Despite the fact that Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity is accepted with an almost religious fervor by the whole scientific establishment there is little if any experimental evidence that can be used to conclusively verify its validity. Certainly the equations of relativity fit the experimental measurements perfectly. What is not valid is the natural philosophy of relativity’s explanation of what is really going on with reality.
Special Relativity offers a way to interpret experimental results that is consistent with its fundamental assumptions. However, by eliminating the assumptions of relativity the same experimental results can be explained equally as well if not better.
The theory of Special Relativity is derived from four basic fundamental assumptions.
1. Matter originally came from energy within the fundamental entity of spacetime. Einstein discarded aether as unneeded and then realized that he wanted to replace it with a far more complex structure called spacetime.
2. The speed of light is constant in all ref . . .
The fact that the CBR is blue shifted in the direction of Leo and red shifted in the opposite direction seems to be quite conclusive proof that the solar system is moving through this absolute photon reference frame at approximately 375 km/sec.
What is it about SR that is so psychologically repulsive to the fringe physicist? We may never know!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests