## SRT  (an another interpretation)

This is not an everything goes forum, but rather a place to ask questions and request help for developing your ideas.

### SRT  (an another interpretation)

SRT  (an another interpretation)
=============
One postulate of SRT says:
the speed of quantum of light in vacuum is constant (c=1)

Another postulate of SRT says:
all movements (including the constant speed of quantum of light)
are relative motions in the respect to an absolute aether  medium T=0K.

It is possible if constant speed of quantum of light is minimal and
quantum of light can have speed faster than minimal (c>1).
(tachyon solution).

Third  postulate says:
the speed of quantum of light is independent of its source.

It is possible only if the source of its speed is self-quantum action (h or  h/2pi).

==========================================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

Sorry, I want to rewrite my post.
================
1. Light quant move trough an  absolute  aether  medium: T=0K.
a) this was  Maxwell and Lorenz point of view.
b) Minkowski hid this absolute  aether  medium into mathematical unity
of 4D spacetime  (an other name is : negative -2D Pseudo-Euclidian space)

2)  the speed of quantum of light in zero vacuum (T=0K) is constant (c=1)

3) all movements (including the constant speed of quantum of light)
are relative motions in the respect to an absolute aether  medium T=0K.

4) It is possible if constant speed of quantum of light is minimal and
quantum of light can have speed faster than minimal (c>1).
(tachyon solution).

5) the speed of quantum of light is independent of its source.
It is possible only if the source of its speed is self-quantum action (h or  h/2pi).
The result of  self-quantum action  is described  by Lorenz  transformations.
========================================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

I'm starting to appreciate the futility of words. The Oz syndrome, a sign at work, "Eschew Obfuscation". Haiku, words stream, a stream . . . to consciousness.
ralfcis
Member

Posts: 860
Joined: 19 Jun 2013

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

By the way,
Minkowski 4D spacetime is as absolute reference frame as the aether medium.

The views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil
of experimental physics, and therein lies their strength. They are radical. Henceforth,
space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows,
and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.
Minkowski.       (Sep 21, 1908)

Then, why do we need complex mathematical equations
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space)   to explain that 2+2=4,
when  Minkowski 4D absolute spacetime  is a simple T=0K ?
=========================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

1) We live on planet Earth therefore when we say time it must mean gravity-time.
Gravity-time depends on its  masses and speed.
Without gravity-masses we don't have time.
SRT is theory without gravity, without gravity-mass therefore it can seem  that
SRT is a timeless theory.

2)  But  indeed, SRT does speak about a time.
It can mean that the subject of SRT is not gravity-time, but time that belongs to the
individual quantum particles. These  quantum particles  have  no gravity-mass, but
they  have pure energy-mass. And this pure energy mass of quantum particles
depend on their  own speed/ spin. (h or h/2pi).
Different value of spin of quantum particles create their  individual  mass and energy-time.

=============================================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

Was Einstein wrong?
Paul Davies 2003:
The idea of a variable speed of light, championed
by an angry young scientist, could one day topple Einstein's theory of relativity.
Einstein's famous equation E=mc^2 is the only scientific formula
known to just about everyone. The "c" here stands for the speed of light.
It is one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is it?
In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the speed of light
might not be constant at all. Shock, horror!
Does this mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magaz ... teinwrong/
=====================================

socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

In 1908 Minkowski showed that everything that happened in SRT took
place in an absolute 4-dimensions spacetime. This solution was adopted
by all scientific community.
However, if SRT explains some real quantum action, then the mathematical absolute
4-dimensions spacetime also must be some real absolute reference frame,
but in the books about SRT it is impossible to find the real
(not mathematical) image of 4-dimensions spacetime.
=======================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

A strange new world of light.
Date:
November 2, 2017
Source:
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences

There's nothing new thing under the sun -- except maybe light itself.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 141857.htm
=============================================================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

SRT: Einstein's two  postulates.    / other  interpretation/

a)  The laws of physics are the same in all material (!)  inertial reference frame:
/ Galileo transformations./
All material (!) inertial frames of reference are approximately (!) inertial
reference frame.

b)  The speed of light in vacuum's constant / absolute continuum (T=0K)  has
constant speed: c=1

c) All  laws of physics change when quantum particles transfer from absolute
vacuum continuum (T=0K) to inertial reference frames.  / Lorenz transformations./
=====================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

socrat44 » November 25th, 2017, 9:41 am wrote:    SRT: Einstein's two  postulates.    / other  interpretation/

a)  The laws of physics are the same in all material (!)  inertial reference frame:
/ Galileo transformations./
All material (!) inertial frames of reference are approximately (!) inertial
reference frame.

b)  The speed of light in vacuum's constant / absolute continuum (T=0K)  has
constant speed: c=1

c) All  laws of physics change when quantum particles transfer from absolute
vacuum continuum (T=0K) to inertial reference frames.  / Lorenz transformations./
=====================

SRT: Einstein's two  postulates.    / other  interpretation /

a)  The laws of physics are the same in all material (!)  inertial reference frame:
/ Galileo transformations./
All material (!) inertial frames of reference (stars, planets ) are approximately (!)
inertial reference frame.

b)  The speed of quantum of light in vacuum's constant / absolute continuum
(T=0K)  has constant speed: c=1 and therefore all  laws of physics change
when quantum particles transfer from absolute vacuum continuum (T=0K)
to inertial reference frames (planets . . . ) or vice versa: from planets to vacuum.
/ Lorenz transformations./
=====================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015

### Re: SRT  (an another interpretation)

a) SRT describes physics in the absence of gravity,
It means that stars, planets, galaxies cannot be SRT subjects.
It means that SRT is interesting in situation  around gravity-masses.
And the ''object''  that surrounds    all billions and billions galaxies.
is an absolute , infinite, eternal Minkowski 4D spacetime - ''space fabric'' .

b ) All material  inertial reference frame like stars, planets, galaxies  . . .
are approximately inertial systems.
The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frame
( Galileo transformations  ) and therefore  all different observers
on different inertial  reference frame (planets) will see  that the speed of quantum of light
as constant,  independently of who measures this speed and how fast the observers move
with  respect to the absolute , infinite  ''space fabric'' .

c) All physical laws change when we try to unite inertial and absolute references frame.

============================
socrat44
Member

Posts: 232
Joined: 12 Dec 2015