Alright, so we know that a human being “artisan” could never articulate any simple two dimensional pictorial communicative apparatus, and/or “picture,” by simply accessing only two dimensional pictorial representations of three dimensional tangible form mass nouns/noun phrases, such as: BILLY – SALLY – TREE – HOUSE – HORSE – ETC, and/or any two dimensional pictorial representations of non tangible form verbs/verb phrases, and so, all through the recorded history of time it wasn't:
“At the beginning of the Renaissance, painters and sculptors were still regarded as members of the artisan class, and occupied a low rung on the social ladder...” Global History – Renaissance Art
And then, in 1480, Leonardo da Vinci “Shaped the invisible:”
“Figurazione delle cose invisible.”
And introduced “Four dimensional non Euclidean projective geometry” to the world 400 years before anyone else, while simply explaining the “four dimensional function of reality:”
"Space Mach argued, is not a thing, but an expression of interrelationships among events. 'All masses and all velocities, and consequently all forces, are relative,' he wrote. Einstein agreed, and was encouraged to write a theory that built space and time out of events alone...Einstein had replaced Newton's space with a network of light beams; their's was the absolute grid, within which space itself became (manifest)..." Timothy Ferris - Coming Of Age In The Milky Way
And/or the actual “shaping of the invisible,” actually functioning as Time made manifest, and/or an actual four dimensional space/time continuum, and/or Einstein's relativity.
Now, I know that some people may be having some trouble completely understanding exactly what it is Leonardo did, and how important it was for “transforming” “ART” - “I” - “SAN,” into “Artist,” with a capital “A,” but all we need you know is, this, as Leonardo did explain:
“Mathematics is the only subject that can provide complete and utter universal truths, whereas no other subject can.”
Now, so as to not allow the subject to get bogged down in semantics, let me use this definition, and because we are all intimately familiar with it at the beginning of the twentieth century, and which is the universal function of “binary code:”
“A binary code represents text, computer processor instructions, or other data using any two-symbol system, but often the binary number system's 0 and 1.”
So what Leonardo did, was to “transform” THIS:
“CHAOS: 01000011 01001000 01000001 01001111 01010011
NOISE: 01001110 01001111 01001001 01010011 01000101
DISCORD: 01000100 01001001 01010011 01000011 01001111 01010010 01000100
PAIN: 01010000 01000001 01001001 01001110
SALT: 01010011 01000001 01001100 01010100
DEATH: 01000100 01000101 01000001 01010100 01001000
MOVE AWAY: 01001101 01001111 01010110 01000101 00100000 01000001 01010111 01000001 01011001.”
Into THIS:
“ORDER: 01001111 01010010 01000100 01000101 01010010
MUSIC: 01001101 01010101 01010011 01001001 01000011
HARMONY: 01001000 01000001 01010010 01001101 01001111 01001110 01011001
PLEASURE: 01010000 01001100 01000101 01000001 01010011 01010101 01010010 01000101
SUGAR: 01010011 01010101 01000111 01000001 01010010
LIFE: 01001100 01001001 01000110 01000101
MOVE TOWARDS: 01001101 01001111 01010110 01000101 00100000 01010100 01001111 01010111 01000001 01010010 01000100 01010011.''
Except, of course, he did it with the “reality,” and not simply the words.
And also when he did it, he was able to directly access the actual “universal language of reality,” and/or Time made manifest, and also – and simultaneously, access the “universal language of the collective consciousness of mankind:”
"The equivalent of the machine language of the brain, in (Alan) Gavin's view, is very complex electromagnetic field con figurations...(And) after several years of painstaking mapping of these physic never-never lands, (Gavin) discovered an extraordinary thing: The mind of man contains only so many visions; four recurrent geometrical forms..." Judith Hooper -The3-pound Universe.
And/or “Life:”
“One way to think about this view is to imagine spatial relationships as a kind of universal language that the brain uses no matter what specific language - social, moral, engineering, poetic, we are using at the moment...(George) Lakoff believes that he can tie this mental language to the physical structure of the brain and its maps: 'When you think about dynamic structure, you begin to realize that there are a lot of things that are analogous with life, (but) life is more patterns in space/time than it is a set of particular physical things." Jim Jubank - In The Image Of The Brain
And while simultaneously “replicating the four dimensional function of reality:”
"Space Mach argued, is not a thing, but an expression of interrelationships among events. 'All masses and all velocities, and consequently all forces, are relative,' he wrote. Einstein agreed, and was encouraged to write a theory that built space and time out of events alone...Einstein had replaced Newton's space with a network of light beams; their's was the absolute grid, within which space itself became (manifest)..." Timothy Ferris - Coming Of Age In The Milky Way
While actually functioning as “The shaping of the invisible,” and/or “Time made manifest.”
And then, from 1480 to 1880, we can simply see the “aristocracy” actually “regressing back to point time zero,” and actually admitting it as well:
“Cezanne tried to make the ultimate journey back through time – Cezanne claimed to believe in his own sensations, moreover, he said so quite categorically; 'What counts is only mass' – This is an imaginary world which Cezanne could not have seen (in reality) – It is impossible to tell – We do not know – I could not tell – I could not decide – We do not know...Cezanne created a kind of space where one technique to create depth is canceled out by another – in other words, Cezanne is the painter of the distance that seems near – This was obviously against the rule of the constant observation point (but Cezanne couldn't understand that) – Cezanne was like a lion in Nietzche's sense, and rules mattered little to him...” Yvon Taillainder
Yeah they actually admitted it, but, of course, while they: The Early Twentieth Century Modern Art Community, also, and simultaneously, adopted “Nietzche” AND “Charles Baudelaire” as the people that they – The Early Twentieth Century Fine art Art Community, were going to “build their entire foundations upon,” and, well, what did Nietzche say “Art” should be, and/or what should all “Artists” actually do?
Well Nietzche said to “lie,” and to “sin,” and to tell the world that “beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder” - AS they were “lying,” and that everyone – all of the so-called “artists,” should just “have a great big orgy” - AS they are “lying,” and telling the world they are “virtuous,” and that all the “artists” should simply consume vast amounts of dopamine inducing “narcotics,” AS they are engaging in their unbridled, lustful - “frenzy inducing,” “ORGY,” and that they – all the ”artists,” should “abandon” ALL “ethics and knowledge,” and that “Art should be the god of intoxication – orgies,” and that the MOST SUPREME “art” of all time, is to “Lie your face off,” see, he says so, right here (@ 12:50):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GS1lgwdwU&t=723sAnd Charles Baudelaire? Well, Charles Baudelaire made Nietsche look like a Girl Scout by comparison.
Because, Baudelaire simply came right out and said that:”ALL 'Artists' should simply, literally, 'sell your souls to Satan,' and allow yourselves to become Satan's minions, AND ACTUALLY SIMPLY DO ABSOLUTLY NOTHING, except allow yourselves to become lying, pig, self indulgent, master manipulating psychopathic con artists, and also allow yourselves to become capable of getting everything you want, by becoming master manipulating psychopathic con artists, and while also becoming rich and famous as well – by lying your psychopathic scum sucking pig face off, AND actually 'simply selling your soul to Satan,” and, yeah he ACTUALLY told them that, see he said so, right HERE (@ 26:30):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GS1lgwdwU&t=723sAnd so, that is EXACXTLY “what” Gertrude Stein DID, and – yeah, she ACTUALLY said it, right HERE (@30:00):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GS1lgwdwU&t=723sAnd then, AFTER Gertrude Stein literally “Sold her soul to Satan,” she simply began the actual “master manipulating” as well, and/or the actual “lying,” and then simply began her lying psychopathic master manipulation, while actually functioning as a “psychopathic con artist,” exactly explained right HERE (@16:10):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GS1lgwdwU&t=984sAnd then Gertrude Stein did EXACTLY that: She laid the foundation for effecting the single biggest, collective, master manipulating psychopathic con in the ENTIRE history of the ENTIRE world, and you want to know how we can know this ALL for a fact?
Well, you guys “testified to it,” see, right here:
“BadgerJelly: Being courteous to people does not involve calling them, and I quote, 'You lying sack of shit."
“MrMikeludo (Me): I'm a little confused, why is that NOT being courteous?”
“Eclogite: If you have to ask because you don't know then you have a problem. If you have to ask because you wish to make a point, then here are the negatives in the phrase: 1. Accusing people of lying is often discourteous. 2. Characterising them as an inanimate object is discourteous unless that object is generally valued. 3. Comparing them to fecal matter is discourteous. Why are each of these actions discourteous? Societal norms have determined that such is the case. You don't have to like it, that's just the way it is.”
See?
Alright, so you all have also “testified” to this:
“Eclogite: So what are you saying, in that first post, that we don't alreadly know?
And THAT was a “response” to THIS:
“So, essentially, this is the way pictorial cognition – and/or pictorial communication, actually works, and which is, a person draws a picture of a: BALL, and then, they show that picture to another human being, and they will have effectually communicated: 'Ball,' and/or the tangible form mass of the ball, and which is also, a: noun, and/or three dimensional tangible form mass/noun – matter. And then, after the person, and/or especially young child, learns how to draw, they can simply pictorially communicate their learned understanding of all the three dimensional tangible form nouns that surrounds us in our daily existence, such as: BALL – PLANE – BILLY – SALLY – CHAIR – SPOON – ETC., and, then, AS another human being looks at the “two dimensional pictorial communication,” which Billy has drawn, they – the human being looking at the picture, can know exactly 'what' 'it' is that 'Billy is trying to pictorially communicate,' of course.”
So then, that means that you all know THIS for a “scientific fact,” and which is the “scientific fact,” that when Pablo Picasso “produced” his “two dimensional pictorial representation” of THIS:
http://cubismsite.com/analytical-cubism/It was/is simply the literal “pictorial equivalent” of THIS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_VkZq84PiwAs a matter of fact, and, guess what?
Well, they actually admit it, see (@21:35):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANqi-LuH5j8&t=1318sAnd, of course, which is the “literal definition of brain death,” and/or this:
“Brain death: cessation of brain function. Criteria for conclusion that the brain has died include lack of response to all stimuli. Absence of all reflexes...” Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Journal
And/or having “less intelligence than an amoeba, and/or earthworm:”
“Our withdraw reflex, which causes us to pull away from a hot stove, involves only the spinal cord and is similar both anatomically and in behavior to that found in earthworms.” Dana Zohar
And, remember, everyone knows the way pictorial cognition functions, so, obviously, everyone knows that ANY picture, in the ENTIRE history of the world, which does not actually contain pictorial syntax, and there is ONLY the one, of Leonardo's The Annunciation, can ONLY be “translated” into THIS:
“CHAOS: 01000011 01001000 01000001 01001111 01010011
NOISE: 01001110 01001111 01001001 01010011 01000101
DISCORD: 01000100 01001001 01010011 01000011 01001111 01010010 01000100
PAIN: 01010000 01000001 01001001 01001110
SALT: 01010011 01000001 01001100 01010100
DEATH: 01000100 01000101 01000001 01010100 01001000
MOVE AWAY: 01001101 01001111 01010110 01000101 00100000 01000001 01010111 01000001 01011001.”
And, of course also, which would cause even an amoeba to “move in a direction away from it:”
“Neuroscientist Candace Pert: Even bacteria have a little hierarchy of primitive likes and dislikes. They're programmed to migrate towards or away from a chemotactic substance; they're little robots that go for sugar at all costs, and away from salt.” J. Hooper & D. Teresi
And so, of course, when the “modern art world,” actually “regressed back to point time zero,” and actually eliminated all “three dimensional space” from within their “two dimensional pictures,” and simultaneously produced their “fragmented cubist pictures,” they simply “turned all of THIS all the way up to 11:”
“CHAOS: 01000011 01001000 01000001 01001111 01010011
NOISE: 01001110 01001111 01001001 01010011 01000101
DISCORD: 01000100 01001001 01010011 01000011 01001111 01010010 01000100
PAIN: 01010000 01000001 01001001 01001110
SALT: 01010011 01000001 01001100 01010100
DEATH: 01000100 01000101 01000001 01010100 01001000
MOVE AWAY: 01001101 01001111 01010110 01000101 00100000 01000001 01010111 01000001 01011001.”
But that's NOT what they “told the world.”
You want to know what they told the world?
Well, they – the actual, admitted, lying psychopathic con artists, simply told the world they were the “most brilliant, and intelligent, and sensitive, people that have ever walked the face of the earth,” see:
“Why Picasso is the apex of art As another of the artist's works is sold for a stratospheric sum, the world is merely catching up with his originality and genius – Picasso deserves his divine status as (our) god...” Jonathan Jones
Yeah, and they told all of their victims, that they should ONLY be capable of “standing in awe in front of their worldly gods/worldly authoritative god figures,” and be capable of “understanding absolutely NOTHING” for themselves, and/or capable of employing ANY “talents” either.
And which, of course, means, that – as the “aristocracy” did actually “regress all the way back to point time zero” for themselves, they HAD NO CHOICE but to become completely, and utterly, reliant upon their “worldly gods” to supply them with access to ALL of their “consumable and effectual stimulus,” simply because they had NEVER developed any uniquely human multi dimensional synaptic capabilities, that would have enabled they to have become capable of “experiencing”
any “uniquely human multi dimensional reality” for themselves, and so, of course, they had no choice but to be only capable of relying upon ALL of their worldly gods, such as the “god” Pablo Picasso, to supply them with THIS:
“At a purely chemical level (just as the injection of) heroin triggers release of dopamine, so too every experience humans find enjoyable (pleasurable), from embracing a lover to savoring chocolate (or strawberries, or honey) amounts to little more than an explosion of dopamine in the central nervous system – dopamine can be elevated by a hug, a kiss, a word of praise – by exposure to (all mindless) novelty stimulus (TO ALL mass/nouns) - Dopamine exercises extraordinary power over learning and memory (AS Pavlov's Dogs proved) – Dopamine, like most biologically important molecules, must be kept within strict bounds. Too much causes the hallucinations, and bizarre ideas, of schizophrenia - Addicts brains have responded defensively and reduced the number of sites, or receptors, to which dopamine can bind, so while addicts begin taking drugs to feel high, they end up taking them in order to not feel low...” J. Madeline Nash
Yeah, their “heroin,” and while simultaneously “Exercising exercises extraordinary power over learning and memory (AS Pavlov's Dogs proved).”
So, do you all know the way “drugs” actually cause addictions, and even death sometimes?
Well I do, because I watched my best friend slowly die for his addiction, but, of course, while doing everything humanly possible to help him.
So, the way the addiction works is like this: The person begins to consume the dopamine inducing drug, and, then, IF they don't “stop,” and only continue to consume the drug, the “effect,” of the SAME drug, begins to become LESS powerful, and LESS powerful, and LESS powerful, as – simultaneously, the “drug” MUST become MORE powerful, and MORE powerful, and MORE powerful, simply to enable the “victim” to “breathe,” and which is exactly why the “addict” behaves like this:
“Dopamine is like a sledgehammer – it creates a serious behavioral disorder – Addicts, in fact, display many of the symptoms shown by patients who have suffered strokes or injuries to their prefrontal cortices (cerebral cortices) Damage to this region, destroys the emotional compass that they patients should know are unacceptable..”
Yeah, they begin to behave like “psychopaths.”
So, beings we all know exactly how “pictorial cognition works,” we can all acknowledge that when Pablo Picasso produced his “two dimensional pictorial discord,” he was ONLY behaving EXACTLY like this:
“Adolf Hitler: Fear Of Obscurity – If people had attacked us in those days, I would have been happy. For the oppressive thing was neither the one nor the other, it was the complete lack of attention we found in those days from which I suffered most – An agitator, who demonstrates the ability to transmit an idea to the broad masses must always be a psychologist, even if he were only a demagogue – For leading means, being able to move masses..” Mein Kampf
Yeah, like a “discord producing provocateur,” just like Adolf Hitler – Who could NOT experience any “harmony:”
“When He (Adolf) asked, she (his mother) bought him a piano. He studied just a few months, actual playing of the piano did not interest mother or son...” Michael Nelkin
So, as the victims of the con simply became addicted to the "heroin” that they were consuming, the effects – of course, were simply becoming exponentially worsened with each passing generation, and as they started with the “low level discord of Picasso,” and began their degenerated addiction all through the twentieth century.
So, as each succeeding generation became more, and more, and more effected, and – simultaneously, more, and more, and more addicted, all of the relative phenomena also had to become more, and more, and more exponentially “turned up,” as – simultaneously, the “addicts” became LESS sensitive, and LESS sensitive, and LESS sensitive, to MORE, and MORE, and MORE literally defined purely “discordant stimulus,” and/or this:
“CHAOS: 01000011 01001000 01000001 01001111 01010011
NOISE: 01001110 01001111 01001001 01010011 01000101
DISCORD: 01000100 01001001 01010011 01000011 01001111 01010010 01000100
PAIN: 01010000 01000001 01001001 01001110
SALT: 01010011 01000001 01001100 01010100
DEATH: 01000100 01000101 01000001 01010100 01001000
MOVE AWAY: 01001101 01001111 01010110 01000101 00100000 01000001 01010111 01000001 01011001.”
And/or purely “OFFENSIVE” stimulus.
And which is EXACTLY why, they did THIS:
“The Holy Virgin Mary is a painting created by Chris Ofili in 1996. It was one of the works included in the Sensation - The subject of the work, and its execution, caused considerable controversy in New York, with Rudolph Giuliani – then Mayor of New York City – describing Ofili's work as 'sick.' In 1998, Ofili was the first black artist to be awarded the Turner Prize. The painting was sold for £2.9 million ($4.6 million) in June 2015 - On a yellow-orange background, the large painting (8 feet high and 6 feet wide) depicts a black woman wearing a blue robe, a traditional attribute of the Virgin Mary. The work employs mixed media, including elephant dung (and) pornographic images...” Wikipedia
And this:
“Piss Christ - depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank of the artist's urine. The piece was a winner of the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art's 'Awards in the Visual Arts,' which was sponsored in part by the National Endowment for the Arts, a United States Government agency that offers support and funding for artistic projects...”
And became “pure evil.”
Remember, you guys actually said so:
“BadgerJelly: Being courteous to people does not involve calling them, and I quote, 'You lying sack of shit."
“Eclogite: If you have to ask because you don't know then you have a problem. If you have to ask because you wish to make a point, then here are the negatives in the phrase: 1. Accusing people of lying is often discourteous. 2. Characterising them as an inanimate object is discourteous unless that object is generally valued. 3. Comparing them to fecal matter is discourteous. Why are each of these actions discourteous? Societal norms have determined that such is the case. You don't have to like it, that's just the way it is.”
You see?