.
STEP3:- same things happen for +ve force in X-direction (for less than or more)
Now, I am generalising above result.
This clearly shows that when we apply any magnetic force (Fmx) in X-direction on the object, actual force acting on object is more & that quantity is (Fmx+)
Similarly,
If we apply any magnetic force (Fmy) in Y-direction on the object then actual force acting on object is more & that quantity is (Fmy+)
This is completely complicated results, which says that applied force & acting forces on objects are different in S.R.
STEP4:- Force does work, consume energy, gain energy & we must know that energy cannot be created. It can be transferred only:-
From above setup it must be clear that energy get transfer from magnet to object but if applied force is less than acting force then energy gain by object will be more than energy loose by the magnet. Means due to more work done by more force for same displacement, more energy get generated.
HERE, more energy(& force) is the problem.
Where does this additional energy (& force) comes from?
Some says that this is apparent force but it is not because it is the part of acting force.
This clearly shows that something is seriously wrong in Special theory of relativity. There are some additional mathematics which proves SR wrong are also given in chapter 1.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests