Pictorial Cognition Explained.

All things related to Art! Poetry, painting, literature, visual, theater, movies, tv, music, media, culture, etc. Share your creativity or others', reviews, aesthetic theories, etc.

Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 21st, 2017, 3:03 pm 

Going out to see a sign of the times...

INTERMISSION:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvWg9WohJMg

A lot of clues there.
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 22nd, 2017, 10:54 am 

Alright, so let's watch an “expert” explaining the “conditioning” of Pavlov's dogs, and, you MUST watch all the way through, it's only 4 minutes long:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhqumfpxuzI

So, in that video, the expert does explain exactly how Pavlov's Dogs were “conditioned” to become capable, AFTER “conditioning,” of “associating food” with the “sound of the bell,” and, of course, “food/meat” is just another name for “Dopamine,” and/or: pleasure – sugar – harmony – music – LIFE, and, of course also, which: the “perception” of the “stimulus,” caused the dog to salivate – AS the “dog” experienced “dopamine” simply from the “perception of the food” AND the “sound of the bell,” AFTER the dog was “conditioned” to “associate the bell with the food,” and/or the receiving and consuming of the dopamine, actually functioning as “pure pleasure,” and, of course, which requires NO “cognitive capability” to experience: the dopamine/pure pleasure, BUT also while – and simultaneously, Pavlov did “prove” that a “dog” can be “conditioned” to experience the lowest level of “conscious awareness associated cognitive capabilities,” of being able to “associate the sound of the bell with the consumption of the dopamine,” and while experiencing “pleasure,” and, also while we know that they “dog” was being reliant upon HIS “worldly authoritative god figure” to supply him with his “purely pleasurable dopamine inducing stimulus.”

And we also know that even an Amoeba is capable of this:

“Neuroscientist Candace Pert: Even bacteria have a little hierarchy of primitive likes and dislikes. They're little robots that go for sugar at all costs, and away from salt...”

Alright, so in that Video, we also saw, at the end – remember, the “expert” give a perfect example of how “associated/conditioned cognition” can NEVER “supersede” ANY universally applicable “REALITY,” and such as when he said the word:”Relax,” AS he “Fired the gun,” and which – the mere “sound of the gun,” is, what?

Well, THIS:

“Gun firing: CHAOS – NOISE – DISCORD – PAIN – SALT – DEATH.”

Or, “Cause,” and which would result, in THIS “Effect:”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92gP2J0CUjc

And/or this: MOVE AWAY: 01001101 01001111 01010110 01000101 00100000 01000001 01010111 01000001 01011001.

Except, of course, not the “words” “move away,” but the REALITY, of “move away,” and, remember, which even an amoeba can understand:

“Do you think even cockroaches feel some sort of emotion,' we ask Neuroscientist Candace Pert, 'They have to, because they have chemicals that put them in the mood to mate and chemicals that make them run away when they're about to be killed. That's what emotions are about – sex and violence, pleasure and pain. Even bacteria have a little hierarchy of primitive likes and dislikes. They're programmed to migrate towards or away from a chemotatic substance; they're little robots that go for sugar at all costs and away from salt. If you were designing a robot to walk into the future and survive, as God was when he designed human beings, you'd wire it up so that behavior that ensured survival of the species – like sex and eating, would be naturally reinforcing. Behavior has to be controlled by the ANTICIPATION of of pleasure and pain, punishment and reward. And that has to be coded in the brain - But, if man speaks to God, if God speaks to man, it would be through the frontal cortex..” J. Hooper & J. Teresi

Alright, so we know, for a historical fact, that the aristocracy, and/or “rich,” had, actually, experienced the regression back to point time zero, from 1480, the year of of the production of Leonardo's The Annunciation, to 1580, and then through 1580 to 1680, from 1680 to 1780, and then culminating in 1880, with the introduction of 'Modern art,' and Pablo Picasso, and their actual admission of the “regression back to point time zero,” as well:

“Cezanne tried to make the ultimate journey back through time – Cezanne claimed to believe in his own sensations, moreover, he said so quite categorically; 'What counts is only mass' – This is an imaginary world which Cezanne could not have seen (in reality) – It is impossible to tell – We do not know – I could not tell – I could not decide – We do not know...Cezanne created a kind of space where one technique to create depth is canceled out by another – in other words, Cezanne is the painter of the distance that seems near – This was obviously against the rule of the constant observation point (but Cezanne couldn't understand that) – Cezanne was like a lion in Nietzche's sense, and rules mattered little to him...” Yvon Taillainder

But, in reality – historical reality that is, Cezanne NEVER sold a single picture in his lifetime, of course he didn't, because, as a matter of historical fact, Cubism, and Cezanne, was introduced to the “world” at the 1913 Armory show in New York, and you know what happened when they showed, THIS:

http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/ ... 51449.html

To the “people” at the 1913 Armory Show, in New York, well, the “people” walked into the 1913 armory show, and “saw” this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_VkZq84Piw

“Within” their minds, and within which, there exists ONLY this:

“The physical events impinging upon the senses are translated into the characteristic digital language of the brain – The same geometrical decorum applies to ALL projections...”

And which, of course, caused “THEM” - ALL of them, to do this:

“They're programmed to migrate towards or away from a chemotatic substance; they're little robots that go for sugar at all costs and away from salt..”

Because, in 1913, the WORLD still understood “REALITY,” and/or were actually capable of experiencing the function of “pictorial cognition,” and, they even simply “communicated” that EXACT same understanding, in things like The New York Times, and as is evidenced by The New York Times saying THIS:

"As Avant-Garde as the Rest of Them: An Introduction to the 1913 Armory Show Even before the Armory Show opened, organizers and more than a few journalists described the exhibition as an invasion of modern art on America. In the New York Times and Sun, headlines like 'It Will Throw a Bomb Into Our Art World and a Good Many Leaders Will be Hit' and 'Cubist, Futurists, and Post Impressionists Win First Engagement, Leaving the Enemy Awestruck'...." The New York Times

They, The New York Times, said it was “Like a bomb exploding,” and, specifically, what they said about Duchamp's 'Nude Descending A Staircase,” was this:”It looks like an explosion in a shingle factory,” and which, of course, “IS” what it actually is - “pictorially,” and so, also of course, that is what caused the “people” to “move in a direction away from it,” and to “LAUGHT at it,” as well:

"...Before the people could gain their breath, the old regime at once hurled the pits and stones of their wrath and contempt against the cubists'. The 'authorities' of the National Academy of Design and the Art Institute of Chicago joined students, professional critics, and the general public in responding to the Armory Show - In nearly all the papers, all composure was lost. The critics would begin by saying: there is no need to devote much space to the Cubists, who are utterly without importance and then they furiously gave them seven columns out of the ten that were taken up - The Armory Show was routinely compared to road shows and circuses to stress that cubism and futurism was 'faked' art —a vaudeville performance or a circus sideshow act – It (modern art) was defined as: 'immorality' – 'insanity' – 'schizophrenia' – 'psychopathy' – 'degenerate'...”Welcome To The 1913 Armory Show

And, at that point in time – 1913, THAT was “everyone,” meaning, of course, that today there are SOME who are still capable of “understanding” the actual function of “pictorial cognition,” and who say this about “modern art:”

"Hating the false intellectualism of contemporary art - I have no space in my head for things that become art simply because someone with an education added a lofty description. Here’s the stereotypical pretense. 'In simplicity, art becomes more direct and incisive in its dissection of the human mind, a more lucent mirror of our collective subconscious.' CRAP!!! It’s a frikkin rock - If a description is required then it might as well be a thought experiment with no physical subject - Contemporary art has become more about education than perception. In other words, you can’t appreciate it unless you have been trained to do so - there’s also a whole lot of mental masturbation, false creativity, and exploitive career building going on when a pile of dirt gets a label and becomes culturally relevant." Anonyming

But, in 1913 – AT the “New York Armory Show,” EVERYONE was able to understand the actual, literal, function of “pictorial cognition,” EVEN all of the newspapers, and ESPECIALLY Big Brother Number 1, The New York Times, as THEY said this about “Cubism:”

“Kenyon Cox: 'Up to the time of Matisse, the revolutionaries, I believe, were for the most part sincere enough . . . they made no money out of their beliefs . . . But with Matisse, with the later work of Rodin, and above all, with the Cubists and the Futurists, it is no longer a matter of sincere fanaticism. These men have seized upon the modern engine of publicity' - Cubism is 'junk' – Here is a little story which sums up my opinion of the movement – 'There once was an Emperor so fond of his new clothes that he spent all his money on being well dressed' – The Emperor's New Clothes – And so I can only cry with the little boy in the street – 'They have nothing on! They have nothing on!!...” New York Times

That it was nothing more than what it LITERALLY is, The Emperor's New Clothes, of course, and that was in 1913.

But – BUT, The New York Times, and specifically, Kenyon Cox, ALSO said this, about the 1913 Armory Show, actually in Downtown New York City, Manhattan:

“...The New York Armory Show drew attendance from a public outside that comparatively limited one that ordinarily goes to exhibitions – Here was something that must not be missed, and New York did not miss it, the gate receipts show that - In circles where art had never been discussed, one heard the question: 'Have you seen the Cubists and the Futurists,' and the response was always: 'Why, I don't know much about art, but it looked to me like a mess of nonsense'...”

And you want to know EXACTLY 'why' so many people did “move in a direction” towards the 'show,' at first, and just to go see what all the fuss was about, well, because, they said it remember, it was the 1913 equivalent of THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLm3pkAiJQ

Remember, THEY actually said it:

“'Armory Show' That Shocked America In 1913, Celebrates 100 – It was 'jarring' for people to see Duchamp's 'Nude Descending A Staircase' – It dropped a 'bomb' on the 'art establishment' – That's why the 1913 Armory Show was so important,' says Leah Dickerman (of MOMA) - The Armory Show attracted 97,000 visitors...” T. Vitale

And scientists are just beginning to acknowledge that scientific fact that “discord,” and/or: chaos – noise – pain – salt – death, does have the ability to “startle” a human being, and, then, induce a dose of “dopamine” within their minds and central nervous systems:

“One thing has become clear to scientists, memory is absolutely crucial to our consciousness – We don't have a memory system in the brain, we have memory systems, each playing a different role – When everything is going right, these different systems work together seamlessly – As we live our daily existence, we encounter patterns all day long, but if there is surprise – a car runs a red light, the mismatch between what is expected and what has happened, (induces dopamine) and shifts the mind into a higher level of awareness – The (discordant) memory becomes (more powerfully) imprinted into our minds...” Michael D. Lemonick

And so does: atonality – dissonance – discord, in “music:”

“Studies show that the mind is capable of sophisticated musical analysis even (in an) untrained mind – The 'sudden turn,' that a musical passage may take (causes a startle) in a listener's mind (and induces) dopamine...”

And so, when the “World” was – FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME, shown, this:

http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/ ... 51449.html

And the people that “saw” it, ALSO – simultaneously, “HEARD” this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_VkZq84Piw

It LITERALLY, as they admitted:

“Armory Show shocked America – it startled the people who saw it ...”

As they “admitted,” it “STARTLED” and “SHOCKED” them, and, as they also admitted, together, it was “The Shock Of The New:”

“The Shock of the New is a 1980 documentary television series written and presented by Robert Hughes produced by the BBC in association with Time-Life Films and produced by Lorna Pegram. It was broadcast by the BBC in 1980 in the United Kingdom and by PBS in 1981 in the United States.”

Yeah, it was The Shock Of The New:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3ne7Udaetg

And - remember, they: The Chief Priests and Scribes of Modern Art, and/or the Chief Priests and Scribes AND High Priesteeses:

"Gertrude Stein recently returned to America after an absence of many years. In Paris, where she lived as a forbidding priestess of a strange literary cult, Gertrude Stein accumulated a salon frequented by some of the outstanding names of the modern art world and acquired the reputation of a literary freak. People either gaped at her published writings, or laughed at her incomprehensible literary epigrams- "a rose is a rose is a rose ." She was looked upon by those who believed in her as the greatest revolutionist in the history of contemporary literature, and by those who scoffed as the perpetrator of a gigantic literary hoax..." Michael Gold

Of The Church Of The Big 'O,' Had also, and simultaneously, admitted that they had LITERALLY “regressed back to point time zero:”

"A revolution in paint: 100 years of Picasso’s Demoiselles - By far the most frequent comment on Les Demoiselles, in both journalism and art history, is that it marks 'the birth of modern art - Flatness alone was unique and exclusive to that art - It is like watching a stage in which the backdrop moves ever closer to the apron until it has squeezed out..." John Molyneux

And had become ONLY capable of neurophysilogically functioning like a new born child:

“...In the 1950's and 1960's studies began to appear that measured heart rate and sucking in infants, as well as visual fixation. A group of investigators presented visual stimuli to infants and found a pattern of physiological and behavioral changes to the presentation of novel stimulus...Theses studies, and many similar ones, demonstrated that infants – even very young infants, were sensitive to stimulation from a number of modalities and, perhaps, that they even had some memory of that stimulation – because of dopamine induction within their minds...” Infant Perception and Cognition – Leslie B. Cohen and Cara H. Cash

Now, take All of that into consideration, along with taking a tour through my “Virtual Gallery:”

https://www.pinterest.com/mrmikeludo/virtual-gallery/

And see if anyone can begin to put the pieces together – as to how they: The master manipulating psychopathic con artists, began to do it, how they became capable of conning the entire world, and/or this:

“You'd see that if a tyrant wishes to change a city's habitual ways, he doesn't need to exert great efforts or spend an enormous amount of time. What he has to do is first proceed himself, along the route he'd like the citizens to turn toward, whether it be toward the practices of virtue or the opposite. He need only first trace out a model in his own conduct of all that is to be done, praising and honoring some things while assigning blame to others, and casting dishonor on anyone who disobeys in each of the activities." Plato

So, here's another major clue:

"What did the art museum as an institution do for artists, it placed works of art on the pedestal of civilization, as the most significant and valuable of man's creations. " Richard R. Brettell

Along with this, of course:

“Piss Christ - depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank of the artist's urine. The piece was a winner of the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art's 'Awards in the Visual Arts,' which was sponsored in part by the National Endowment for the Arts, a United States Government agency that offers support and funding for artistic projects...”

And this:

“BadgerJelly: Being courteous to people does not involve calling them, and I quote, 'You lying sack of shit."


And this:

"Dopamine exercises extraordinary power over learning and memory (AS Pavlov's Dogs proved) – Dopamine, like most biologically important molecules, must be kept within strict bounds. Too much causes the hallucinations, and bizarre ideas, of schizophrenia..."

And this too, of course:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpwUts09F5g
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 22nd, 2017, 1:24 pm 

Alright, so again, at the 1913 Armory show:

“An Introduction to the 1913 Armory Show - 'The exhibition of the new art from Europe dropped like a bomb - Julian Street called Nude 'an explosion in a shingle factory.' This was by no means the only creative put-down hurled at Duchamp; Nude was also described as 'an elevated railroad stairway in ruins after an earthquake'... The New York Times

THIS is what the “people” ACTUALLY “saw,” WITHIN their “minds:”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFBG8f-XZcw

So, did you “hear” WHAT the “observer” said, @ :45, the “observer” said, “EVERYONE said 'get out,' 'get out,' 'get out,” and/or: “MOVE AWAY,” from the: DISCORD – NOISE – CHAOS – PAIN – SALT – SUFFERING – DEATH.

And then, @1:15, the SAME “observer,” said this:”I've never seen war up close – Today I have...”

And, did you also happen to see “what” that SAME “New Yorker” had “hanging around HIS neck,” here, have another look:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFBG8f- ... tu.be&t=41

Yeah, hanging around that New Yorker's neck, is one of “these”

“Piss Christ - depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank of the artist's urine. The piece was a winner of the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art's 'Awards in the Visual Arts,' which was sponsored in part by the National Endowment for the Arts, a United States Government agency that offers support and funding for artistic projects...”

And remember exactly what else those SAME “New Yorkers” said about THIS:

“The Holy Virgin Mary is a painting created by Chris Ofili in 1996. It was one of the works included in the Sensation Show - ' In 1998, Ofili was the first black artist to be awarded the Turner Prize. The painting was sold for $4.6 million in June 2015 - The work employs mixed media, including elephant dung (and) pornographic images...” Wikipedia

Well, those SAME “New Yorkers” said THIS about THEM ”Throwing shit on The Holy Virgin Mary:”

“A Shock Grows In Brooklyn – A fiery controversy over a museums new show brings New York's Mayor out slugging: The Mayor blew up three weeks ago over the controversial exhibition, 'Sensation,' Young British artists from Saatchi Collection' – The mayor was especially outraged by The Holy Virgin Mary With Elephant Dung,' a paining by Chris Ofili who threw shit on the Holy Virgin – Polls showed that both the majority of New York residents and a nationwide sample were against shutting down the publicly financed exhibition, and had no problem with feces being thrown on the Mother of God...”

That they had NO PROBLEM, whatsoever, with “US” being able to FORCE the “THEM,” and/or the “Mother of God” to be exposed to the pinnacle, of this: DISCORD – CHAOS – PAIN – SUFFERING – SALT – DEATH – RISRESPECT, and, remember, according to YOUR “testimony:”

“BadgerJelly: Being courteous to people does not involve calling them, and I quote, 'You lying sack of shit." “Eclogite: If you have to ask because you don't know then you have a problem. If you have to ask because you wish to make a point, then here are the negatives in the phrase: 1. Accusing people of lying is often discourteous. 2. Characterising them as an inanimate object is discourteous unless that object is generally valued. 3. Comparing them to fecal matter is discourteous. Why are each of these actions discourteous? Societal norms have determined that such is the case. You don't have to like it, that's just the way it is.”


But, did you also “hear” EXACTLY “what” THOSE EXACT SAME PEOPLE were actually “saying,” AS “US” – The “New Yorkers,” and/or “good guys,” were being FORCED to experience: DISCORD – CHAOS – PAIN – SUFFERING – SALT – DEATH – RISRESPECT, by the “THEM,” “terrorists” - “bad guys,” here have another listen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLm3pkAiJQ

Yeah, they ALL were saying”OH MY GOD – OH MY GOD – OH MY GOD – OH MY GOD,” and because it's kind of like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqG1Dh36-6s

Because, they – The New Yorkers, and, apparently, the “Majority” of Americans, have, absolutely NO PROBLEM, with “throwing shit” on the Mother of God, AND “pouring salt(clue)” in the open wounds of God's Son, after he was: betrayed – belittled – ridiculed – manacled – tortured – murdered, and then “laughing” about it, too (but ONLY 'intellectually' – abstractly, of course), just like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNJIloJ ... tu.be&t=51

So, anyways, that's NOT “what” the the factual lying psychopathic con artists saw, and, actually, ANY of ANY of “that.”

You want to know exactly why?

Well, THIS is EXACTLY why:

“Psychopaths seem to know the dictionary meanings of words but fail to comprehend or appreciate (OR 'experience') their emotional value or significance (while functioning as if) he knows the words but not the music. Recent laboratory research provides convincing support for these clinical observations. This research is based on evidence that, for normal people, neutral words generally convey less information (less understanding of reality) than do emotional words: A word such as PAPER has a dictionary meaning, whereas a word such as DEATH has a dictionary meaning plus emotional meaning, and unpleasant connotations. Emotional words have more 'punch' than do non emotional words. Picture yourself at a computer screen on which groups of letters are flashed for a second. Electrodes for recording brain responses have been attached to your scalp and connected to an EEG machine, which draws a graph of the electrical activity of the brain. Some of the groups of letters flashed up on the screen form common words found in the the dictionary; other strings no words, only nonsense syllables. For example, TREE forms a word but RETE does not. Your task is to push a button as quickly as possible whenever you have decided that a true word has appeared on the screen. The computer measures the time that it takes you to make your decisions; it also analyses your brain responses during the task. You will probably respond more quickly to an emotional word than to a neutral one. For example, you would probably push the button quicker at the word DEATH than the word PAPER. The emotional content (and real word) seem to give the words a sort of 'turbo-boost' to the decision making process. At the same time, the emotional words evoke larger brain responses than do neutral words – When we used this laboratory test with prison inmates, the non-psychopaths showed the normal pattern of response – BUT the psychopaths did NOT: They responded to emotional words as if they were neutral words – to a psychopath, a word is just a word...” Dr. Robert Hare – Without Conscience

Yeah, because it is – NEUROPHYSIOLOGICALLY, impossible, “psychopaths” literally can NOT “see” ANYTHING, besides:

“...Highly intelligent people with psychopathic personalities find fertile, nonviolent opportunities in conning and manipulating others, in (Stephen) Porter's view...(Joseph P.) Newman views psychopathic personalities as the product of an attention deficit. Psychopaths focus well on their explicit goals but ignore incidental information that provides perspective and guides behavior, Newman holds...Furthermore, because psychopaths ignore peripheral information that provides context and meaning to daily situations, Newman argues, they don't appreciate music, or other endeavors that require depth of feeling...” Science News – The Predator's Gaze – Bruce Bower

Opportunity baby, opportunity:

“Psychopaths can be very effective in presenting themselves well and are often likable and charming...Typically, they attempt to be familiar with sociology, psychology, psychiatry, medicine, psychology, philosophy, poetry, literature, art, or law. A signpost to this is often a smooth lack of concern at being found out.” Dr. Robert Hare

Opportunity:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP3QDczTxXg
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 22nd, 2017, 8:28 pm 

Alright, so quite often it can be rather difficult for people to fully experience complete empathy for another human being even today:

“Empathy: the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully communicated in an objectively explicit manner; also - the capacity for this...”

But, to become completely empathetic for people who lived 100, 200, or 2000 years ago is even more difficult.

So, let's look at this:

“Murderous violence accompanied a planned race riot organized by neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups (please, let’s stop calling what took place a 'rally') in Charlottesville, Virginia, last weekend. Many more such events are now planned to take place across the country. At least part of the American public appropriately holds Donald Trump and his administration accountable for these events - Yet now more than ever, it’s important to remember that meaningful and lasting change has rarely been brought forth by the hands of young men who carry out violence, but rather by the people bravely moving forward in nonviolent resistance - Chenoweth described Trump as having 'demagogic aspects of his behavior' and warned of the importance of recognizing 'the broader authoritarian currents in the American polity that put him in power' - 'The more you fill the environment with stimuli that are associated with violence, the more likely violence is to occur,' concludes social psychologist Bruce Bartholow. Like a disease, therefore, the spread of violence is best halted by a wall of healthy – or nonviolent – people...” Antonio Juhasz

Ok, so this is an article from today's Guardian, U.K., about President Elect Trump's, apparent, demagoguery, and/or this:

“Demagoguery is an appeal to people that plays on their emotions and prejudices rather than on their rational side. Demagoguery is a manipulative approach — often associated with dictators and sleazy politicians — that appeals to the worst nature of people.”

And THIS is a “contemporary hot topic,” of course meaning there are stories about this particular topic, President Elect Donald Trump's supposed demagoguery, every day, in every newspaper, not just in America, but all around the world, and such as where I pulled that particular reference from, and, actually, The Guardian, U.K., has an entire section devoted to THAT exact topic, and they call it “The Resistance.”

Alright, so what I like to do, when I am attempting to experience COMPLETE empathy for any other human being, and/or any being for that matter, is to imagine the equivalent of what THOSE people experienced, from MY contemporary viewpoint, such as looking at THIS:

"As Avant-Garde as the Rest of Them: An Introduction to the 1913 Armory Show Even before the Armory Show opened, organizers and more than a few journalists described the exhibition as an invasion of modern art on America. In the New York Times and Sun, headlines like 'It Will Throw a Bomb Into Our Art World and a Good Many Leaders Will be Hit' and 'Cubist, Futurists, and Post Impressionists Win First Engagement, Leaving the Enemy Awestruck'...." The New York Times

From, a viewpoint analogous to THIS:

“Murderous violence accompanied a planned race riot organized by neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups (please, let’s stop calling what took place a 'rally') in Charlottesville - Chenoweth described Trump as having 'demagogic aspects of his behavior' and warned of the importance of recognizing 'the broader authoritarian currents in the American polity that put him in power'...”

And meaning, of course, that I imagine that I've taken a trip back in time, and awoken on a typical day in 1913, and then “see” exactly “what” it was that was the “Hot Topic” back then, and which would have been, this:

“GIVEN THE SPEED, TIME IS NAUGHT; If Man Moved with the Velocity of Light He Might Remain, Unchanged for 1,000 Years. THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY Among Other Things, It Makes Simultaneity of Two Widely Separated Events Impossible. Time Eliminated by Velocity. Relatively Explains It. What Is This Theory? Light and Motion. Confounded at Results. Its Length Constantly Changes. The Puzzle of Simultaneity...” The New York Times – 1919

Ok, so that - Einstein's Relativity, wasn't exactly in 1913, but 1919.

So, let's find something a little closer.

Well, I think I might have mentioned that I had a shop at one point in time, and, in that shop, I had some books, and this is one of those books, from about THAT point in time:

“Critical Studies In Feeble Mindedness – Feeble-mindedness is a leading social problem which insistently claims the attention of all branches of social science...Only the highest grades of mental defectives can learn the three R's effectively. Binet and Simon once classified the grades of feeble-mindedness on this basis and claimed that, roughly, idiots cannot talk, imbeciles cannot read or write, and morons cannot deal with abstractions...” Edgar Doll

Yeah, you see, THAT: Identifying the 'feeble-minded,' was a hot topic back in the early twentieth century, right about the time THIS was introduced to the world:

http://modernism-literature-movement.we ... casso.html

And, you know, the people in the know, back then – at the beginning of the twentieth century, used to travel around the country, because ther was no internet back then, and, to experience true empathy you really have to “get into the shoes” of the people you are empathizing with, and, well, when those people in the know used to travel around the country, they used to teach the masses how to recognize the feeble-minded, and you wanna know what one of the tests was, for identifying the “feeble-minded,” well, look, I've defined it, here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvZ4UmX ... u.be&t=330

Yeah, they used to give children tests, to see if they appeared to be “feeble-minded,” and, if a child, of, say, 12, 13, 14, or even higher, drew a “picture” of a “person” - a “human person,” that looked like somewhat like this:

http://modernism-literature-movement.we ... casso.html

Well, then, the parents, of that poor unfortunate child, could know that they, quite probably, had a feeble-minded child to contend with.

And which is exactly, why, when the people walked into the 1913 Armory Show, and saw Cubism and 'Modern art' for the very first time, they walked out and said this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvZ4UmX ... u.be&t=230

And/or this:

“Here is a little story which sums up my opinion of the movement – 'There once was an Emperor so fond of his new clothes that he spent all his money on being well dressed' – The Emperor's New Clothes – And so I can only cry with the little boy in the street – 'They have nothing on! They have nothing on!!...”

Alright, so we know that by simply looking a the factual history of art, we can simply see the reflection of the aristocracy's literal regression back to point time zero, and simply see them actually becoming only capable of functioning as a new born child can only function, and only capable of 'seeing' two dimensionally, and again as a matter of scientific fact:

“Psychopaths seem to suffer a kind of emotional poverty that limits the range and depth of their feelings – Their mental packages are not only small but they are 'two-dimensional,' devoid of any (real) emotional meaning - While at times they appear cold and unemotional, they are prone to dramatic, shallow, and short-lived displays of feeling. Careful observers are left with the impression that they are play acting and that little is going on below the surface – Sometimes they claim to experience strong emotions but are unable to describe the subtleties of various effective states. For example, they equate love with sexual arousel, sadness with frustration and anger with irritability – In some respects they're like emotionless androids depicted in science fiction, unable to image what real humans experience.” Dr. Robert Hare

And also only capable of functioning like “something from a science fiction movie,” according to the experts, and – again, only capable of 'seeing' two dimensionally, and, which means, EXACTLY what?

Well, it means that they – the aristocracy, became neurophysilogically incapable of cognizing any Time made manifest, and as Kant did explain, remember:

“For there is only one time in which all other times must be placed – draw a line stretching to infinity...” Kant

And which also means that the aristocracy had become neurophysiologically incapable of cognizing ANY “simultaneously relative functions,” of any and/or all kinds, and again as a matter of scientific fact, and also neurophysilogically incapable of accessing ANY of THIS:

“One thing has become clear to scientists, memory is absolutely crucial to our consciousness – There's almost nothing you do, from perception to thinking, that doesn't draw continuously on your memory, and it can't be otherwise, since there really is no such thing as a present – Memory provides a personal context, a sense of self and a sense of the past, present – and a frame for the future – But memory is not a single phenomenon. We don't have a memory system in our brain, we have memory systems, each playing a different role – All of these different systems are stored in the brain's cortex – What's happening when the brain forms memory, is that it's the connections, and particularly the strength of those connections, that are altered by experience, as nerve cells are firing simultaneously and coordinating different sets of information. But experts in brain imaging are only beginning to understand how the parts are reassembled into a coherent whole...When everything is going right, these different systems work together seamlessly. If you're taking a bicycle ride, for example, the memory of how to operate the bicycle comes from one set of neurons, the memory of how to get from here to there comes from another, the nervous feeling you have from taking a bad spill last time out, comes from yet another. Yet you are never aware that your mental experience has been assembled, bit by bit, like some invisible edifice inside your mind (and parallel functioning central nervous system..” Michael Lemonick

And, again, only capable of functioning in a purely psychopathic manner, and/or this way, also:

“Psychopaths are easily bored and have an ongoing and excessive need for excitement..”

And, which means, what?

Anyone?

Ok, let's look at my “Virtual Reality,” again:

https://www.pinterest.com/mrmikeludo/virtual-gallery/

And put our minds INTO the minds of a psychopath, and, so – WHAT DO WE “SEE?”

Ok, so we know that the aristocracy DID literally regress all the way back to point time zero, and became only capable of functioning like young children, who can NOT cognize any and/or all functions, and/or any three dimensional space, and who can ONLY “see” two dimensionally, and/or ONLY “tangible form mass nouns,” and/or “THINGS,” and, so, look again, what do you “see,” if you are a “psychopath:”

https://www.pinterest.com/mrmikeludo/virtual-gallery/

And FOR FOUR HUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNDDDDDDDRRRRRREEEEDDDDD BORING AND LONG YEARS, as well?

Well, IF you are a “psychopath,” who can ONLY “see” tangible form mass, “what” you WILL only “see,” is THE SAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMEEEEEEE OOOOLLLLLLDDDD BORING THINGS, and for four hundred boring years, as well.

And which was, FOUR HUNDRED LONG AND BORING YEARS OF, the same old: three dimensional people - three dimensional buildings, and three dimensional trees, and for FOOOUUUR HUNNNDDDDRRREEED LOOOOOOONNNNGGG ANNND BOOORRING YEARS, as well.

Right up to 1880.

And then along came their “Savior,” Pablo Picasso, with THIS:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Demoi ... %27Avignon

And, KA CHING!!!!

They, the psychopathic aristocracy, hit THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DK31EvACis

Yeah, the aristocracy hit the dopamine trifecta, when Pablo Picasso came along, in 1913.

And then, 2 years later, they introduced THIS to the world:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvG0K5AdKiM&t=32s

And put the world to sleep.
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby BadgerJelly on August 22nd, 2017, 10:14 pm 

Attempting to read these posts is like attempting to eat soup with a fork. Most of the time I just cannot be bothered trying and prefer to wait for a spoon (it doesn't taste that great anyway.)

I was thinking I'd take a look at your post today then noticed two more equally inaccessible.
User avatar
BadgerJelly
Resident Member
 
Posts: 4506
Joined: 14 Mar 2012


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 22nd, 2017, 10:40 pm 

BadgerJelly » August 22nd, 2017, 10:14 pm wrote:Attempting to read these posts is like attempting to eat soup with a fork. Most of the time I just cannot be bothered trying and prefer to wait for a spoon (it doesn't taste that great anyway.)

I was thinking I'd take a look at your post today then noticed two more equally inaccessible.


Not so.

I'll explain that tomorrow.

Here's a clue:

"Psychopaths see the rules and expectations of society as inconvenient and unreasonable impediments to their own behavioral expression. They make their own rules, both as children and as adults - The psychopath is a rebel, a religious disobeyer of prevailing codes and standards ... a rebel without a cause, an agitator without a slogan, a revolutionary without a program; in other words, his rebelliousness is aimed to achieve goals satisfactory to him alone; he is incapable of exertions for the sake of others. All his efforts, under no matter what guise, represent investments designed to satisfy his immediate wishes and desires - The flip side of this yen for excitement is an inability to tolerate routine or monotony. Psychopaths are easily bored and are not likely to engage in activities that are dull, repetitive, or require intense concentration over long periods..." Dr. Robert Hare

And this as well:

"Dopamine can be elevated by a ...word of praise..."
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby BadgerJelly on August 23rd, 2017, 12:13 am 

What I mean is you'll get a lot further presenting a smaller bowl or working on the tools of consumption.

I would suggest cutting down on the quotes (thinking about this, it is probably why no one took me up on my past look at Husserl. It was simply too much for any passing glance to deal with.)

I have a lot of "free time" but others don't. In todays world being concise and deliberate in your writing is becoming more and more important. It takes serious dedication to attempt to perfect this "art".

I see a quote and I switch off because all you add to it is "look here" with only the vaguest tools for the readrer as to how or what significance this has to what you're talkgin about (which is also quite vague.)

I wrote about Husserl, but at least I was consistently quoting Husserl and moving step by step through the book. I task I will continue with because writing about something helps me to see more clearly what problems I am having in understanding and approaching the various ideas circulating in my head.
User avatar
BadgerJelly
Resident Member
 
Posts: 4506
Joined: 14 Mar 2012


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 23rd, 2017, 5:06 am 

BadgerJelly » August 23rd, 2017, 12:13 am wrote:What I mean is you'll get a lot further presenting a smaller bowl or working on the tools of consumption.

I would suggest cutting down on the quotes (thinking about this, it is probably why no one took me up on my past look at Husserl. It was simply too much for any passing glance to deal with.)

I have a lot of "free time" but others don't. In todays world being concise and deliberate in your writing is becoming more and more important. It takes serious dedication to attempt to perfect this "art".

I see a quote and I switch off because all you add to it is "look here" with only the vaguest tools for the readrer as to how or what significance this has to what you're talkgin about (which is also quite vague.)

I wrote about Husserl, but at least I was consistently quoting Husserl and moving step by step through the book. I task I will continue with because writing about something helps me to see more clearly what problems I am having in understanding and approaching the various ideas circulating in my head.


Thank you, BadgerJelly, that's a major clue, see:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chahtq-x-n4

Think, BadgerJelly, think - DON'T Use The Force, actually think about it, BadgerJelly.

Think, it's really not that hard:

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/464855992 ... 3/?lp=true
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby Eclogite on August 23rd, 2017, 7:44 am 

Moderator Warning: MrMikeludo, you have been advised to stop being cryptic. Either state clearly, wholly within this thread and in your next post, what you are hinting at in your previous post or this thread will be locked and you will receive a 48 hour suspension.
Eclogite
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 1388
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Location: Around and about


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby BadgerJelly on August 23rd, 2017, 10:58 am 

Mik -

If you want to talk about this then TALK about it.

You may find I know more about this subject than you think.
User avatar
BadgerJelly
Resident Member
 
Posts: 4506
Joined: 14 Mar 2012


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 23rd, 2017, 5:07 pm 

Alright, well it's not “cryptic,” and it's also not very difficult, but it is an indication of how well they, the lying psychopathic con artists that did take over Art at the beginning of the twentieth century, did their job, and again by YOUR (all) testimony, as Braininvat said THIS:

“And voting for a con artist who bilked Trump U. students out of millions of dollars is the way to go about that worthy goal ..”

You see, Braininvat said he recognized that Donald Trump was a “con artist,” because he “founded a school” which really wasn't a school, and/or had no accreditation, or WHATEVER, and it was literally defined as a “scam:”

“Yes Trump University Was A Massive Scam - Many people believe that higher education is a de facto scam. Trump University, Donald Trump’s real-estate institution, was a de jure one. First thing first, Trump University was never a university. When the “school” was established in 2005, the New York State Education Department warned that it was in violation of state law for operating without a NYSED license. Trump ignored the warnings...”

So Donald Trump “took people's money,” and “lied about 'what' he was 'providing them with,” and, therefore, he “scammed” them:

“Scam: a dishonest scheme – a fraud – swindle.”

“SWINDLE: USE DECEPTION TO DEPRIVE SOMEONE OF MONEY OR POSSESSIONS.”

Well, what the lying psychopathic con artists that took over the Art World did in the early twentieth century, is literally “infinitely” worse:

“Infinitely to an infinite extent or amount; without limit.

And literally incapable of being calculated, and – also, not even one iota “subjective,” and/or incapable of being exactly, explicitly, defined.

HERE IT IS:

All through history, there was NO SUCH THING as an “Art museum,” and/or “art gallery,” and, the museums that did exist were “museums of antiquity,” wherein they had examples of THIS:

"What did the art museum as an institution do for artists, it placed works of art on the pedestal of civilization, as the most significant and valuable of man's creations. " Richard R. Brettell

And no one, NO ONE, ever “bought a picture,” that was already painted, and – HISTORICALLY, factually, there was no such thing as an “Artist,” they were “art” - “i” - “sans,” and they worked in a “guild,” or a bottega, equal to a contracting company today, and when the worldly political institutions, such as the Catholic Church, wanted a building built, they would contract the guild, or contracting company, to build the ENTIRE building, and then, the “ARTISAN” would work within the guild, for which the “ARTISAN” was commissioned to “paint a picture,” and NO ONE EVER simply painted a picture, and then waited for someone to come along and buy it, they: the ARTISANS, were paid an hourly wage, to perform their MINEAL manual labor, and THIS is all “historical fact:”

“ART - The original classical definition - derived from the Latin word 'ars' (meaning 'skill' or 'craft') - is a useful starting point. This broad approach leads to art being defined as: 'the product of a body of knowledge, most often using a set of skills.' Thus Renaissance painters and sculptors were viewed merely as skilled artisans - interior-decorators. No wonder Leonardo Da Vinci went to such efforts to elevate the status of artists (and by implication art itself) onto a more intellectual plane...” Encyclopedia Of Art

And, YES, there was ANOTHER reason the “art” - “i” - “sans,” such as EVERYONE preceding Leonardo Da Vinci, were commissioned to paint a picture, and that was because rich egocentrics, and/or “demagogues,” and such as Donald Trump, would want to have their portrait painted so that they could believe that they could have their image preserved for posterity, and/or, so that they could Lord their power over everyone else.

And which, of course, is exactly why Leonardo painted The Mona Lisa, because he was commissioned to paint a picture of some rich guy's wife.

And then, Leonardo DID do THIS:

viewtopic.php?f=54&t=19902

And “transformed” all of the ”universally applicable humanistic building blocks” THAT had previously been IN EVERY single (infinite amount) of pictures in the entire history of the world, and of some three dimensional humanistic: trees – buildings – people, into THIS:

“Here no one hazards guesses as to whether two threes makes more or less than six – Here all guess work remains destroyed in eternal silence, and which is not possible with the delusional sciences of the wholly cerebral kind...”

A LITERAL “mathematically verifiable function,” and so, ERGO:

The “scientific,” and “mathematically verifiable,” FACT, is this, just like Leonardo said:

“Leonardo: True sciences are those which have penetrated through the senses as a result of experience, and thus silencing the tongues of the disputants: not feeding investigators on dreams, but always proceeding successively from primary truths and established principles, in a proper order towards their conclusion. This may be witnessed in the principles of mathematics, termed arithmetic and geometry, which deal with continuous and discontinuous quantities with the utmost truth. From the visual rays, the science of perspective has arisen, since it consists of radiant visual lines and intersecting pyramids. All the instances of perspective are expounded through the five terms of the mathematician, namely, point, line, angle, surface, and body – And from these is born the proportionality called harmony, which delights the sense with sweet concord, no differently from the proportionality made by different musical notes to the sense of hearing, and as they are born of continuous and discrete quantities, while effecting a composition which simultaneously conveys the proportional harmony of which the parts are composed – it can generate a proportional harmony in the time equivalent to a single glance. The harmonic proportionality, of the whole non tangible form composition, is composed simultaneously from the various components, the sweetness of which may be judged both in their general and their particular effects, in general according to the dictates of the composition; in particular according to the dictates of the component parts from which the totality is composed...”

Is THIS: Leonardo da Vinci FOUNDED THE LITERAL SCHOOL OF “ART:”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_School_of_Athens

That's EXACTLY “why” Raphael PUT:

“In the center of the fresco, at its architecture's central vanishing point, are the two undisputed main subjects: Plato on the left and Aristotle, his student, on the right - Plato holds Timaeus - Plato is depicted as old, wise-looking - Plato's Timaeus was, even in the Renaissance, a very influential treatise on the cosmos - And the beginning of Time (made manifest) – Plato ( is) LEONARDO DA VINCI...”

Leonardo da Vinci in THE MIDDLE OF THE SCHOOL, because Leonardo da Vinci FOUNDED THE LITERAL SCHOOL OF “ART.”

THIS is ALL “factual history.”

ERGO, if – IF, a – one, LITERALLY, “ONE” single school, defining itself as an “Art school,” and whether it be a grade school, a high school, a college, a grad school, is NOT ONLY LITERALLY, FACTUALLY AND LITERALLY teaching, ONLY THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E_PQiqW9Fk

And/or the “mathematically verifiable” FUNCTION of “mathematically verifiable pictorial syntax,” and/or the “mathematically verifiable” FUNCTION of a “mathematically verifiable visual musical equivalent,” actually functioning as a mathematically verifiable, concordant, polyphonically structured whole, of non tangible form geometrical equations, effectually functioning as, while remaining subservient to, a hierarchically structured whole: visual symphony, AS Leonardo did explain:

“ And from these is born the proportionality called harmony, which delights the sense with sweet concord, no differently from the proportionality made by different musical notes to the sense of hearing, and as they are born of continuous and discrete quantities, while effecting a composition which simultaneously conveys the proportional harmony of which the parts are composed – it can generate a proportional harmony in the time equivalent to a single glance. The harmonic proportionality, of the whole non tangible form composition, is composed simultaneously from the various components, the sweetness of which may be judged both in their general and their particular effects, in general according to the dictates of the composition; in particular according to the dictates of the component parts from which the totality is composed..”

They are "lying," and "conning" anyone that walks into their "school."

And, this is NOT “debatable,” it is FACT – ALL HISTORICAL FACT:

“Before the Italian Renaissance artists held the same position in society as any other skilled craftsman and were given as much respect as carpenters....” Art In The Renaissance – Life In Italy.com

“...Renaissance painters and sculptors were viewed merely as skilled artisans (interior decorators). No wonder Leonardo da Vinci went to such efforts to elevate the status of artists (and by implication art itself) onto a more intellectual plane.” Definition Of Art - Encyclopedia Of Art

And so, FACTUALLY, any – LITERALLY ANY, “school” on the face of this earth, that defines itself as “teaching art,” and does not ONLY “teach” what I just explained, whether it be, a: grade school, high school, college, grad school – whatever, IS FACTUALLY “scamming people, ” and simply literally ripping them off, literally, THIS:

“SWINDLE: USE DECEPTION TO DEPRIVE SOMEONE OF MONEY OR POSSESSIONS.”

And, THIS, as Braininvat explained:

“And voting for a con artist who bilked Trump U. students out of millions of dollars is the way to go about that worthy goal ..”


And, there is NO SCHOOL, on the face of this earth that even knows what I just explained even exists.

ERGO: EVERY single “Art School,” on the ENTIRE face of this earth, is – by literal, factual definition, ONLY THIS:

“...Highly intelligent people with psychopathic personalities find fertile, nonviolent opportunities in conning and manipulating others, in (Stephen) Porter's view...” Science News – The Predator's Gaze – Bruce Bower

ALL master manipulating psychopathic con artists – as a matter of fact.

And every single human being, on the entire face of this entire earth, can now ONLY do one of two things, in regards to these “facts,” and that is, either acknowledge the facts, and help me start to work on bringing the con artists down, and exposing the truth, OR:

“Proofs are not abstract. There is no such thing as proving something abstractly – One can, of course, define a class of abstract entities and call them 'proof,' but those 'proofs' can not verify mathematical statements because no one can see them...” David Deutsch

Simply prove that you have become a victim of the con, the greatest collective con in the history of the world.

So, this is how they did it.

Remember Pavlov:

“Pavlovian Conditioning - Pavlov discovered that any object or event which the dogs learnt to associate with food would trigger a response - Pavlov knew that somehow, the dogs in his lab had learned to associate food with his lab assistant. This must have been learned, because at one point the dogs did not do it, and there came a point where they started, so their behavior had changed. A change in behavior of this type must be the result of learning - What had happened was that the neutral stimulus (the lab assistant) had become associated with an unconditioned stimulus (food) - In his experiment, Pavlov used a bell as his neutral stimulus. Whenever he gave food to his dogs, he also rang a bell. After a number of repeats of this procedure, he tried the bell on its own. As you might expect, the bell on its own now caused an increase in salivation. So the dog had learned an association between the bell and the food and a new behavior had been learnt. Because this response was learned (or conditioned), it is called a conditioned response. The neutral stimulus has become a conditioned stimulus...” Saul McLeod – Simply Psychology

Well, what the master manipulating psychopathic con artists “Art World” simply did, was to literally brain wash, by conditioning, all of their victims, into believing that the definition of Art – Art with a capital 'A,' was, and is, the literally defined pinnacle antithesis of what it factually is, and, again, by simply “conditioning” all of their victims exactly as Pavlov did, but, not simply to the extent that Pavlov did, but to this extent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de_b7k9kQp0

As a matter of scientific fact.

Alright, so this is what they did: They literally conditioned their victims EXACTLY the same as Pavlov did, so, the EXACT way they replicated the conditioning was this way: They simply did the EXACT equivalent of “Ringing a bell,” and which is simply saying the word:”Art,” and then they simply, literally, scientifically, and factually did the equivalent of “Throwing the dogs some meat,” and which is THIS:

“Clustered in loose knots buried deep in the brain are neurons that produce molecular messengers, within the primitive structure that is one of the brain's key pleasure centers. At a purely chemical level, just as the injection of heroin triggers release of dopamine, so too every experience humans find enjoyable induces dopamine - Dopamine can be elevated by a hug, a kiss a word of praise – by exposure to all newly perceived novel stimulus, by becoming the center of attention, by worldly power and by consumption of food, and especially by money, and by material possessions – by drugs and alcohol..”

They gave their victims some “dopamine” to consume, and/or: pleasure – remember, just as the neuroscientist explained:

“Candace Pert: We've measure opiate receptors in everything from fruit fly heads to human brains. Even unicellular organisms have peptides – they're little robots that go for sugar at all costs, and away from salt...”

And, remember, they: The ”original” victims of the con, were the aristocracy who had actually regressed back to point time zero, and who had become only capable of functioning like young children, who are neurophysiologically incapable of cognizing any functions, and who are only capable of “seeing” tangible form mass STIMULUS, and – remember also, the victims had also – and simultaneously, began to become capable of functioning in a psychopathic manner, and who, ALL psychopaths, are easily bored by ALL stimulus, while they are – simultaneously, incapable of being effected by harmony, and/or beauty, and while they are also – and simultaneously, “rebels,” who can never understand the universally applicable a priori rules of universal reality, and so when Pablo Picasso came along with this:

http://www.pablo-ruiz-picasso.net/work-2172.php

It was the “trifecta of DOPAMINE” - PURE “DRUG,” and/or literally the factual equivalent of “HEROIN:”

“It's digital heroin – how two dimensional planes turn people into junkies - This addictive effect is why Dr. Peter Whybrow, director of neuroscience at UCLA, calls (TWO DIMENSIONAL) screens '(visual) cocaine' and Chinese researchers call them '(visual) heroin'...” Dr. Nicholas Kardaras

And that's because when Pablo Picasso put his two dimensional Flounder People in front of all of the Modern art world's very first aristocratic victims, for the very first time, and who – the aristocracy, had, remember, actually regressed back to point time zero, well, “It:” The two dimensional discordant Flounder people picture, was, a: “Novel stimulus” - “Some 'thing' they had never seen before” - “some thing COMPLETELY unexpected” - “DISCORD,” all rolled into one: The trifecta of “DOPAMINE.”

So, the master manipulating psychopathic con artists, said the word:

“Why Picasso is the Apex of Art – as another of the artist's works is sold for a stratospheric sum, the world is merely catching up with his originality and his genius - Let's give ourselves a pat on the back: we've got good taste. Picasso completely deserves his divine status as the god of art... ” Jonathan Jones

“ART” - Which was LITERALLY the equivalent of Pavlov “ringing his bell,” and then, they put Picasso's brand new novel stimulus, and completely unexpected, discordant, two dimensional Flounder People picture in front of their faces, and they LITERLLY “consumed ALL of the purely pleasurable dopamine,” and/or “DRUG,” and, then, well, that's exactly when all of the LITERAL “conditioning” began, and all of the trouble as well.

Because, OF COURSE, once you put a “brand new never before seen and completely unexpected novel stimulus” in front of someone, and/or a group of someones, well, then it is NO LONGER a “brand new never before seen and completely unexpected novel stimulus,” is it?

Of course it is NOT.

But, WHAT is it, STILL?

Well, this:

“Do you think even cockroaches feel some sort of emotion,' we asked neuroscientist Candace Pert. 'They have to,' because they have chemicals that put them in the mood to mate and chemicals that make them run away when they're about to be killed. That's what emotions are all about – pain and pleasure, punishment and reward. If you were wiring a little robot to walk into the future and survive, as God was when he designed human beings, you'd wire it up so that behavior that ensured the survival of the species would be naturally reinforcing. Behavior is controlled by the anticipation of pain and pleasure, punishment and reward. And that has to be coded in the brain...”

Yeah, it's: discord – noise – chaos – pain – suffering – death, as a matter of fact, and, remember, they even admit it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANqi-Lu ... .be&t=1296

And, again, that is EXACTLY when all of the conditioning, and trouble began.

Here's exactly why:

“Dopamine, however, is more than just a feel good molecule, it also exercises extraordinary power over learning and memory – Dopamine, like most biologically important drugs, must be kept within strict bounds – Addict's neurons assaulted by abnormally high levels of dopamine have responded defensively and reduced the number of sites, or receptors, to which dopamine can bind, so while addicts begin by taking drugs to feel high, they end up taking them in order to not feel low...” J. Madeline Nash

Because, again, as they readily admit, THIS is all “cubism” actually is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANqi-Lu ... .be&t=1296

Yeah, so it – obviously, has ABSOLUTELY no intrinsic value, of any and/or all kinds, and so, obviously of course, that was when all of the factual master manipulating psychopathic conning, and lying, actually began, as the factual liars, ALL began saying things like this:

“Cubism was, and is, the most revolutionary and profoundly beautiful modern art movement. It was discovered – for once, it makes sense to speak of an artistic idea being 'discovered' like a scientific (and mathematical) truth – by Picasso before the first world war. His insight was complex. A painting does not have to show reality from a single point of view, as pictorial artists did from the 1400s to the late 19th century. Our eyes move about all the time, inside our restless bodies. So a cubist painting captures a series of perceptions all in one assaying of an object.” Jonathan Jones

Yeah, they all began to “lie,” and began to effect their psychopathic master manipulation, and began to brainwash the world into believing that Picasso's cubist pictures were “like four dimensional math,” just like this:

"Following the development of Mathematics, where spaces with more than three dimensions are routinely addressed, the unfathomable, metaphysical character of possibly unperceived dimensions attracted wider attention and, not surprisingly, some of these mathematical ideas found their way towards artistic expression - From this point of view, Picasso's paintings represent a pathway from 4D space, towards 3D space, and then towards 2D space (the canvas surface)..." Theodor Pavlopoulous

And then, every time I would ask them for this:

“Proofs are not abstract. There is no such thing as proving something abstractly – One can, of course, define a class of abstract entities and call them 'proof,' but those 'proofs' can not verify mathematical statements because no one can see them...” David Deutsch

They would all only prove that they were, indeed, master manipulating lying psychopathic con artists, by doing this:

“Lying, deceiving, and manipulation are natural talents for psychopaths. With their powers of imagination in gear and focused on themselves, psychopaths appear amazingly unfazed by the possibility, or even the certainty, of being found out. When caught in a lie or challenged with the truth, they are seldom perplexed or embarrassed, they simply change their stories or attempt to rework the facts so that they appear to be consistent with the lie...The psychopath is completely egocentric, valuing others only for their enhancement of their own pleasure or status. Many psychopaths love to be admired and bask in the adulation of others. Not only do they covet power, but they gain special pleasure in usurping and taking from others - This is how psychopaths operate. They will deny reality until their victims have a nervous breakdown. Often, the psychopath will turn on the victim and claim that the victim suffers from 'delusions' and is not mentally stable...” Dr. Robert Hare

And NEVER providing any of this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E_PQiqW9Fk

An actual explanation of, and DEMONSTRATION OF, the “MATH.”

Because there is no such thing, of course.

Alright, so I don't know if you all have ever actually had to witness someone actually die because of an addiction, and to “heroin,” but I have, and over the course of quite some time, and struggle as well.

So, because I witnessed it, this is what I know: A person consumes the drug – of a certain “power,” and such as a “discordant – low level, two dimensional Flounder People Picasso picture,” and/or something like marijuana, and the “consumption of the dopamine inducing stimulus,” gets you “high,” but, then, when you come back down, you come down little “lower” than before you consumed the drug, as your “receptors” begin to become “less sensitive” to the “same amount of stimulus,” and, so, of course, if you do not curtail the unbalanced consumption of the stimulus, you need to “consume a stronger and larger amount of the stimulus,” to SIMPLY enable you to FEEL "normal," and which is exactly “what” happened to the Art World all through the twentieth century, as they became both addicted, and brain dead, and brain washed as well.

So, immediately after Picasso, we had people like the “Abstractionists,” and “Dadaists,” and who were all simply turning up the “volume” – and “power,” of their provocateur psychopathic inarticulated cries for attention, which is all it all actually is, actually, and as they did LITERLLY “turn up the volume,” just like this:

http://www.wassily-kandinsky.org/

Yeah, they literally began to “turn up the volume” - of the “pure discord.”

Because, of course, and obviously, when Picasso produced his discordant two dimensional Flounder People pictures, they were still, kind of, “human” - “ISH,” and so, the “discord” was, still, relatively low level, but, as the patron's receptors had begun to become worn out, and so, of course, the master manipulating lying psychopathic con artists drug dealers, and/or the Art World, had to “increase the dosage of the drug,” and/or create “LOUDER” discord, for their victims to be exposed to.

And, of course, which was also, and remember, while they were STILL supplying their ”basic formula,” of: Novel stimulus – Unexpected – Discord, and which continued, BUT while in addition to THIS:

“Don't believe the hype about contemporary art...” Jonathan Jones

Yeah, all of the “hype,” and which - “HYPE,” is – literally, the single most powerful natural dopamine inducing phenomenon known to mankind, and/or simply becoming the center of attention, and/or this:

“Dopamine can be elevated by a – WORD OF PRAISE...”

But, OF COURSE, which was as the PURE DRUG, and/or dopamine, was being supplemented with this:

"Marketing Modern Art in America: From the Armory Show to the Department Store In seeking an explanation for the growth of the modern art market in the United States, critics invariably call on the 1913 Armory Show. Soon after the Armory closed its doors on the still-glistening trophies of modern art, galleries started opening theirs. While such broad claims are immediately suspect, how much did the organizers of the Armory Show welcome the 'contaminating' marketplace where art became nothing but another commodity - (The art community) recognition of the usefulness of marketing strategies borrowed from other 'shows,' such as Barnum's Circus and Buffalo Bill's Wild West Shows that advertised so loudly they refused to be ignored...” Marketing Modern art In America

The mass brain washing.

And, of course, remember how I said there was NEVER anyone who had simply “bought a picture,” already made, and/or an “art museum,” and/or an Art Gallery,” well, there was NEVER, all through history, no such thing, ALL through history, the lying master manipulating psychopathic con artists invented them, at the beginning of the twentieth century, because, without them, NO ONE is “buying,” THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1X4tkpP_F0

And, because, remember, you guys said exactly why:

“BadgerJelly: Being courteous to people does not involve calling them, and I quote, 'You lying sack of shit."


Alright, now this is where the really devious part comes in.

Because, NONE of ANY of it exists, by the “power” of the actual, top notch, psychopaths, and/or the people who can actually afford: Picasso – Pollock – etc, etc, etc.

So, during the twentieth century, the actual Art High Priests and Priesteeses, and such as Clement Greenberg, began to target, and literally, brain wash, all of the succeeding generations of young, impressionable, intelligentsia, and, actually, form a “cult,” which enabled, and enables, ALL the rest of it.

Because what Greenberg simply told his impressionable, and vulnerable, intelligentsia, was this:

“Clement Greenberg was an English major - Writing at the end of the avant-garde in Europe, Greenberg explained the significance of the avant-garde tradition. He defined the avant-garde as a 'superior consciousness' which coincided with the emergence of modern scientific thinking. As a force for cultural critique, avant-garde art separated itself from the bourgeois masses. This separation included the artists’ separation from subject matter and content and an adherence to art-for-art’s-sake - 'Ultimately, it can be said that the values which the cultivated spectator derives from Picasso are derived as the result of reflection upon the immediate impression left by the plastic values. It is only then that the recognizable, the miraculous and the sympathetic enter. They are not immediately or externally present in Picasso's painting, but must be projected into it by the spectator sensitive enough to react sufficiently to plastic qualities. They belong to the 'reflected' effect. In realism, on the other hand, the 'reflected' effect has already been included in the picture, ready for the spectator's unreflective enjoyment - which the insensitive, ignorant masses can access with little effort - In the end the peasant will go back to kitsch and pop when he feels like looking at pictures, for he can enjoy kitsch and pop without effort, which reduces pop art for the masses to nothing more than demagogy...”

Yeah, he brain washed his young, impressionable intelligentsia into believing that they were “special,” and that they had “special seeing capabilities,” just like Picasso, and that they should – simultaneously, reject demagoguery, except, of course all of that is INFINITELY backwards.

But all along, all of the: lying – conning – psychopathic master manipulating – power of stimulus being increased – drug addiction growing – receptors being destroyed – etc, continued, and continued, and continued.

Until, we reached Pollock, with THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df94RpS-_s8

And, all along, all of the “consumer's” actual “neural receptors” were becoming LESS SENSATIVE, and LESS SENSATIVE, and LESS SENSATIVE, to all of the “discordant” visual stimulus, as, simultaneously, ALL of “volume,” and “power,” of ALL of the “drugs” was being increased, as, simultaneously, this was happening:

“The addicts started out as occasional users, but over time the dopamine consumption hijacked their minds – Causing damage within their pre-frontal cortices, the area of the mind responsible for controlling irrational behavior, AND empathy..” Sandra Blakeslee – New York Times

Yeah, their uniquely human cerebral cortices were becoming destroyed, and so was their ability to “control irrational behavior,” AND their ability to experience “empathy,” AS they were becoming incapable of being effected by, and/or caring about anything, EXCEPT for their consumption of pure dopamine inducing discord, and simultaneously becoming brain washed, and a part of a cult, and which EXACTLY explains THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wn7zvv0PSbU&t=90s

As well, as a matter of scientific fact, and, as all of Hitler's victims, were “high” on, guess what?

Well, Pervitin, and/or “DOPAMINE:”

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/ ... -interview

So, as a matter of scientific fact, THIS “con” explains EVERY “con” in the ENTIRE history of the ENTIRE world, so – yeah, it is MORE “evil” than Hitler's “con,” and actually responsible for it as well, and/or EXACTLY “how” Hitler was able to LITERALLY “brain wash” his victims into becoming capable of actually contradicting the most basic law of nature, of course, and again as a matter of scientific fact.

And so, as the “victims” of the Fine Art World continued being the actual desensitized victims, their master manipulation, and/or the effecting of the pure “offensiveness,” and literal power of the "drug," had to be continuously turned up, and turned up, and turned up, and, until they actually produced pure, uncut - heroin grade, “offensiveness,” with this:

https://www.artsy.net/artwork/robert-ma ... -with-whip

Of course.

And then, it just continued, as it, ALL OF THE: discord – noise – pain – suffering – vulgarity – offensiveness – etc, continued, until it completely consumed the ENTIRE world.

As they: The Fine Art World, did the SINGLE most “OFFENSIVE” thing, cognitively - "intellectually," in the ENTIRE history of the ENTIRE world, or THIS:

“Piss Christ is a 1987 photograph by the American artist and photographer Andres Serrano. It depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank of the artist's urine. The piece was a winner of the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art's 'Awards in the Visual Arts' competition – it was financed with public funds...” Wikipedia

And by your own admission, remember?
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 24th, 2017, 2:49 pm 

Alright, so to clarify, everyone, here, readily acknowledges the exact way pictorial cognition functions, a person, person A, draws/paints/takes a picture of, a: “Ball,” and then, when a second person, Person B, and/or “patron” of whatever, and/or wherever: “Art museum” - “Art Gallery” - “street sign” - “magazine” – “someone's wall,” looks at the two dimensional pictorial representation of Ball, the second person, B, can “cognize:” “Ball,” within their own mind, and, ergo, person A will have effectually communicated – two dimensionally and pictorially, the concept of “Ball.”

And also everyone here readily admits that there is absolutely no such thing as “Super Michael's Theory Of Picture Super Powers,” and/or, my claim, that if I - “Super Mike,” were to draw a picture, such as this:

http://www.awdsgn.com/dailyjournal/jul0 ... 070209.htm

Then, by my simply “drawing” that “two dimensional pictorial representation" of a person like being wearing a Super Cape and "flying,” well, then that “proved” that I could fly, and, of course, because I am not a “moron,” and/or “feeble minded:”

“Feeble minded: unable to make intelligent decisions or judgments - stupid, idiotic, imbecilic, foolish, witless, doltish, empty-headed, vacuous - moronic, dumb, dim, dopey, dippy; daft...”

And/or “daft,” I would NEVER simply “Put on my Super Cape and walk off a building,” in an attempt to “prove” to the world, that, because I could simply draw a picture of myself with my Super Cape on "flying,” well then that proved that I could walk off a building and Fly like a Superman, and/or a Übermensch:

“The Übermensch - German for Superman, Superhuman, is a concept in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. In his 1883 book Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche has his character Zarathustra posit the Übermensch as a goal for humanity to set for itself - The term Übermensch was utilized frequently by Hitler and the Nazi regime to describe their idea of a biologically superior Aryan or Germanic master race - The thought of Nietzsche had an important influence in anarchist authors - Zarathustra ties the Übermensch to the death of God. Nietzsche introduces the concept of the Übermensch in contrast to his understanding Christianity - 'God is dead' means that the idea of God can no longer provide values. With the sole source of values no longer capable of providing those values, there is a real chance of nihilism prevailing - Nihilism is a philosophical doctrine that suggests the lack of belief in one or more reputedly meaningful aspects of life. Most commonly, nihilism is presented in the form of existential nihilism, which argues that life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value. Moral nihilists assert that there is no inherent morality...” Wikipedia

But remember exactly who said that THEY could be like Übermensch, and/or “Supermen,” well the people who “Founded the concepts of Modern Art,” and/or The Church of the Big O, remember:

“Cezanne tried to make the ultimate journey back through time – Cezanne claimed to believe in his own sensations, moreover, he said so quite categorically; 'What counts is only mass' – This is an imaginary world which Cezanne could not have seen (in reality) – It is impossible to tell – We do not know – I could not tell – I could not decide – We do not know...Cezanne created a kind of space where one technique to create depth is canceled out by another – in other words, Cezanne is the painter of the distance that seems near – This was obviously against the rule of the constant observation point (but Cezanne couldn't understand that) – Cezanne was like a lion in Nietzche's sense, and rules mattered little to him...” Yvon Taillainder

Yeah, I don't know, but that sounds a little “daft” to me.

And, do you know EXACTLY who said that “people can be 'daft' if they fall for scams,” well, the EXACT same people who “scammed” the ENTIRE world, see:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GS1lg ... u.be&t=413

And, do you remember exactly what the definition of “feeble mindedness,” actually is, this:

“Critical Studies In Feeble Mindedness – Feeble-mindedness is a leading social problem which insistently claims the attention of all branches of social science...Only the highest grades of mental defectives can learn the three R's effectively. Binet and Simon once classified the grades of feeble-mindedness on this basis and claimed that, roughly, idiots cannot talk, imbeciles cannot read or write, and morons cannot deal with abstractions...” Edgar Doll

Which is literally an inability to experience pictorial cognition, and/or “abstract thinking,” and/or THE “Laws of nature,” and/or “reality” – Such as the scientific fact that, if an “artist” simply “Draws a picture of themselves flying,” that does NOT mean that they are “proving” they can actually “fly.”

And do you remember EXACTLY what the universal test for psychopathy is, well, this:

“Psychopaths seem to know the dictionary meanings of words but fail to comprehend or appreciate (OR 'experience') their emotional value or significance (while functioning as if) he knows the words but not the music. Recent laboratory research provides convincing support for these clinical observations. This research is based on evidence that, for normal people, neutral words generally convey less information (less understanding of reality) than do emotional words: A word such as PAPER has a dictionary meaning, whereas a word such as DEATH has a dictionary meaning plus emotional meaning, and unpleasant connotations. Emotional words have more 'punch' than do non emotional words. Picture yourself at a computer screen on which groups of letters are flashed for a second. Electrodes for recording brain responses have been attached to your scalp and connected to an EEG machine, which draws a graph of the electrical activity of the brain. Some of the groups of letters flashed up on the screen form common words found in the the dictionary; other strings no words, only nonsense syllables. For example, TREE forms a word but RETE does not. Your task is to push a button as quickly as possible whenever you have decided that a true word has appeared on the screen. The computer measures the time that it takes you to make your decisions; it also analyses your brain responses during the task. You will probably respond more quickly to an emotional word than to a neutral one. For example, you would probably push the button quicker at the word DEATH than the word PAPER. The emotional content (and real word) seem to give the words a sort of 'turbo-boost' to the decision making process. At the same time, the emotional words evoke larger brain responses than do neutral words – When we used this laboratory test with prison inmates, the non-psychopaths showed the normal pattern of response – BUT the psychopaths did NOT: They responded to emotional words as if they were neutral words – to a psychopath, a word is just a word...” Dr. Robert

And do you all remember EXACTLY how Adolf Hitler became capable of brain washing HIS victims, by “softening them up” with DOPAMINE, while – simultaneously, allowing them to become a “part of the in crowd,” and/or the “US,” that are being allowed to THIS:

“They are always on the lookout for new stimulation. These people are quick to weary of everything; they want variety, and they are never able to feel the needs of their fellow man – Anyone that wants to win the broad masses must know the key that opens the door to their heart: propaganda tries to force a doctrine on the whole people. The whole art consists in doing this so skillfully that everyone will become convinced (that the propaganda is fact) – we must avoid excessive intellectual demands on our public – the receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, their power for forgetting is enormous. The progress and culture of humanity are not the product of the majority, but rest exclusively on the genius of the individual. Some idea of genius arises in the brain of a man who feels called upon to transmit his ideas to the rest of humanity. He preaches his view and gradually wins a certain circle of adherents. This process of direct and personal transmittance of a man's ideas to the rest of his fellow men is the most ideal and natural – In the place of committee decisions, the principle of absolute authority was introduced to ME – Adolf Hitler...” Mein Kamph

Yeah, Adolf Hitler's very own demagoguery.

And we – everyone here, ESPECIALLY, all know how much all intelligent people HATE, perhaps even loathe, demagoguery, because, look at what some of us have said:

“BadgerJelly: Rule by fear is not a legitimate way to rule anyone in my eyes. I despise authority.”

“Braininvat: As parents dwindle in their omnipotence and omniscience (as we grow out of small childhood), humans have a need to turn elsewhere for a sense of someone with such attributes. Deification is as natural as the patellar reflex, in humans...”


But yet, THE “Art World” can stand atop Mount Everest, and SHOUT this:

“Why Picasso is the apex of art As another of the artist's works is sold for a stratospheric sum, the world is merely catching up with his originality and genius – Picasso deserves his divine status as (our) god...” Jonathan Jones

And NOT one, single “intellectual,” in the entire world, says:”HEY, wait a minute...”

Here's exactly why:

“It's true spending money on art won't cure cancer, or stop children from dying, but is it not human to want both? A civilized society cares for the soul as well as the body – let us not neglect hearts and minds – We could stop spending money on Art, but wouldn't that be the most spiritually empty world to live in – There would be no Sistine Chapel without the Holy see...” The Guardian

Yeah, you see, they: The lying psychopathic con artists that perpetuated the SINGLE greatest con in the ENTIRE history of the world, simply did EXACTLY what Baudelaire said they would do, when he said this:

“Yesterday, across the crowd of the boulevard, I found myself touched by a mysterious Being I had always desired to know, and whom I recognized immediately, in spite of the fact that I had never seen him. He had, I imagined, in himself, relatively as to me, a similar desire, for he gave me, in passing, so significant a sign in his eyes that I hastened to obey him. I followed him attentively, and soon I descended behind him into a subterranean dwelling, astonishing to me as a vision, where shone a luxury of which none of the actual houses in Paris could give me an approximate example - There reigned an exquisite, an almost stifling atmosphere, which made one forget almost instantaneously all the fastidious horrors of life; there I breathed a somber sensuality, like that of opium smokers when, set on the shore of an enchanted island over which shone an eternal afternoon, they felt born in them, to the soothing sounds of melodious cascades - There were there strange faces of men and women, gifted with so fatal a beauty that I seemed to have seen them years ago and in countries which I failed to remember and which inspired in me that curious sympathy and that equally curious sense of fear that I usually discover in unknown aspects. If I wanted to define in some fashion or other the singular expression of their eyes, I would say that never had I seen such magic radiance more energetically expressing the immortal desire of feeling themselves alive - However, gambling, this superhuman pleasure, had cut, at various intervals, our copious libations, and I ought to say that I had gained and lost my soul, as we were playing, with a heroic carelessness and lightheartedness. The soul is so invisible a thing, often useless and sometimes so troublesome, that I did not experience, as to this loss, more than that kind of emotion I might have, had I lost my visiting card in the street - We talked of the universe, of its creation and of its future destruction; of the leading ideas of the century--that is to say, of progress and perfectibility--and, in general, of all kinds of human infatuations. On this subject His Highness was inexhaustible in his irrefutable jests, and he expressed himself with a splendor of diction and with a magnificence in drollery such as I have never found in any of the most famous conversationalists of our age - Finally, as the dark approached shivering, this famous personage, sung by so many poets and served by so many philosophers who work for his glory's sake without being aware of it, said to me: 'I want you to remember me always, and to prove to you that I – of whom one says so much evil, am often enough bon diable, to make use of one of your vulgar locutions. So as to make up for the irremediable loss that you have made of your soul, I shall give you back the stake you ought to have gained, if your fate had been fortunate – that is to say, the possibility of solacing and of conquering, during your whole life, this bizarre affection of ennui, which is the source of all your maladies and of all your miseries. Never a desire shall be formed by you that I will not aid you to realize; you will reign over your vulgar equals; money and gold and diamonds, fairy palaces, shall come to seek you and shall ask you to accept them without your having made the least effort to obtain them; you can change your abode as often as you like; you shall have in your power all sensualities without lassitude, in lands where the climate is always hot and where the women are as scented as the flowers.' He complained in no way of the evil reputation under which he lived, indeed, all over the world, and he assured me that he himself was of all living beings the most interested in the destruction of Superstition, and he avowed to me that he had been afraid, relatively as to his proper power, once only, and that was on the day when he had heard a preacher, more subtle than the rest of the human herd, cry in his pulpit: 'My dear brethren, do not ever forget, when you hear the progress of lights praised, that the loveliest trick of the Devil is to persuade you that he does not exist!' With this he rose and said good-by to me with a charming smile.”

Yeah that old Devil Satan, he actually did it, he got the majority of world to actually “Sell their souls,” and/or THIS:

“One thing has become clear to scientists: memory is absolutely crucial to our consciousness. Says Janellen Huttenlocher, a professor of psychology at the University of Chicago: There's almost nothing you do, from perception to thinking, that doesn't draw continuously on your memory. It can't be otherwise, since there's really no such thing as the present. As you read this sentence, the sentence that went before is already a second or two in the past; the first line of this story went by minutes ago. Yet without a memory of what's been said, none of what you are now reading makes the slightest sense. The same is true for our lives as a whole. Memory provides personal context, a sense of self and a sense of familiarity with people and surroundings, a past and present and a frame for the future. But even as psychologists and brain researchers have learned to appreciate memory's central role in our mental lives, they have come to realize that memory is not a single phenomenon. 'We do not have a memory system in the brain,' says James McGaugh, director of the Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory at the University of California, Irvine. 'We have memory systems, each playing a different role – All of these different systems are ultimately stored in the brain's cortex. What's happening when you form memory is that its the connections between nerve cells – particularly the strength of those connections, that are altered by experience, as nerve cells are firing simultaneously and coordinating different sets of information – When everything is going right, these different systems work together seamlessly. If you're taking a bicycle ride, for example, the memory of how to operate the bicycle comes from one set of neurons; the memory of how to get from one side of the town to another (and WHILE 'passing' trees) comes from another; the nervous feeling you have left over from taking a bad spill last time out comes from still another (set of neurons) - But you are never aware that your memory has been formed, bit by bit, like some invisible edifice inside your brain'...” Michael D. Lemonick Time

Their “universally applicable empirical self consciousness,” and/or the acquired knowledge that all of mankind can have in common gathered through our uniquely human senses, and three dimensional parallel functioning mind and central nervous system, AND, meaning, that the three dimensional mind IS “parallel functioning:”

“Parallel Processing: is the ability of the brain to do many things at once. For example, when a person sees an object, they don't see just one thing, but rather many different aspects that together help the person identify the object as a whole. For example, you may see the colors red, black, and silver. These colors alone may not mean too much, but if you also see shapes such as rectangles, circles, and curved shapes, your brain may perceive all the elements simultaneously, put them together and identify it as a car. Note that motion and depth of the object can also be perceived. These cues processed in the brain tell the person that the red car is headed straight at them so they jump out of the way. Without parallel processing, the brain would have to process each aspect of the car separately in progression. By the time the person identified the car, it would be too late..”

And that ability to function “in parallel,” is what differeniates us human beings, from “mindless automatons” and/or “robots,” and/or “computers:”

“Neurons are quite slow compared to the transistors in a computer. A neuron collects inputs from its synapses, and combines these inputs together to decide when to output a spike to other neurons. A typical neuron can do this and reset itself in about five milliseconds (5 ms), or around two hundred times per second. This may seem fast, but a modern silicon-based computer can do one billion operations in a second. This means a basic computer operation is five million times faster than the basic operation in your brain! That is a very, very big difference. So how is it possible that a brain could be faster and more powerful than our fastest digital computers? 'No problem,' say the brain-as-computer people. 'The brain is a parallel computer. It has billions of cells all computing at the same time. This parallelism vastly multiplies the processing power of the biological brain."

And, well, we know Old Gertrude Stein readily admitted that SHE had, absolutely NO problem with “selling her soul,” and “getting” literally “everything” for DOING “absolutely nothing,” see, she actually admitted it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GS1lg ... .be&t=1780

But now, we can know, for a “scientific fact” that Old Gertrude simply got all of HER “victims” to, literally, and simply, and factually actually, “Sell their Souls,” as well, and because, well, there simply is absolutely NO SUCH THING AS THIS:

http://www.pablo-ruiz-picasso.net/work-2172.php

ANYWHERE, “in” HERE:

“One thing has become clear to scientists: memory is absolutely crucial to our consciousness. Says Janellen Huttenlocher, a professor of psychology at the University of Chicago: There's almost nothing you do, from perception to thinking, that doesn't draw continuously on your memory. It can't be otherwise, since there's really no such thing as the present - Memory provides personal context, a sense of self and a sense of familiarity with people and surroundings, a past and present and a frame for the future - But you are never aware that your memory has been formed, bit by bit, like some invisible edifice inside your brain'...” Michael D. Lemonick Time

So it, ALL Picassos, and ALL:

“The romantic concept of genius is the foundation stone of the modern and postmodern concept of the 'fineness' of fine art. Without it the ability of the fine art institution to create its canon of 'great artists' and the capacity of the art market to sell faeces and urinals as precious objects would collapse - By the time of Picasso the romantic myth of genius became tool whereby dealers could 'explain' the strangeness of creative products such as Cubism - Only the mystique of genius casts a veil over the underlying commodity status...” artintelligence – Graham Coulter-Smith

“Modern Art,” has ABSOLUTLY, and scientifically and factually, NOTHING to do with any human “consciousness,” and/or a human being's “soul,” and/or “genius,” again as a matter of scientific fact.

And, we also now know, for a scientific fact, that, well:

“Candace Pert: We've measure opiate receptors in everything from fruit fly heads to human brains. Even unicellular organisms have peptides – they're little robots that go for sugar at all costs, and away from salt...”

Even an amoeba can respond to a “dopamine inducing novel stimulus,” so, it: a Human Being's “soul,” can NOT be that: SEX, and/or THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4v1ywo ... u.be&t=600

Simply allowing yourself to become brain washed into joining some kind of “Joy Division Cult,” while becoming absolutely mindless, and standing in front of your “worldly god figure,” such as Jeff Koons, who is supplying you with all of your “Shock (Top),” excessive, and unbridled, purely pleasurable dopamine inducing stimulus, and/or: Sex, and while simultaneously being COMPLETELY devoid of any “Saltines,” and/or “Salt,” and/or “Light of truth,” and while – simultaneously, conning you into believing that you have actually gained access to the “Heaven,” simply because that worldly cult leader told you he could “remove your guilt,” and/or that HE is “God,” because that's simply the definition of a literal orgy, and/or this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qB3El5 ... .be&t=7991

And THAT can't be a Human Being's “soul,” because, remember, according to Baudelaire, Satan said that THAT was, literally, the very definition of “selling your soul:”

“I want you to remember me always, and to prove to you that I – of whom one says so much evil, am often enough bon diable, to make use of one of your vulgar locutions. So as to make up for the irremediable loss that you have made of your soul, I shall give you back the stake you ought to have gained, if your fate had been fortunate – that is to say, the possibility of solacing and of conquering, during your whole life, this bizarre affection of ennui, which is the source of all your maladies and of all your miseries. Never a desire shall be formed by you that I will not aid you to realize; you will reign over your vulgar equals; money and gold and diamonds, fairy palaces, shall come to seek you and shall ask you to accept them without your having made the least effort to obtain them; you can change your abode as often as you like; you shall have in your power all sensualities without lassitude...”

As well, and of course.

And, remember, they: The Founding Chief Priests and Priestesses, that founded the Church of the Big O, and/or Modern Art, simply admitted that THAT – Baudelaire's advice, encouragement, and business mode, and/or philosophy, was EXACTLY “what” they applied:

“Modernism celebrated innovation and originality. Baudelaire had conceived of modernism as a radical break from the historic traditions that preceded it. He saw it as an era characterized by a quest for novelty; he emphasized the artist's 'burning desire to create a personal form of originality.' A hundred years after Baudelaire, American critic Harold Rosenberg was still espousing what he called 'the tradition of the new.'..as modernism progressed, painting became more reduced, more abstract, and more distant from lived experience. In the twentieth century, American critic Clement Greenberg argued painting should be reduced to its prime characteristic: its essential flatness..” High Modernism: The Avant-Garde in the Early 20th Century

And, well, the definition of a Human Being's “soul” can not, possibly, be simply, abstractly, “communicating something,” because, remember, you guys said that you understood that even an “animal” can do THAT:

“Ecolgite: I do not understand what you are trying to say. All animals communicate. We know this. Some animals have a richly textured form of communication, some of which is instinctive and some of which is learned. We know this. Some animals can create pictures of a kind. We know this. Humans can create pictures - 2D representations of 3D objects - and take it a stage further, creating metaphors of emotions. We know this. So what are you saying, in that first post, that we don't already know.”


So, let me tell you something that NOBODY knows, yet, and that is, how, EXACTLY, they: The biggest lying psychopathic con artists in the entire history of the entire world, were actually able to pull off the biggest collective con in the entire history, of the entire world.

Well, THIS is how:

“Under pressure from Pope Julius II, Michelangelo finished the Sistine ceiling in tremendous haste. The vault was unveiled officially on 31 October 1512, the eve of All Saints, and was the subject of widespread admiration. Michelangelo was left exhausted by this titanic work – The Sistine became, according to Georgio Vasari, a form of 'academy of drawing,' for artists visiting Rome who saw it as a mandatory starting point of reference – 'At the unveiling, people came running from all the corners of the earth; this great work stopped them in amazement, left them wondering and lost for words. The Pope, his greatness fed by this success which encouraged him to further initiatives, rewarded Michelangelo with money and splendid presents...” Michelangelo Pierluigi Vecchi

Yeah, Pope Julius The Second.

And do you all know who, exactly, Pope Julius The Second actually was?

Well, THIS was Pope Julius The Second:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6OT2TqZnSs

Yeah, he was The “Warrior Pope,” and a real top notch, honest to goodness, master manipulating, and war mongering, psychopathic con artist demagogue, all right, and one of THESE as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enl51LjD6KA&t=663s

And HE was the one responsible for THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwl640Yc6JM

And this, as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oUqsGm9u94

And you all wanna know exactly who Giorgio Vasari actually was? Well, THIS was Giorgio Vasari:

“Giorgio Vasari was an Italian painter, architect, writer, and historian, most famous today for his Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects, considered the ideological foundation of art-historical writing - Often called 'the first art historian,' Vasari invented the genre of the encyclopedia of artistic biographies - The work has a consistent and notorious (and) without achieving a neutral point of view. Vasari's biographies are interspersed with amusing gossip...” Wikipedia

Yeah, THAT'S Giorgio Vasari, the guy that wrote the VERY FIRST “art propaganda” book, and/or propagandized “history of art.”

And Giorgio Vasari was famously, and notoriously, “biased,” and he was also a “humanist painter,” and/or an “ART” - “I” - “SAN,” actually, and he was also very good friends with Michelangelo, another humanist painter, and ALSO “ART” - “I” - “SAN,” as matter of scientific fact.

And THAT, the “fact” that Michelangelo WAS, actually, factually, and literally mathematically verifiably, NOTHING more than an “ART” - “I” - “SAN,” was the exact reason for this:

“Why Michelangelo Disliked Leonardo Da Vinci: Michelangelo and Leonardo felt 'an intense dislike for each other,' says their biographer Vasari. He doesn’t say why - There is only (a) story from an anonymous manuscript called the Codice Magliabecchiano – This makes Michelangelo look like a jealous ass. Perhaps he was...” The Best Artists

And also exactly why Michelangelo had NO CHOICE, but to live only for this:

“The Pope, his greatness fed by this success which encouraged him to further initiatives, rewarded Michelangelo with money and splendid presents...”

While actually “selling his soul,” as well, and while also remaining subservient to a lying psychopathic master manipulating, warmongering demagogue, and/or con artist, and who had ABSOLUTLY NO ONE'S “permission” to do THIS:

“Under pressure from Pope Julius II, Michelangelo finished the Sistine ceiling in tremendous haste. The vault was unveiled officially on 31 October 1512, the eve of All Saints, and was the subject of widespread admiration....”

And you wanna know how I know that?

Well, I asked HIS boss, and HE told me, that's how.

See, HE said so, right HERE:

“No servant can be the slave of two masters: he will either hate the first and love the second, or treat the first with respect, and the second with scorn. You cannot be the slave of both God and money.” Luke 16: 13

“The Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and laughed at him. He said to them, 'You are the very ones that pass yourselves off as virtuous in people's sight, but God knows your hearts. For what is thought highly of by men, is loathsome in the sight of God.” Luke 16:14-11

See, Pope Julius's Boss said so, right there.

And so, we can know know, for a scientific, and historical, fact, that Pope Julius The Second, allowed HIMSELF to become one of these:

“I want you to remember me always, and to prove to you that I – of whom one says so much evil, am often enough bon diable, to make use of one of your vulgar locutions. So as to make up for the irremediable loss that you have made of your soul, I shall give you back the stake you ought to have gained, if your fate had been fortunate – that is to say, the possibility of solacing and of conquering, during your whole life, this bizarre affection of ennui, which is the source of all your maladies and of all your miseries. Never a desire shall be formed by you that I will not aid you to realize; you will reign over your vulgar equals; money and gold and diamonds, fairy palaces, shall come to seek you and shall ask you to accept them without your having made the least effort to obtain them; you can change your abode as often as you like; you shall have in your power all sensualities without lassitude...”

Yeah, Pope Julius The Second allowed himself to become one of Satan's minions, and, actually, Pope Julius The Second, not only allowed himself to become one of Satan's minions, but he allowed HIMSELF to become Satan's number one minion.

Because, Pope Julius The Second, was the one responsible for allowing THIS to happen:

“He complained in no way of the evil reputation under which he lived, indeed, all over the world, and he assured me that he himself was of all living beings the most interested in the destruction of Superstition, and he avowed to me that he had been afraid, relatively as to his proper power, once only, and that was on the day when he had heard a preacher, more subtle than the rest of the human herd, cry in his pulpit: 'My dear brethren, do not ever forget, when you hear the progress of lights praised, that the loveliest trick of the Devil is to persuade you that he does not exist!”

Yeah, you see, I told you all, I was gonna actually do, this:

“If I had not come,
If I had not spoken to them,
they would have been blameless;
but as it is they have no excuse for their sin.
Anyone who hates me hates the Father.
If I had not performed such work among themselves
as no one else has ever done
they would be blameless;
but as it is, they have seen all this,
and still they hate both me and my Father.
But all this was only to fulfill the words written in their Law:
They hated me for no reason.
When the Advocate comes,
whom I shall send to you from the Father,
the Spirit of Truth who issues from the Father,
he will be my witness.” John 15: 22-26

And this, as well:

“Do not be afraid of them therefore. For everything that is now covered will be uncovered, and everything now hidden will be made clear. What I say to you in the dark, tell in the daylight, what you hear in whispers, proclaim from the housetops.” Matthew 10: 26-27

So, let me make clear EXACTLY how, because of Pope Julius The Second, and his building of The Sistine Chapel, they – all of Satan's minions, the “self proclaimed Satan's minions,” remember:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GS1lg ... .be&t=1706

Became capable of doing it.

So, this is how they became capable of doing it, by simply taking THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNaXQQbcgw0

And combining that, with this:

“Under pressure from Pope Julius II, Michelangelo finished the Sistine ceiling in tremendous haste. The vault was unveiled officially on 31 October 1512, the eve of All Saints, and was the subject of widespread admiration....”

And/or, this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oUqsGm9u94

And combining THAT, with this:

“Neuroscientist Candace Pert – 'I see the brain in terms of quantum mechanics - We make maps, but we should never confuse the map with the territory – If god speaks to man, if man speaks to God, it would be through the frontal cortex...”

And combining THAT, with this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swarthmore_College

Yeah, remember me telling you all I had a brother that went to Swarthmore College, and to look for the clues?

And, if you had, you would have seen this:

"...Solomon Asch was a noted psychologist who became professor at Swarthmore."

And remember too I asked you NOT to let yourselves become capable of “conforming” to ANY demagoguery?

You know, “conforming,” exactly as Solomon Asch demonstrated, like THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyDDyT1lDhA

And/or The Asch Conformity Experiment, and/or “sugar.”

Functioning in conjunction with the Milgram Experiment, and/or “salt:”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzd6Ew3TraA

Yeah, that explains it all.

It explains exactly how the world could EVER get to the point where they could become so effected by, this:

“They are always on the lookout for new stimulation. These people are quick to weary of everything; they want variety, and they are never able to feel the needs of their fellow man – Anyone that wants to win the broad masses must know the key that opens the door to their heart: propaganda tries to force a doctrine on the whole people. The whole art consists in doing this so skillfully that everyone will become convinced (that the propaganda is fact) – This process of direct and personal transmittance of a man's ideas to the rest of his fellow men is the most ideal and natural – In the place of committee decisions, the principle of absolute authority was introduced to ME – Adolf Hitler...” Mein Kampf

That they would allow themselves to become responsible, for this:

“Piss Christ is a 1987 photograph by the American artist and photographer Andres Serrano. It depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank of the artist's urine. The piece was a winner of the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art's 'Awards in the Visual Arts' competition – it was financed with public funds...” Wikipedia

And while we all know, this:

“Braininvat: Heidegger did provoke thought with his 'temporality' concept, but I haven't much warmed up to his whole being-over-thinking stuff. His anti-semitism and enthusiastic participation in the Nazi party are not endearing features. I don't think he understood at the time where Nazism was going, but for a philosopher to be so oblivious is pretty inexcusable.”


That we ALL should be able to read THESE:

“He said again to the crowds, 'When you see a cloud looming up in the west you say at once that rain is coming, and so it does. And when the wind is from the south you say it will be hot, and it is. Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the face of the earth and the sky. How is it that you don't know how to interpret these times?” Luke 13: 54 -56

Signs of the times.

And by your own admission, remember:

Alright, so to clarify, everyone, here, readily acknowledges the exact way pictorial cognition functions, a person, person A, draws/paints/takes a picture of, a: “Ball,” and then, when a second person, Person B, and/or “patron” of whatever, and/or wherever: “Art museum” - “Art Gallery” - “street sign” - “magazine” – “someone's wall,” looks at the two dimensional pictorial representation of Ball, the second person, B, can “cognize:” “Ball,” within their own mind, and, ergo, person A will have effectually communicated – two dimensionally and pictorially, the concept of “Ball.”
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 25th, 2017, 2:27 pm 

Alright, so let's look at what we know, abstractly, so far.

We know that everyone here has acknowledged the existence of s de facto function of pictorial cognition, again, as everyone here has acknowledged, such as Eclogite:

Ecolgite: I do not understand what you are trying to say. All animals communicate. We know this. Some animals have a richly textured form of communication, some of which is instinctive and some of which is learned. We know this. Some animals can create pictures of a kind. We know this. Humans can create pictures - 2D representations of 3D objects - and take it a stage further, creating metaphors of emotions. We know this. So what are you saying, in that first post, that we don't already know.”


And we also know, that, this guy:

“Piss Christ is a 1987 photograph by the American artist and photographer Andres Serrano. It depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank of the artist's urine. The piece was a winner of the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art's 'Awards in the Visual Arts' competition – it was financed with public funds...” Wikipedia

Andres Serrano, enabled himself to become capable of “convincing,” first, some people to enable themselves to call him an “Artist,” and, then, to enable himself to also, AFTER convincing some people into calling him an “Artist,” to, then, become capable of convincing a large percentage, actually, the “Majority,” of Americans into, actually, “breaking the law,” by convincing the Majority of Americans into giving him, Andres Serrano, some “public funds,” so that he - “Andres Serrano,” could produce, well, according to an “Art Expert,” Lucy Lippard, THIS:

“Since 1984, Andres Serrano has developed a complex iconography that simultaneously exorcises the artist's experiences of Catholicism, criticizes the commercialization of sacred imagery, and pays idiosyncratic homage to the ideas that Christ originally stood for..” Lucy Lippard

Yeah, THAT'S “illegal.”

See:

“First amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...”

It: “Piss Christ,” according to the “Art Expert,” Lucy Lippard - “Piss Christ - pays idiosyncratic homage to the ideas that Christ originally stood for,” factually, VIOLATES The First Amendment, just like THIS “violates the First Amendment:”

“Judge Orders Removal of Plaque From Courthouse in Pennsylvania: A federal judge Wednesday ordered the removal of an 82-year-old Ten Commandments plaque from the Chester County Courthouse, calling it an unconstitutional display of the biblical text.” A.P.

And this, as well:

“Oklahoma Supreme Court orders removal of Ten Commandments - The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the state must remove a 6-foot tall granite monument of the Ten Commandments from its capitol because it violates the state's constitutional ban against the use of public funds or property to benefit a religion..”

Alright, so let's look at the historical, “communicable,” Jesus of Nazareth, and who he was.

So, we know this about him, historically:

“And he began to teach them that the Son of Man was destined to suffer grievously, to be rejected by the elders and the chief priests and scribes, and to be put to death, and after three days to rise again; and he said all this quite openly.” Mark 27: 20-21

Alright, so we know that, historically, Jesus was defined as “The Son of Man,” so, maybe this is what Andres Serrano was trying to effectually communicate.

And we also know, historically, that Jesus of Nazareth, said that he “knew” that he would “suffer grievously,” and be: Betrayed – Belittled – Manacled – Beaten – Spat Upon – Ridiculed – Tortured, and actually “hung upon a cross to die,” just like a “rabble.”

Alright, so let's look at what, historically, Jesus actually did that was so “radical,” well, this:

“One of the scribes had listened to them debating and had observed how well Jesus answered them, now came up and put a question to him, 'Which is the first of all commandments?' Jesus replied, 'This is the first: Listen, Israel, the Lord our God is the one Lord, and you must love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind and all your strength. The second is this: You must love your neighbor as yourself. There is no greater commandment than these.” Mark 12: 28-32

Wow, that is some radical stuff alright.

So, maybe that's what Andres Serrano was so angry about.

Alright, so what else did Jesus do, well, this:

“Alas for you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You who pay your tithe of mint and dill and cumin and have neglected the weightier matters of the Law – justice mercy, good faith! These you should have practiced, without neglecting the others. You blind guides! Straining out gnats and swallowing camels!

Alas for you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You who clean the outside of the cup and dish but inside are full of of extortion and intemperance. Blind Pharisee! Clean the inside of the cup and dish first so that the outside may become clean as well.

Alas for you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You who are like whitewashed tombs that look handsome on the outside, but inside are full of every kind of corruption. In the same way you appear to people from the outside like good honest men, but inside are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness!” Matthew 23: 23-28

Oh, well, there you go, Jesus exposed the lying, master manipulating, psychopathic con artists, and all their lying practices.

So, maybe that's what Andres Serrano was trying to “make a religious statement about,” you know, that one that Lucy Lippard was adamant about, in “April, 1990.”

Hmm, but that's kind of weird, because, THIS is “what” Lucy Lippard said, in, about, 1989:

“...Seranno is an urban artist of considerable political sophistication – In High Art, the word 'moral' is usually considered laughable – juxtaposition is Serrano's genius, he understands that there are always certain factions that will always try to ensure that audiences don't think for themselves – his work shows that conventional notion of good taste with which we are raised, and educated, is based on an illusion of social order that is neither possible, nor desirable, to believe in...” Lucy Lippard

And which is what she “communicated,” abstractly, right about the time, this happened:

“In 1987, Serrano's Piss Christ caused a scandal when it was exhibited in 1989, with detractors, including United States Senators Al D'Amato and Jesse Helms, outraged that Serrano received $15,000 for the work, and $5,000 in 1986 from the taxpayer-funded National Endowment for the Arts.”

So, it looks like Andres Serrano's “Piss Christ,” accomplished EXACTLY what it was supposed to accomplish, this:

“The chief priests and elders, however, had persuaded the crowd to demand the release of Barabbas and the execution of Jesus. So when the governor spoke and asked them, 'Which of the two do you want me to release for you?' they said, 'Barabbas.' But in that case,' Pilate said to them, 'what am I to do with Jesus who is called Christ?' they all said, 'Let him be crucified!' 'Why?' he asked. What harm has he done?” Matthew 27: 20-23

Or, the manifestation, of Adolf Hitler's Philosophy made manifest, and while effecting the Majority, as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPpdPkUINz8

Or, as Lucy Lippard said:”In high art the world 'moral' is usually considered 'laughable,” or, again, as Adolf Hitler communicated:”Freeing men from the dirty and degrading ideas of morality is my work,” and, of course, as those who were 'close' to him explained, Adolf Hitler, had become like:

“Momentum had driven him into an extreme position from which there was no escape – What has been so far the ultimate violence in history can also be described as a ghostly kind of production, performance art at its largest, impressing upon an otherwise inattentive public certain feelings and ideas. He was a tremendous salesman of ideas - Ernst Hafstaengel, describes the shapelessness at the root of Hitler's mesmerizing oratorical power: 'His brain was like a primordial jelly or ectoplasm which quivered in response to everything from its surroundings – You could never pin him down, say that he was this thing or that thing, it was all floating, without roots, intangible and mediumistic – He was like an airman lost in a fog, who has lost all contact with reality...” Michael Nelken

An “airman lost in a fog,” and who has “lost all touch with reality,” as well, as his mind was “floating, without roots,” TO “EARTH.”

You see, that's EXACTLY how I knew that the person responsible, for THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwl640Yc6JM

Was a “LIAR.”

You wanna know exactly how I knew that the person that was responsible for THAT, was a liar?

Well, because of THIS:

“Jesus left the Temple, and as he was going away his disciples came up to him to draw his attention to the Temple buildings. He said to them in reply, 'You see all these things? I tell you solemnly, not a single stone here will be left on another: everything will be destroyed.' And when he was sitting at the Mount of Olives the disciples came and asked him privately, 'Tell us, when is this going to happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and the end of the world?'

And Jesus answered them, 'Take care that no one deceives you; because many will come using my name and saying, 'I am the Christ,' and they will deceive many...” Matthew 24: 1-4

And because of this, as well:

“In the Second World War, the human central nervous system was freely compared with mechanical devices which exemplified the engineering device known as servo-loop – By elucidating the mathematical principles of such error-activated performance, the military Physiologists found they were printing out the engineering specifications for a human nervous system. By treating man as if he was part of a mechanical set-up, they began to discover the extent to which he as a whole is actually was one - The sensations which arise from muscle, joint and tendon are conveniently grouped under one heading not because of their anatomical source, but because they collaborate to provide the brain with a distinctive form of information. None of this information could be put to use unless it was firmly located against a fixed horizon; it would float about weightlessly in a vacuum. If you regard the body as an aircraft flying in a thick cloud, the proprioceptive system re-creates a scale model of a machine on the instrument board...” Jonathan Miller

Functioning, actually SIMULTANEOUSLY EFFECTUALLY FUNCTIONING, in “conjunction,” with THIS:

“One thing has become clear to scientists: memory is absolutely crucial to our consciousness. Says Janellen Huttenlocher, a professor of psychology at the University of Chicago: There's almost nothing you do, from perception to thinking, that doesn't draw continuously on your memory. It can't be otherwise, since there's really no such thing as the present. As you read this sentence, the sentence that went before is already a second or two in the past; the first line of this story went by minutes ago. Yet without a memory of what's been said, none of what you are now reading makes the slightest sense. The same is true for our lives as a whole. Memory provides personal context, a sense of self and a sense of familiarity with people and surroundings, a past and present and a frame for the future. But even as psychologists and brain researchers have learned to appreciate memory's central role in our mental lives, they have come to realize that memory is not a single phenomenon. 'We do not have a memory system in the brain,' says James McGaugh, director of the Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory at the University of California, Irvine. 'We have memory systems, each playing a different role – All of these different systems are ultimately stored in the brain's cortex. What's happening when you form memory is that its the connections between nerve cells – particularly the strength of those connections, that are altered by experience, as nerve cells are firing simultaneously and coordinating different sets of information – When everything is going right, these different systems work together seamlessly. If you're taking a bicycle ride, for example, the memory of how to operate the bicycle comes from one set of neurons; the memory of how to get from one side of the town to another (and WHILE 'passing' trees) comes from another; the nervous feeling you have left over from taking a bad spill last time out comes from still another (set of neurons) - But you are never aware that your memory has been formed, bit by bit, like some invisible edifice inside your brain'...” Michael D. Lemonick Time

Yeah, you see how good THESE guys got:

“Psychopaths move along a continuum of antisocial behavior. Their behavior always gets worse, never better. The psychopath is a rebel, a religious disobeyer of prevailing codes and standards ... a rebel without a cause, an agitator without a slogan, a revolutionary without a program; in other words, his rebelliousness is aimed to achieve goals satisfactory to him alone; he is incapable of exertions for the sake of others. All his efforts, under no matter what guise, represent investments designed to satisfy his immediate wishes and desires..”

Yeah, those guys: The lying, master manipulating, psychopathic con artists, that actually:

“Dopamine is a brain chemical that regulates movement, pleasure and motivation. When the dopamine system goes seriously awry, Dr. Nora Volkow said, people loose their excitement for life and can no longer move their limbs – The (consumers) started out as occasional users, but over time the drug hijacked their their natural dopamine systems – PET-scan images of recovering addicts reveal other striking changes, including a dramatically impaired ability to process glucose, the primary energy source for working neurons. Moreover, this impairment, is greatest in the prefrontal cortex – The prefrontal cortex is a dopamine rich area of the mind responsible for controlling impulsive and irrational behavior. Addicts, in fact, display many of the symptoms shown by patients who have suffered strokes to the prefrontal cortex. Damage to this region, University of Iowa neurologist Antonio Damasio and his colleagues have demonstrated, destroys the emotional compass that controls behaviors that a patent should know are unacceptable – But the biggest surprise is that another region of the brain responsible for spatial perception and sensation, which has never before been linked to dopamine abuse, was hyperactive and showed signs of scarring – the study's biggest surprise was that the (dopamine consumers) parietal lobes, the parts of the brain responsible for feeling sensation and for RECOGNIZING where the body IS IN SPACE, were metabolically hyperactive, Dr. Volkow said, It is the equivalent of an inflammation or scarring response...”

“High jacked” the universally applicable empirical self consciousness of mankind, and/or simply consciousness, you know, THIS:

“One way to think about this new vision of time, is to imagine spatial relationships as a kind of universal language that the brain uses no matter what specific language we are using at the moment, social, engineering, poetic – MORAL...George Lakoff believes that he can tie this mental language to the physical structure of the brain and its maps – 'When you think about dynamic structure, you begin to realize that there are a lot of things that are analogous with life – BUT, life is more patterns in space/time than it is a particular set of things...” Jim Jubank

Yeah, you see, these guys were SO BRAZEN, it was almost, ALMOST, just like this:

"EVERYBODY SWEARS PSYCHOPATHS can't be treated. That's a lot of hogwash,' said Joseph Fredricks, a homosexual pedophile whose long history of violence included the murder of an eleven-year-old boy. 'Psychopaths are as human as anyone. They're psychopaths because they are more sensitive than anyone.... They can't stand pain of any sort, that's why they let it roll off their backs,' he said.”

Yeah, that's how brazen they were, and ARE, all right, see:

“As Andres Serrano, who produced 'Piss Christ,' settled into a boxy bishop's chair from the 16th century, Mr. Serrano turned to the question of transgression. Some outrages, he said, simply would not stand. 'I've had parties where people spill drinks on the furniture and don't think to pick it up,' he said, clearly galled at the effrontery. 'I've had to call restorers in because of rings left by glasses...” New York Times

Yeah, you see just how “sensitive” Andres Serrano is, why, he was sooooo sensitive about his fine piece of furniture, that he purchased by producing 'Piss Christ,' that he became upset when the “artisan's,” who worked as an artisan “carpenter,” after spending (about) SEVEN years working as an apprentice, to become a “craftsman,” work was, well, Mr. Andres Serrano was very upset when that artisan's extraordinary craftsmanship was being “disrespected,” yes indeedy.

Hmm, but here's a rather amusing thing, well, because THAT particular article, above, about Andres Serrano, who produced the Fine Art Work Of Art - “ART” with a capital 'A,' entitled Piss Christ, and while obtaining Public Funds to finance the production of it, in “1987,” the PICTURE was “produced” in “1987,” well, THAT particular article, ABOVE was written in “2001,” and, in THAT article, written in “2001,” Mr. Andres Serrano said THIS:

“Mr. Serrano, 50, has never been big on explaining himself. 'I don't find the need to understand my work fully, or even to explain it,' he said - With just a hint of apology, he turned up the room's one working light, a spot trained on the center of a broad maroon brick wall. There, suspended by a heavy steel chain, hung a nearly life-size 16th-century statue of Jesus. It was an arresting sight, arms missing, a carved figure of quiet torment. Asked about the religious significance of the figure, Mr. Serrano shrugged. He'd never been particularly religious, he said: ''I just like the way it looks. And it goes with all the furniture.” New York Times

Yeah, in THAT article, written in “2001,” Mr. Andres Serrano just plain said that he Had NO religious convictions – OR ANY thoughts, PERIOD, prior to producing Piss Christ, in “1987” and which he “communicated,” in words, in REAL LIFE, in “2001.”

Yeah, but, Ol Lucy Lippard, said THIS, about Andres Serrano, in “1990,” remember:

“Since 1984, Andres Serrano has developed a complex iconography that simultaneously exorcises the artist's experiences of Catholicism, criticizes the commercialization of sacred imagery, and pays idiosyncratic homage to the ideas that Christ originally stood for..” Lucy Lippard

But she also said this, in 1989:

“...Seranno is an urban artist of considerable political sophistication – In High Art, the word 'moral' is usually considered laughable – juxtaposition is Serrano's genius, he understands that there are always certain factions that will always try to ensure that audiences don't think for themselves – his work shows that conventional notion of good taste with which we are raised, and educated, is based on an illusion of social order that is neither possible, nor desirable, to believe in...” Lucy Lippard

So, I guess Ol Andres Serrano, is suuuuccccchhhh a Super Genius, that he doesn't even have to “read,” well, ANYTHING, and, in addition, he doesn't even have to “think,” LITERALLY “anything” according to Mr. Serrano, it: the SUPER GENIUS, just HAPPENS, you know, just like this:

''For someone who doesn't work,' he said, 'it's amazing how busy I stay.''

Yeah, for someone who, ADMITS, to “doing NOTHING,” it's amazing how busy he stays, you know, DOING only THIS:

“Like many artists whose livelihoods rely on the market, Mr. Serrano is not aloof or prissy about talking money. He stopped collecting the art of his peers, he said, after he traded one of his photographs to a friend for a Ross Bleckner print that was later appraised at just $1,200. 'I know the piece I gave him was worth at least 20 grand,' he said - Combing auctions and working with two Manhattan dealers, John Gredler and Vincent Verdi, Mr. Serrano bought the bishop's chairs for as little as $2,500 each and the Jesus sculpture for $8,000 - Mr. Serrano would like to extend his collection backward, toward antiquities. 'For me, upgrading means going back,' he said. Last year he bought a Roman bust from the first century A.D. At $20,000...” New York Times

Yeah, all Ol Mr. Serrano has to do, is, well, THIS:

“Piss and Blood – Bloodstream – Ejaculate – Nun Masturbating – Bishop Defecating – Klansman – Morgue Death By Drowning – Morgue Death By Stabbing – Morgue Knifed to Death – Morgue Death By Rat Poison – etc – etc – etc...”

And/or ABSOLUTLY NOTHING, except, of course, for being a provocateur, and, then, letting all of the Church Of The Big O High Priests and Priestesses take over, and, then, let THEM do THIS:

“With their powers of imagination in gear and beamed on themselves, psychopaths appear amazingly unfazed by the possibility—or even by the certainty—of being found out. When caught in a lie or challenged with the truth, they seldom appear perplexed or embarrassed—they simply change their stories or attempt to rework the facts so they appear to be consistent with the lie. The result is a series of contradictory statements and a thoroughly confused listener. And psychopaths seem proud of their ability to lie. When asked if she lied easily, one woman laughed and replied, 'I'm the best. I think it's because I sometimes admit to something bad about myself. They think, well, if she's admitting to that she must be telling the truth about the rest' - Psychopaths are easily bored and are not likely to engage in activities that are dull, repetitive, or require intense concentration over long periods. Psychopaths see the rules and expectations of society as inconvenient and unreasonable impediments to their own behavioral expression. They make their own rules, both as children and as adults - Psychopaths have an ongoing and excessive need for excitement—they long to live in the fast lane or 'on the edge,' where the action is. In many cases the action involves the breaking of rules - Psychopaths are basically amoral. Brain scans have shown no activity in the areas of the brain governing conscience or empathy. Lacking internal controls, they will always do as much as they can get away with. That means that as society forbids less and less, young psychopaths push the envelope more aggressively. And once a psychopath embarks upon violence as a teenager, it isn’t possible to rehabilitate him as an adult. Psychopaths are born devoid of conscience and empathy. Since childhood, they have adapted by imitating normal people. But as they pretended to have a conscience or values, and faked empathy, they despised those they manipulated. By adulthood, these imposters are skilled at blending in. Because they have been brought up alongside normal people, they also know how non-psychopaths think. Thus they have an advantage over most people. They can fly under our radar, camouflaged by an appearance of normalcy and respectability. They have been pathological liars and manipulators all their lives. These days most psychiatrists concur that psychopathic patients are untreatable. In fact many are refusing to take them on, citing not only the waste of their time, but also their own need to protect their mental health. Not only do they have no intention of changing, psychopaths delight in outwitting medical staff. Psychopaths are, as Dr Hare describes them above , ‘social predators.’ They harm us at every level of our lives: governmental, societal, financial, domestic, emotional. They are ruthlessly dedicated to achieving power and control over others, which they do through charm, manipulation, deceit, violence, intimidation, bullying and cunning. Hitler was a psychopath. Ted Bundy was another. So was Bernie Madoff...”

YEAH BABY – LET THE GOOD TIMES ROLL.

Because, when Ol Pablo Picasso, put THIS:

http://cubismsite.com/analytical-cubism/

In front of the entire world, and the ENTIRE world said:”Hey wait a minute, according to the 'rules' of reality,' of 'pictorial cognition,' of 'pictorial communication,' you are COMMUNICATING absolutely NOTHING,” except for THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxNnUU3eRD0

And, THIS:

“Candace Pert: We've measure opiate receptors in everything from fruit fly heads to human brains. Even unicellular organisms have peptides – they're little robots that go for sugar at all costs, and away from salt...”

Well, then, the High Priests and Priestesses of The Church Of The Big O, simply said, well:

“Pablo Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon ushered in a revolution - This landmark painting had broken all of the traditional rules that artists at the time followed - Picasso had decided to turn his back on a fixed point of view...”

WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING RULES!!!

And the rest of the world said:”Uh, yeah I'm pretty sure you do.”

So then the High Priests and Priestesses of The Church Of The Big O said, this:

“Perhaps we can say that Pablo Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon ushered in a revolutionary way of depicting reality. This landmark painting had broken all of the traditional rules that artists at the time followed, especially the one that defined art as imitation rather than creation. Picasso had decided to turn his back on a fixed point of view...”

Heck, we'll “Make up our own rules.”

And then the rest of the world said:”Uh, well...I don't think...”

And then the High Priests and Priestesses said, 'Alright, here you go:'

“In early 1910, director D. W. Griffith was sent by the Biograph Company to the west coast with his acting troupe, consisting of actors Blanche Sweet, Lillian Gish, Mary Pickford, Lionel Barrymore and others. They started filming on a vacant lot near Georgia Street in downtown Los Angeles - Within a few years, ambitious men like Samuel Goldwyn, William Fox, Carl Laemmle, Adolph Zukor, Louis B. Mayer, and the Warner Brothers had switched to the production side of the business. Soon they were the heads of a new kind of enterprise: the movie studio - At motion pictures' height of popularity in the mid-1940s, the studios were cranking out a total of about 400 movies a year, seen by an audience of 90 million Americans per week - Sound became widely used in the late 1920s - Throughout the 1930s, as well as most of the golden age, MGM dominated the film screen and had the top stars in Hollywood, and was also credited for creating the Hollywood star system altogether - Many film historians have remarked upon the many great works of cinema that emerged from this period of highly regimented film-making...” Wikipedia

And then the people said:'Okie dokie...'

And, then, The High Priests and Priestesses put the world to sleep:

“First of all when you're watching movies or television the higher brain regions, like the midbrain and neocortex, are shut down, and most activity shifts to the lower regions – like the limpic system. The neurological processes that take place in this region can hardly be called 'cognitive.' Moreover, these lower regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images, or fantasy – so people react to movie and television content as though it were real. Studies have proven that, in the long run, too much activity in the lower brain leads to atrophy in the higher brain regions – Watching television puts the viewer in a highly suggestible, and deep hypnotic state – This provides easy access to the subconscious, and is one on the reasons people fall asleep easily while watching television....”

And everyone was happy, or, rather, delirious, just like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpwUts09F5g

So, anyways, let me explain a part of pictorial cognition that no one knows exists yet, because, everyone, knows THIS:

“From about the age of three, the child begins to circles and lines to make simple figures. At first, people are drawn without a body and with arms emerging directly from the head. The eyes are often drawn large, filling up most of the face, and hands and feet are omitted, or drawn disproportionately, and, at this stage, it may be hard to identify the subject without the child's help – At this stage, children are not yet capable of producing a realistic picture..” Wikipedia.

Functioning in conjunction with our understanding, of THIS:

“At birth a baby's language of the senses is still quite primitive: he sees vague shapes, or flashes of light, but without meaning. And what he sees is flat, his eyes not yet working together to site an object three dimensionally – The child's perceptions, starting with time and space, are still quite primitive, a long time will pass before the child assumes the forms of perceptions usually found in adults. The child perceives the world unstably and variably – the child will perceive the world as a random series of two dimensional fragments...” A. R. Luria

Enables the ENTIRE world to know, that when they: The master manipulating lying psychopathic con artists, put THIS:

“Perhaps we can say that Pablo Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon ushered in a revolutionary way of depicting reality. This landmark painting had broken all of the traditional rules that artists at the time followed, especially the one that defined art as imitation rather than creation. Picasso had decided to turn his back on a fixed point of view...”

In front of the world, well, then, the ONLY thing that THAT could possibly prove, their simply saying those words, is that they ARE, factually, “PROVING,” for all the world to see with our eyes alone, that they are THIS:

“Psychopaths seem to know the dictionary meanings of words but fail to comprehend or appreciate (OR 'experience') their emotional value or significance (while functioning as if) he knows the words but not the music. Recent laboratory research provides convincing support for these clinical observations. This research is based on evidence that, for normal people, neutral words generally convey less information (less understanding of reality) than do emotional words: A word such as PAPER has a dictionary meaning, whereas a word such as DEATH has a dictionary meaning plus emotional meaning, and unpleasant connotations. Emotional words have more 'punch' than do non emotional words. Picture yourself at a computer screen on which groups of letters are flashed for a second. Electrodes for recording brain responses have been attached to your scalp and connected to an EEG machine, which draws a graph of the electrical activity of the brain. Some of the groups of letters flashed up on the screen form common words found in the the dictionary; other strings no words, only nonsense syllables. For example, TREE forms a word but RETE does not. Your task is to push a button as quickly as possible whenever you have decided that a true word has appeared on the screen. The computer measures the time that it takes you to make your decisions; it also analyses your brain responses during the task. You will probably respond more quickly to an emotional word than to a neutral one. For example, you would probably push the button quicker at the word DEATH than the word PAPER. The emotional content (and real word) seem to give the words a sort of 'turbo-boost' to the decision making process. At the same time, the emotional words evoke larger brain responses than do neutral words – When we used this laboratory test with prison inmates, the non-psychopaths showed the normal pattern of response – BUT the psychopaths did NOT: They responded to emotional words as if they were neutral words – to a psychopath, a word is just a word...” Dr. Robert

“PSYCHOPATHS.”

And, YES, they have done the EXACT same “tests” with “pictures:”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpP-nL- ... u.be&t=175

And so, in order for me to be able to do, this:

“Day of Wrath, that day
Will dissolve the earth in ashes
As David and the Sibyl bear witness.

What dread there will be
When the Judge shall come
To judge all things strictly.

A trumpet, spreading a wondrous sound
Through the graves of all the lands,
Will drive mankind before the throne.

Death and Nature shall be astonished
When all creation rises again
To answer to the Judge.

A book written in, will be brought forth.
In which is contained everything that is,
Out of which the world shall be judged.

When therefore the Judge takes His seat
Whatever is hidden will reveal itself.
Nothing will remain unavenged...” Mozart Requiem Mass

I had to, first, become capable of doing, this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-E_PQiq ... u.be&t=853

And then "write THE book," and then do this...

BUT, while ONLY “functioning” in CONJUNCTION, with THIS:

“Lying, deceiving, and manipulation are natural talents for psychopaths - With their powers of imagination in gear and focused on themselves, psychopaths appear amazingly unfazed by the possibility – or even by the certainty, of being found out. When caught in a lie or challenged with the truth, they seldom appear perplexed or embarrassed, they simply change their stories or attempt to rework the facts so they appear to be consistent with the lie. The result is a series of contradictory statements and a thoroughly confused listener - They have been pathological liars and manipulators all their lives – They will deny reality until their victims have a nervous breakdown - Often, the psychopath will turn on the victim and claim that the victim suffers from 'delusions' and is not mentally stable..”

And, of course, while EVERY, literally, HUMAN BEING, acknowledges this fact:

“Proofs are not abstract. There is no such thing as proving something abstractly – One can, of course, define a class of abstract entities and call them 'proof,' but those 'proofs' can not verify mathematical statements because no one can see them...” David Deutsch

So, now, ONLY now, with my production of a literal, mathematically verifiable, “PROOF,” the world can know that this is the FINAL “TEST,” this IS: PASS OR FAIL, and THERE ARE NO “exceptions.”

Because, when I provided THAT “mathematically verifiable proof,” I “proved,” FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE WITH OUR EYES ALONE, that a “human being,” CAN develop a level of “consciousness,” OF: “universally applicable a priori four dimensional reality,” and/or THIS:

“There are two essential yet complimentary aspects of this new vision of time that are as striking in contrast as heaven and hell. Heaven is ruled by dynamical equations that re reversible and 'timeless,' their simplicity ensures stability for eternity. Hell is more akin to the real world, where fluctuations, uncertainty and chaos reign..” P. Coveney & R. Highfield

And while functioning in conjunction with this, of course:

“The assessment of intelligence was initiated by Francis Galton and James McKeen Cattell. They had advocated the analysis of reaction time and sensory acuity as measures of 'neurophysiological efficiency' and the analysis of sensory acuity as a measure of intelligence.”

So, what that ALL means, is that, with me presenting a “mathematically verifiable proof,” of a person's capability to develop their own, human, consciousness, to the point where, any thing, yes literally ANY THING, that they “perceive,” and/or “SEE,” CAUSES A NEUROPHYSILOGICAL DISTURBANCE, within their “mind,” and, LITERALLY ANY “THING,” whether it be, a: painting – drawing – photograph – scene on a television screen – scene on a movie screen – scene on a computer monitor screen – scene on a cell phone, and/or – AND OR, a “SCENE” - OUT IN THREE DIMENSIONAL REALITY, which does NOT “contain” a “mathematically verifiable four dimensional space/time syntax,” and/or THIS:

“Asked by the Pharisees when the Kingdom of God was to come, he gave them this answer, 'The Kingdom of God does not admit of observation and there will be no one to say, 'Look here! Look there! For, you must know, the Kingdom of God is within you.” Luke 17: 20-21

Well, then, the "person" who has developed THAT level of consciousness, and/or:

"Leonardo: Do you not know that your soul is composed of harmony, and that harmony can not be generated other than when the proportions of the whole non tangible form are seen and heard instantaneously - in a single glance..."

A soul, well, then, literally - yes literally, any "thing" they perceive, which is not an actual Eternal Harmony made manifest, well then the perception of that "thing," at THIS point in time, will cause THAT “human being,” to do THIS:

“Candace Pert: We've measure opiate receptors in everything from fruit fly heads to human brains. Even unicellular organisms have peptides – they're little robots that go for sugar at all costs, and away from salt...”

Move in a direction away from it.

Because it is death.

ANY and ALL of it.

See, no one:

"Eclogite: So what are you saying, in that first post, that we don't already know?


Knew THAT, did you?
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby neuro on August 25th, 2017, 8:48 pm 

Ehi, MrMikeludo,
the length of your your posts is growing geometrically.
Do you cut and paste in each new post whatever you have written before and then add some sentences?
Or do you have a program for scrambling paragraphs?

My impression is that essentially you are offended by the idea that somebody can manage in having themselves called Artist without having any specific skill or producing anything really novel.

Couldn't you just state that?
User avatar
neuro
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 2620
Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Location: italy
Braininvat liked this post


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby MrMikeludo on August 25th, 2017, 9:48 pm 

neuro » August 25th, 2017, 8:48 pm wrote:Ehi, MrMikeludo,
the length of your your posts is growing geometrically.
Do you cut and paste in each new post whatever you have written before and then add some sentences?
Or do you have a program for scrambling paragraphs?

My impression is that essentially you are offended by the idea that somebody can manage in having themselves called Artist without having any specific skill or producing anything really novel.

Couldn't you just state that?


I'm sorry neuro, but do you know anything about neuroscience;)

What I'm saying, is this:

“It's digital heroin – How screens turn kids into psychotic junkies - We now know that those iPads, smartphones and Xboxes are a form of digital drug. Recent brain imaging research is showing that they affect the brain’s frontal cortex — which controls executive functioning, including impulse control — in exactly the same way that cocaine does. Technology is so hyper-arousing that it raises dopamine levels — the feel-good neurotransmitter most involved in the addiction dynamic — as much as sex. This addictive effect is why Dr. Peter Whybrow, director of neuroscience at UCLA, calls screens 'electronic cocaine' and Chinese researchers call them 'digital heroin.' In fact, Dr. Andrew Doan, the head of addiction research for the Pentagon and the US Navy — who has been researching video game addiction — calls video games and screen technologies 'digital pharmakeia' (Greek for drug)...” Dr. Nicholas Kardaras

Or, that early 20th century art, was simply the equivalent of our contemporary 21st century television, movies, internet, and cell phones, and, as THOSE “experts” have realized, IF we do NOT completely eliminate ALL: television, movies, internet (except for this – communication), and cell phones, we are all going to DIE – soon, very soon.

And, as you know, NO ONE is going to eliminate “ONE” second of ANY of those things, ergo...

Full explanation, tomorrow.

But, if you are a neuroscientist, you should already know exactly why NO ONE is going to eliminate even one second of any of those things, and also exactly what it would be like if any of us tries to encourage any one to do that.

Maybe you could take a guess as to exactly why?

Or, rather exactly what it was that "allowed" them to actually "confuse the map with the territory," and I mean exactly, not metaphysically, but neurophysiologically.
MrMikeludo
Banned User
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 17 Aug 2011


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby BadgerJelly on August 26th, 2017, 2:27 pm 

User avatar
BadgerJelly
Resident Member
 
Posts: 4506
Joined: 14 Mar 2012


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby neuro on August 27th, 2017, 9:31 am 

MrMikeludo » August 26th, 2017, 2:48 am wrote:Maybe you could take a guess as to exactly why?

Or, rather exactly what it was that "allowed" them to actually "confuse the map with the territory," and I mean exactly, not metaphysically, but neurophysiologically.

Money did it.
The loss of long-term perspective and the derangement of the internal system of needs by the consumer society allowed it to occur.

I do not care.
I do not know whether in English all this is more appropriately called preaching or ranting, but neither one is particularly appreciated on these forums.
Do you realize nobody is debating with you?

Either you are too clever and everybody here is dumb (and you might be contented with this explanation, consistent with the short-sightedness you seem to be condemning), or there might be a better way for you to communicate your thoughts
User avatar
neuro
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 2620
Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Location: italy


Re: Pictorial Cognition Explained.

Postby Braininvat on August 27th, 2017, 11:26 am 

MOD NOTE: The poster has received multiple requests from moderators to cease his long, rambling, and incoherent rants and "citation dumps" and make his points in accordance with SPCF formatting guidelines. The poster has not complied.

It is also not in the poster's own interest to spend so much time writing and cut/pasting material that is not being read - as other members have noted here, repeatedly.

Many web hosting services provide online venues for a blog. These may be worth exploring.

On a personal note, I strongly object to having an old quote of mine on Trump's presidency being used as somehow a bolster to the thesis that modern artists are morally depraved con artists. I do not, in any way, endorse the poster's thesis.

Good luck to him, wherever he lands in cyberspace.
User avatar
Braininvat
Resident Member
 
Posts: 5768
Joined: 21 Jan 2014
Location: Black Hills


Previous

Return to Art

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests