BadgerJelly:
Ok, sure: First off, from a common-sensical approach, we know that human beings have evolved trough history, and, along with that evolution, we have developed uniquely human consciousness, of course.
Ok, so we also know, from a common-sensical approach, that there exists such a thing as “pictorial cognition,” along with an understanding of basic, common-sensical, cognitive processes, of course, and I, especially, know this fact, because I was kicked out of school in 10th grade, and went out into reality and “saw” all these things for myself, yes – saw, with my eyes, and – of course, while forming “understandings” - of REALITY, within my mind.
Ok, so because I went out into reality, I saw this: There exists, all around us, the existence of reality, evident – self evident, manifestations of the existence of reality, and which exists as an applied “function” of a basic, universally applicable, mathematical formula, which is: matter and motion (forces), things (three dimensional tangible form masses) and non-things (forces that act upon the masses), nouns (perceivable three dimensional tangible form nouns/masses) and verbs (perceivable four dimensional articulation of movement between the three dimensional tangible form masses, made manifest as a function of time), these are all absolutely “self evident facts,” of course.
Ok, so then, when we apply our formed understanding of what we can see in reality – of REALITY, we can also see that there exists a “syntax” that defines the purposeful creation of reality. And, in simple applications, such as the when we look at a crystal, and/or a diamond, and, then – as we perceive the crystal and/or diamond, we can see that the diamond is made of the same, exact, primary components as a lump of coal, but – when the primary components are “rearranged” - into a crystalline latticework, the primary components form a structure which becomes much more powerful, than when the primary components are simply “thrown together” in a haphazard manner.
And such as this:
https://www.123rf.com/photo_18316639_hi ... ttice.htmlWhich we can simply see with our eyes, of course.
Now, also of course, there exits a similar applied function which is not so easily seen, but which is perceivable, which is this:
https://hermetic.com/godwin/kepler-and- ... he-spheresOk, so now that we know that we can become aware of reality, and its applied functions, to become more “powerful,” and/or how when nature takes some primary components, and purposefully rearranges them, nature forms more “powerful structures,” we can know – because of consciousness, that when we human beings imitate our understandings of reality, we can also become capable of taking some primary components and then “rearranging” them, to become capable of becoming more powerful, and/or become capable of “forming” more powerful “structure,” and such as this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_(construction)
Ok, so now because I did learn everything only through my direct experiencing of reality, I know there are some other things that I did come to an understanding of. Such as the fact that I know, that when I exposed myself to a chaotic environment, such as this:
https://www.reference.com/science/effec ... 3f553df7c7My exposure to that environment caused me to experience a “disturbance” within my mind, and central nervous system, and which caused me to move in a direction away from, it, and – too, I knew, from my exposure to reality, that that – what I just provided a link to, is the, “static,” visual representation of this:
https://reinardtvanrensburg.wordpress.c ... -pictures/And/or chaos, and – exactly because I did experience the actual function in reality, I did also learn that that – actual pictorial sequence, does actually occur EXACTLY as it is being pictorially represented.
And/or the fact that I did experience a crash in reality, and the actual crash is always preceded by a period of “loosing control,” of my “harmonious movement” and/or harmonious existence within four dimensional reality, and – then, the “harmony” turns into “chaos,” and – THEN, the “pain” ALWAYS follows, and sometimes even death.
Ok, so too I have experienced ONLY “reality” out in reality, and/or this:
https://www.kidsdiscover.com/parentreso ... in-nature/And/or the simple function of reality, and/or the “patterns” that define reality, and/of course, which is EXTENDING beyond this:
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/72690981459203826/Ok, so in other words, because I am alive, and I did ONLY learn EVERYTHING only through my exposure to reality, because – remember, it would be literally IMPOSSIBLE any other way, because I was kicked out of school in the 10th grade, I did learn – first hand, that when I was a young child I could ”see” ONLY the “three dimensional tangible form things” that surround us in our daily existence, and/or the “nouns” - “three dimensional masses,” that surround us in our daily existence, and then I began to realize, as I grew older – and developed my consciousness, that I could “see” BEYOND a simple three dimensional thing out in reality, and/or a single point within space/time, and then I began to realize that when I did become capable of “seeing” PAST a single “thing” within reality, and/or past a single point within simultaneously relative space/time, I was also – and simultaneously, beginning to develop my uniquely human consciousness, and/or, as you explained:
“Ironically you seem to be completely unable to engage on an empathic level with who you are speaking to. You are locked up and shut off. You exhibit sociopathic tendencies by showing that you simply cannot communicate on the most basic human level.”'
EMPATHY.
Because, this is what I did realize, that when I was young, very young, I could only “see,” basically, “two dimensionally,” and/or “one dimensionally,” and/or: “ME,” and nothing else, and/or no one else, either, and/or care for that matter – because I was just a “child.”
Ok, so this is what I realized: As a young child I could only “see” things, including other human beings, in addition, when I was kicked out of the first school I went to, I did go to a second school (but I didn't have, really, any classes – I just ran), and, when I got there I realized something, and remembering saying to myself:”Hey the 'people' at this school are all only 'like' the people in the first school, physically – and emotionally, basically, but with slight variations, but of the same basic themes,” and then I remember becoming more aware of my classmates, and fellow human beings as well, as I developed the ability to “see” literally past the single point of myself, and began to experience the “collective consciousness of mankind,” and/or experience “empathy,” of course.
Ok, so this is what I realized: When I was young I simply didn't posses the ability to understand all of simultaneously relative reality, and/or see past a single point while at any one point within space/time, and – again, which – I realized, is simply the single point of “myself,” but, I remember also being able to do things, like “see” someone get “hit in the face,” and then say, in words:”Wow – THAT must have 'hurt,” but – I realized, that when I said those words, and when I “saw” that person “get hit in the face,” when I was a young child, and then said the words:”Wow – that must have hurt,” it was kind of like I could “see” the person get hit in the face, and – then, “access my memory banks,“ and – then, “remember” myself “getting hit in the face,” and/or “crashing on my bike,” and – THEN, I could “feel the pain of being hit in the face,” and then experience:
“Ironically you seem to be completely unable to engage on an empathic level with who you are speaking to. You are locked up and shut off. You exhibit sociopathic tendencies by showing that you simply cannot communicate on the most basic human level.”'
But then, as I grew OUT of adolescence, and began to mature into an adult, I began to become aware of something changing, something becoming more “powerful,” and more powerful, as I was experiencing reality more, and more, and more, and which was this: I began to realize that, as I was experiencing that EXACT same phenomenon that I just described, where I would “see” someone “get hit in the face,” and/or someone experience “pain,” and/or someone being exposed to “chaos,” I would “see” them being exposed to that phenomenon, with my “eyes,” and – then, as I “saw” the other human being being forced to be exposed to that: chaos – discord – pain – suffering – salt – death, I would become capable of “feeling,” in real time, their: pain – etc, and, of course, also realized, that the literal definition of empathy is, simply, the neurophysiological capability to “see” past a single point in space/time, while at any one point within space/time, and which is also a neurophysiological functioning capability that can become more powerful, and more powerful, and more powerful, OR less powerful, and less powerful, and less powerful, and which – OF COURSE, explains LITERALLY everything, including THIS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wn7zvv0PSbU&t=4sOf course.
And this also of course:
“At Hiroshima, The common lot was random, indiscriminate and universal violence inflicting terrible pain, the physics of hydraulics and leverage and heat run riot – A junior college girl: 'Ah, that instant! I felt as though I have been struck on the back with something like a big hammer, and thrown into boiling oil – I seem to have been blown a good way to the north and I felt as though the directions were all changed around.” Richard Rhodes – The Making Of The Atomic Bomb
Which is – OF COURSE, simply the ”long term effect” of the “function,” applied above, and that which we can NOT simply see with our eyes alone, but which we can certainly “see” the effects of, and which is, remember, simply this: E=Mc2, harnessed, abstracted, and then reapplied – to form pure chaos, pain and death, and/or: salt, of course,THIS:
“For everyone will be salted with fire. Salt is a good thing, but if salt has become insipid, how can you season it again? Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace with one another.” Mark 9: 48-50
And this as well, of course:
“And He began to teach them that the Son of Man was destined to suffer grievously, to be rejected by the elders and the chief priests and scribes, and to be put to death, and after three days to rise again; and He said all this quite openly.” Mark 9: 48-50
Ok, so I learned all of these things first hand, of course, and then learned more about the self evident perceivable universal functions of reality, and/or, how to how, exactly, to access the universal collective consciousness of mankind: the knowledge that all of mankind can have in common gathered through our senses, and, then, how to “harness” that understanding, and/or functions, and while beginning to learn how to communicate the ultimate in THIS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baHrcC8B4WMOk, so then I did spend a LITERAL lifetime learning all of these things, directly – through direct experience, only
And then, after I decided that I was through pursuing my ambition of being in the Olympics, I decided I wanted to try to “communicate” EVERYTHING that I had spent a lifetime learning about out in reality, and while including, especially, my “understanding of empathy,” and so I did.
Ok, now to INFINITELY simplify that developed understanding of reality – of it's simultaneously relative universally applicable functions, and how I learned how to communicate that understanding as well, and while actually accessing universally applicable empirical self consciousness, and/or the knowledge of reality that ALL of “mankind' can have in common gathered through our senses, and while also simultaneously accessing “universally applicable empathy,” and/or the literal pinnacle of uniquely human empathetic capabilities, I am going to provide this “perceivable proof,” because - remember, this:
“There are two essential yet complementary aspects of this new vision of time that are as striking in contrast as heaven and hell – Heaven is ruled by dynamical equations that are reversible and 'timeless,' their simplicity ensures stability for eternity. Hell is more akin to the real world, where chaos, fluctuations and uncertainty reign.” Peter Coveney and Roger Highfield
Ok, so because I did learn everything only through my exposure to reality, I also learned, of course, that there simply are no “images of things within our minds,” of course, and I also learned – through my exposure to reality, that the definition of “nature,” is: harmony – concord – life – etc, of course, because, remember, that is what reality is, ok?
Ok, so then I realized, that if EVERYTHING that surrounds us, is: chaos – discord – noise – pain – suffering – salt – death, and IF – as I said, I HAD actually developed my uniquely human empathetic capabilities, as I had said I had done, and we know THIS, remember:
“Proofs are not abstract. There is no such thing as proving something abstractly – One can, of course, define a class of abstract entities and call them 'proof,' but those 'proofs' can not verify mathematical statements because no one can see them...” David Deutsch
Ok, so as I said, I “said” that I developed an understanding of reality – in words, and I also said I had developed my uniquely human empathetic capabilities, and that I also understood that we are surround by “chaos” in our daily existence, and that – IF I truly had “developed my uniquely human empathetic capabilities,” as I had said I did, well then, the ABSOLUTE LAST thing that I would EVER want to do is to simply create even more “chaos” to allow my fellow human beings to be exposed to, because e- remember, as I HAVE developed my “empathetic” capabilities, that would just cause ME to experience: chaos – discord – noise – pain – suffering salt – death, and then, the ONLY “thing” that would EVER “prove,” is, what?
Well, THIS:
“Alas for you scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You who are like whitewashed tombs on the outside, but inside are full of dead men's bones and every kind of corruption. In the same way you appear to people from the outside like good honest men, but inside are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.” Matthew 23: 27-28
Or that I was a liar – and that I “understood” absolutely no “law,” actually, the universally applicable laws of nature, that is.
Ok, so let's “prove” it.
Ok, so let's look at a “liar,” such as this:
https://www.wikiart.org/en/paul-cezanne ... ow-chair-1Ok, so when we “look” at this ”picture” what can we know immediately?
Well, we can know – as we access our uniquely human universally applicable empirical self consciousness, and/or the “knowledge” - of the applied universally applicable simultaneously relative functions of simultaneously relative four dimensional reality, that the only “thing” that Cezanne “communicated” by “producing” that “picture,” is the exact same thing my dog, Sky, communicated, here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EZ2WIAX0QEAnd/or this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ucvf6Es3ikAnd/or, ABSOLUTELY “nothing,” except, of course: “Waaaaahhhh – I WANT: someone to pay attention to me – to be famous – to 'do' absolutely nothing, and have someone hand me money for doing it, a LOT of money – as I 'CON' the world into becoming brain dead, and capable of understanding absolutely nothing for themselves,” and as a matter of fact.
Because, remember, I CAN actually access my universally applicable empirical self consciousness, and I CAN actually experience empathy as well, and I CAN “prove” it, as well.
Ok, so let's prove it – so, in so proving it, we can ask ourselves:”How can we 'fix' what Cezanne did, in that 'picture,' and – in so doing, become capable of actually accessing our universally applicable empirical self consciousness, and/or the knowledge all of mankind can have in common gathered through our sense, and then “rearrange” the “building blocks,” in that “picture,” and – then, become capable of “proving” our uniquely human empathetic capabilities, while creating a simply “harmony' for our fellow human beings to be exposed to?
Ok, so let's begin: Ok, so, to begin with we do know this – and I DID learn this for myself through my exposure to all of simultaneously relative reality, and and which is the fact that human beings possess a three dimensional electrical potential mind, and parallel functioning central nervous system, and that human beings have a genetic predisposition for “perceiving three dimensional space” while beginning in the left, lowest – nearest, foreground, and then moving up – and out, diagonally, through the simultaneously relative depths of three dimensional space, and so – as we actually begin to do this, we can understand – immediately, that there is a problem, and being in that – as we begin our “movement,” within our minds – and through the depths of space, we can plainly see – as we do this, our “movement” will immediately begin to be “channeled” in a direction “AWAY” “from” the protagonist's eyes, and which is – of course, an ABSOLUTE contradiction to the function of “empathy,” as – OF COURSE, the “purpose” of empathy, is to allow ALL human beings to “share common harmonious experiences,” and/or to “be inside” another human being's mind/eyes, because – of course, as everyone knows, “the eyes are the windows to the soul.”
And so, we can know – as we try to “get inside the mind of the protagonist,” our movement will be redirected, because of the “heavy line” of the chair rail, and our understanding of this ”universal function:”
“All lines parallel with the viewer's line of sight recede to the horizon towards this vanishing point. This is the standard 'receding railroad tracks' phenomenon.”
And which is the fact that if you are standing in front of a rail road track and looking into the distance, the lines: of the rail road tracks, will appear to “rise up” and intersect at the horizon line: the “lines” move “up” as they “move” “away” in the far away “distance.”
Ok, so that means – as we begin to move into the space represented within the three dimensional pictorial scene, our “movement” will immediately be “redirected” by the positioning of the very heavy, and “powerful,” positioning of “chair rail,” behind Madame Cezanne, and then, instead of being led in a direction “towards” Madame Cezanne's eyes – and/or her soul, we will be led in a direction “away” from them, and in a direction towards her background
So, then – AS we become “redirected” in a direction away from Madame Cezanne's eyes, because of the heavy mass, and presence, of the chair rail, we will become immediately conflicted YET AGAIN, as we begin to “directed” in a direction towards that HUGE mass of a chair, and – again, while leading our “MINDS” in a direction AWAY from the protagonist's eyes, and in the exact wrong direction, yet again.
Then, as we actually do “move” in a direction towards that HUGE mass of a chair, because we will have been purposefully (actually unintentionally, of course) redirected in a direction towards that HUGE mass of a chair, we will be LITERALLY “stuck” at that point – BEHIND the chair, and AWAY from the protagonist's eyes, and the windows of the soul, of course.
So, then, as we TRY to “get around” that HUGE mass of a chair, and move in a direction towards the protagonist's eyes/windows to the soul, we will encounter EVEN more “contradictions.”
Because ALL of the cues - “collectively,” actually ALL literally “contradict” one another, and they simply do not add up, and they contradict what ANYONE would have seen in reality. Because, in addition, the tops of the chair rails do NOT “add up,” and that “reading” too causes ONLY “contradictions,” such as this, the tops of the chair rail moldings don't “intersect,” and, in addition, at the point where the chair rail intersects with the right hand perimeter, the top edge is higher up than where the chair rail intersects with the chair, and the opposite occurs in the left field. Which causes our mind to perceive this “composition” as if she was positioned at the point where two walls meet, at an exterior corner. Except, there's no vertical line above her head to substantiate that “read.”
And when you look at the Cezanne picture, that is exactly what the lines do in the right hand field: the lines move up at the perimeter, and which is indicating that she is sitting in front of a wall “going away.” But, in the left hand field the opposite happens: the line is higher up at the left hand perimeter, and which would indicate that that wall is “moving” in the opposite direction: or that Madame Cezanne is sitting at the exterior corner where 2 walls intersect, such as here:
http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/how-to- ... ons-180769And for added understanding, you can see this picture where 2 walls meet at an interior corner:
http://www.aaronshomeinspections.com/si ... ction.htmlAnd where the lines go “up” towards the center of the picture: where 2walls meet at an interior corner.
Except, there is no “vertical line” in the Cezanne picture, behind Madame Cezanne's head, as there is in those pictures, so that is an additional contradiction.
But, more importantly, the mere fact that he would put that chair rail there at all is an indication that Cezanne did not even begin to understand the concept of
Because, the primary purpose of composition is to “purposefully direct” all the “movement” towards, and around, the “human” protagonist, which is Madame Cezanne, and too it is supposed to be towards the protagonist's face. And when Cezanne put that chair rail where he did, it created the exact opposite effect, it directs all the movement “away” from Madame Cezanne's face. And worse than that, Cezanne painted that huge chair that Madamme Cezanne is sitting on. And when he painted all that mass of the chair rails, it leads our “minds:” NOT our “eyes,” in a direction towards the back of that huge chair. Then, because he has the chair pivoted in the wrong direction: because our minds have a natural inclination to perceive 3-D space beginning in the lower left foreground: and move up and out into the distance, as our minds do begin to “move,” they get redirected towards the back of that huge chair, because of latching onto the chair rails, and – then, after we get to the back of the chair, we have to try to redirect our minds: come back out into the foreground field, and then try to get back up to Madame Cezanne's face. But, because of the huge mass of the chair, the struggle starts all over again
So, if someone did understand the concepts of composition, what would they do? The polar opposite:
Pivot the protagonist in the opposite direction: with shoulders going away towards the left. Eliminate that huge mass of that chair. Take away the chair molding, and replace that chair molding with some compositional elements in the distance: maybe a road or a river. Then, purposefully use those elements to “direct” the mind towards the protagonist's eyes: in the far away distance. Then, use those same compositional elements to bring the mind back down through the midground, and into the foreground again. And then allow that whole process, of purposefully “directing” the viewer's mind from foreground, to midground, and then background, and through the protagonist's eyes, all over again - to "purposefully orchestrate an elementary Eternal Harmony," for all of MANKIND to access - "COLLECTIVELY."
Which would look like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_LisaSo, “that” is “proof" that someone, anyone – such as myself, is capable of experiencing “empathy,” and/or capable of proving that they are capable of accessing universally applicable empirical self consciousness, and/or the knowledge that all of mankind can have in common gathered through our senses, and – then, abstracting that understanding, and – then, reapplying that understanding as well, to become capable of literally effecting the collective consciousness of mankind, at an “elementary” level, of course.
Oh, and by the way, here is the “acoustic version” of that, as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOCclpD-_lw&t=9s