How to Apply Kantian Ethics

Discussions that deal with moral issues. Key questions in ethics include: How should one live? What is right (or wrong) to do? What is the best way for humans to live?

How to Apply Kantian Ethics

Postby Waterman on March 23rd, 2017, 10:23 pm 

I have read a fair bit on John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism and Immanuel Kant's Ethical Theories, and yet, my feeling is that Kant's writings are both an order of magnitude more extensive and more complex than Mill's, leaving me feeling confident only in putting Mill's Utilitarianism into practice via thought experiment.

Q: Can anyone offer me a step-by-step example of working through an ethical question, dilemma, situation, etc. via Kantian Ethics?

I'll leave the precise situation up to you but please chose something different than any of the examples Kant offers in Part II of the Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Many thanks.
Forum Neophyte
Posts: 1
Joined: 23 Mar 2017

Re: How to Apply Kantian Ethics

Postby Braininvat on March 26th, 2017, 7:22 pm 

It may be a bit shaky to start a thread, as a newbie, with what could be mistaken for a homework question. What is more likely to garner responses is to mull the question over and offer your own example, and whatever questions that raises for you. What I know of Kant's categorical imperative is that it is quite easy to come up with examples. If you will search "categorical imperative" on our site's search function, you will find numerous threads that have discussed Kantian ethics in relation to specific situations. That should get the ball rolling.
User avatar
Forum Administrator
Posts: 4935
Joined: 21 Jan 2014
Location: Black Hills

Re: How to Apply Kantian Ethics

Postby Lomax on March 26th, 2017, 7:47 pm 

Ha, this does come across like a homework question. Waterman, I hope you don't mind if I dissent from you rather than answering your question: I don't think Kantian ethics are as extensive (in their potential application) as utilitarian ethics. Take the categorical imperative: how do we decide which actions should be universalised? Is (Lomax shaves Lomax) morally wrong because I cannot will that everybody shaves Lomax? Or is it right because I can will that everybody shaves themselves? Is it a moral question at all? How does Kant help us determine? I don't think he can. And so I. Kant answer your question, either.
User avatar
Forum Administrator
Posts: 3306
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Location: Nuneaton, UK

Return to Ethics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests