Accelerators  as a scientific  Sisyphus stone / by Socratus/

This is not an everything goes forum, but rather a place to ask questions and request help for developing your ideas.

Accelerators  as a scientific  Sisyphus stone / by Socratus/

Postby socrat44 on August 20th, 2017, 2:04 am 

  Accelerators  as a scientific  Sisyphus stone.  / by Israel Socratus /
Accelerators  are Useless and produce Nothing for humankind.
======.
In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms,
bombarding them with high energy a- particles.
This idea helped him to understand the structure of atom.
But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to physicists
to enlarge the energy of bombarding  the target.
And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of particles.
And they began to bomb micro particles in the  vacuum,  in hoping
to understand their inner structure. And they were surprised with
the results of this bombing. Several hundreds of completely new
strange particles appeared. They lived a very little  time and do not
relate to our world. Our Earth needs electron and proton to create atom.
But this was forgotten.
What God carefully created, it is destroyed in accelerators.
And they are proud of that. They say: we study the inner structure
of the particles. The clever and artful Devil is glad. He again has deceived man.
Physicist think, that an accelerator – is first of all the presence of huge energy.
And the Devil laughs. He knows, that accelerator – is first of all is the Vacuum.
But this, he has withhold from man.
He has not explained that the Vacuum is infinite and inexhaustible.
And in infinite vacuum  is contained an infinite variety of particles.
And by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and sphinxes.
But my God, save us from their presence on Earth.
========= .. ========.
Rutherford was right.
His followers are mistaken.
Why?
Imagine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
For this purpose I shall dig out a hole of 1 meter width and 1,20 m depth.
It is normal.
But if to plant a small apple- tree,  I shall begin to dig out a hole
  with 100  meters size and depth, will you call me a normal man?
========== .. ===============.
Imagine a man who breaks watches on the wall.
And then he tries to understand the mechanism of the watches
by thrown cogwheels, springs and small screws.
Does he have many chances to success ?
As many as the scientists have who trys to understand
the inner structure of electron by breaking them into accelerators.
If not take into account the initial conditions of Genesis,
the fantasies of the scientists may be unlimited.
========== . ======== .
The Nature works very economical.
For example, biologists know 100 ( hundred ) kinds of
amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty) kinds of amino acids
are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which all
different cells created on our planet. What are about another
80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evolution.
The physicists found many ( 1000 ) new elementary particles in
accelerators. But we need only one ( 1) electron and one (1 )
proton to create first atom, to begin to create the Nature.
All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girlfriends – antiparticles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evolution.
===========..
The critical density of matter in the whole universe is very small
( approximately 10-26 kg/m3 )  and therefore the universe is not ''closed''
it is ''open'' -- infinite and   all the masses of galaxies exist in this infinite Vacuum.
So, instead of understand what Vacuum is,  instead to understand
''Where did electron and proton come from?''  the physicists break them in the
pieces, trying to understand their inner structure.
This is scientific Sisyphus work. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_a ... le_physics  
====================.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik   Socratus.
========================.
.
socrat44
Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015


Re: Accelerators  as a scientific  Sisyphus stone / by Socra

Postby socrat44 on August 20th, 2017, 9:29 am 

Somebody wrote:
''There are over 30,000 particle accelerators all over the world,
so what are they used for? ''
====
The higher  will climb Sisyphus the stone the  higher potential energy
the stone will have and then faster it will roll  down.
And if the speed of stone will be near to speed of quantum of light and
it meets another stone   then  we will have approximately  LHC effect.
Why ''approximately'' ?
We need vacuum in order to LHC effect be punctual.
====================  .
socrat44
Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015


Re: Accelerators  as a scientific  Sisyphus stone / by Socra

Postby Eclogite on August 21st, 2017, 1:50 am 

Once upon a time there was a skilled writer and deep thinker. This man reached a point where, in the recesses of his thinking, he thought he espied a light, flickering in the depths of a dark forest. He pursued this light, sometimes losing it for a moment, or longer, then seemingly closing on it.

At last he felt he had seen enough and understood enough to share this light with his fellows. So, he told them a tale, as he thought, of misguided angst and bombastic arrogance. He employed metaphor and hyperbole and simile and other tools of rhetoric, woven into a tapestry of doubt and condemnation.

Meanwhile, as his tale went largely unregarded, others were exploring the forest from the outside in, harvesting the trees for timber, from which they constructed comfortable homes, bridges that aided communication, pit props that facilitated mining, and all manner of useful and productive things.

The wise man continued to tell his disaffected tale to no one, mistaking the echo from the blank wall of indifference for a supporting voice. Thus we see that even wisdom has its limits. The world turned.
Eclogite
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 1388
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Location: Around and about


Re: Accelerators  as a scientific  Sisyphus stone / by Socra

Postby socrat44 on August 21st, 2017, 2:56 am 

Eclogite » August 21st, 2017, 1:50 am wrote:Once upon a time there was a skilled writer and deep thinker. This man reached a point where, in the recesses of his thinking, he thought he espied a light, flickering in the depths of a dark forest. He pursued this light, sometimes losing it for a moment, or longer, then seemingly closing on it.

At last he felt he had seen enough and understood enough to share this light with his fellows. So, he told them a tale, as he thought, of misguided angst and bombastic arrogance. He employed metaphor and hyperbole and simile and other tools of rhetoric, woven into a tapestry of doubt and condemnation.

Meanwhile, as his tale went largely unregarded, others were exploring the forest from the outside in, harvesting the trees for timber, from which they constructed comfortable homes, bridges that aided communication, pit props that facilitated mining, and all manner of useful and productive things.

The wise man continued to tell his disaffected tale to no one, mistaking the echo from the blank wall of indifference for a supporting voice. Thus we see that even wisdom has its limits. The world turned.


Thank you for your story.
My conclusion
===
Once upon a time there was a skilled writer and deep thinker by name Einstein.
This man said sadly :
‘' All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken. ‘'
He thought a little and continued:
“One thing I have learned in a long life:
that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive
and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have.”

Meanwhile, others were exploring physics and constructed many
different kinds of useful and productive things.

The wise Einstein wanted to know what quantum of light is,
but today ''every Tom, Dick and Harry'' is interesting in another
subjects.
Without light/ quantum of light there isn't life on the Earth,
but Tom, Dick and Harry '‘ the brightest and best- educated scientists’'
work very hard to develop the  ''string theory'' the ''dark matter and energy''
the ''big bang'', ''many dimensions'', to create more powerful LHC.

And nobody gives answer: what quantum of light is.
It is a pity to see that wisdom of '‘ the brightest and best- educated scientists’' has its limits.
=======================================.
socrat44
Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015



Return to Personal Theories

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests