Was Hitler A Moron?

Anthropology, History, Psychology, Sociology and other related areas.

Was Hitler A Moron?

Postby Lomax on March 29th, 2017, 10:01 pm 

Once, sat around a table in a pub, I was told confidently and insistently by a group of people that Hitler was a genius. I felt as though I'd heard it all before, and I've heard it all again since. So I'm going to try to make the case that fortune, not intelligence, thrust Hitler to the fore, and that his leadership was often crucially hapless. I hope to hear arguments on both sides of the motion.

The night before the Munich Putsch in 1923, Hitler's two main allies, Kahr and Lossow, decided to call off the Nazi uprising. Angered with this, Hitler held them at gunpoint and demanded that they rejoin him in his march on Munich. Satisfied with their capitulation, he let them go home. The next day Hitler and his soldiers stormed Munich, but overnight Kahr had tipped off the Weimar authorities, and army and police reinforcements had been dispatched to Munich. 16 Nazis died, and Hitler himself was wounded, tried for treason, and imprisoned for years. Beside the mistake of letting Kahr go home - right after having treated him like an enemy - he managed not to notice, or receive any intelligence, that the Wiemar Republic had moved hundreds of soldiers into the city he was in, overnight.

Sebastian Haffner presents evidence that, during the second world war, Hitler knew that his health was failing and that his time was nearly up no matter what, and that this is why he was making madly overambitious strategic moves and using fight-or-die tactics, and even that some of his generals had sensed this and were merely trying to stall him.

During his reign Hitler did everything he could to centralise power upon himself, and in addition to this, demanded that his generals and high officials not wake him up under any circumstances. On D-Day, Allied forces began to close in at 9am, while Hitler slept; and nobody had the authority to make his decisions for him. When he finally awoke at midday the war was, essentially, over.

It's a myth that the Nazis invaded Russia in the winter - they invaded it twice, in June then in August - but when they did invade they made no plans for upcoming winters. Russia, naturally, was not conquered by the time winter came around, and the red army turned the Nazis around and chased them back through Europe, marking the beginning of the end of the Third Reich. Hitler finally chose this moment to follow the advice of his generals and distribute assault rifles - a new invention, vetoed by him completely over the previous years on the grounds that he didn't have enough for everybody - to his armies. Too little, too late; and all this is without mentioning the insanity of declaring war on Russia (and the US) at all, given that the strategic difficulty of fighting on two fronts was what did for Germany in the previous war.

Which is nearer the mark: that Hitler achieved (if that is the right word) what he did due to talent, or due to luck, or by happening to be the expression of much German feeling at the time? Jensen, one of the inventors of the loudspeaker, regretted his invention on the grounds that physically unimpressive men could not have become leaders of vehement movements without it. And had the American economy not collapsed in the 1920s, leading America to demand faster payment of reparations from the Wiemar Republic, the republic would not have been so furiously hated by its populace. Without Article 48, power could not have become so centralised so easily. My contention is that the thing which propelled Hitler forward is the same thing which spelled his demise - not brilliance, but simple, uncompromising, audacity.
User avatar
Lomax
Forum Administrator
 
Posts: 3305
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Location: Nuneaton, UK


Re: Was Hitler A Moron?

Postby wolfhnd on March 30th, 2017, 4:27 am 

Estimating Hitler’s IQ

https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/10/18/es ... itlers-iq/

Hitler was most likely slightly above average in intelligence. What that means in terms of competency may always be subjective.
User avatar
wolfhnd
Resident Member
 
Posts: 4072
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Blog: View Blog (3)
vivian maxineronjanecLomax liked this post


Re: Was Hitler A Moron?

Postby SciameriKen on March 30th, 2017, 5:59 pm 

Lomax » Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:01 am wrote:Which is nearer the mark: that Hitler achieved (if that is the right word) what he did due to talent, or due to luck, or by happening to be the expression of much German feeling at the time? Jensen, one of the inventors of the loudspeaker, regretted his invention on the grounds that physically unimpressive men could not have become leaders of vehement movements without it. And had the American economy not collapsed in the 1920s, leading America to demand faster payment of reparations from the Wiemar Republic, the republic would not have been so furiously hated by its populace. Without Article 48, power could not have become so centralised so easily. My contention is that the thing which propelled Hitler forward is the same thing which spelled his demise - not brilliance, but simple, uncompromising, audacity.



Funny I just had a discussion about Hitler at lunch which my friend was trying to argue that Hitler should not be totally held to blame as he was quite literally mentally ill. I think it might just be the case that he was mentally ill and his successes were probably driven by the extremely talented people that surrounded him and were to consumed with power to recognize the path they were on.
User avatar
SciameriKen
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 1120
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
ronjanecBraininvatLomax liked this post


Re: Was Hitler A Moron?

Postby someguy1 on March 30th, 2017, 9:56 pm 

He was a branding genius. He designed the color scheme, the symbology. He was a genius of crowd psychology. Clearly he wasn't a very good military strategist else he wouldn't have wasted seven months bombing London then marched his army into the Russian winter. Even if he did it during the summer as noted.

He was utterly focussed on his goal. He took lessons in public speaking, developed his ways of making a crowd share his madness. That's an art whether it's used for good or evil. I would say he was a genius in many areas of human psychology. If he'd left the war to his generals, Europe would look a lot different today.
someguy1
Member
 
Posts: 359
Joined: 08 Nov 2013
ronjanecLomax liked this post


Re: Was Hitler A Moron?

Postby vivian maxine on March 31st, 2017, 1:53 pm 

Competency, like common sense, is not the result of a high IQ. IQ tests reflect mainly book learning. Life experiences and the ability to reason produce competency and sometimes common sense, the latter which really isn't so common any more.

If a person has too much ego/pride about his genius level on a test, he will not believe he needs competency or common sense. He will simply believe his followers will do as he says because he is so smart. Too much intelligence - especially from book learning - can get us into all kinds of trouble, which his did.
vivian maxine
Resident Member
 
Posts: 2717
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Lomaxronjanec liked this post


Re: Was Hitler A Moron?

Postby Lomax on March 31st, 2017, 9:50 pm 

Thanks for your responses, everyone.

wolfhnd » March 30th, 2017, 9:27 am wrote:Estimating Hitler’s IQ

https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/10/18/es ... itlers-iq/

Hitler was most likely slightly above average in intelligence. What that means in terms of competency may always be subjective.

Do that guy's calculations adjust for the Flynn effect? If his IQ is 130 by modern standards it would be considerably higher by the standards of its day.

SciameriKen » March 30th, 2017, 10:59 pm wrote:I think it might just be the case that he was mentally ill and his successes were probably driven by the extremely talented people that surrounded him and were to consumed with power to recognize the path they were on.

Haffner argues that Hitler's generals did indeed begin to realise the path he was leading them on, but by then it was probably too late. Still, I can just imagine him using your idea as his defense at Nuremberg: "I was only following my disorders."

someguy1 » March 31st, 2017, 2:56 am wrote:He took lessons in public speaking, developed his ways of making a crowd share his madness. That's an art whether it's used for good or evil. I would say he was a genius in many areas of human psychology.

I'm curious as to the extent it can be argued he actually mobilised Nazi opinion, actually. Far-right views may have become common in Germany simply because of the economy, the rape of the country by foreign powers, and because of Germany's already nationalistic and imperialistic political climate. He did perpetuate the stab-in-the-back myth, but it was already well in circulation before he took charge of the GWP. I wonder if we have any evidence, one way or the other, how successful the Nazis would likely have been with any other member in charge.

vivian maxine » March 31st, 2017, 6:53 pm wrote:Competency, like common sense, is not the result of a high IQ. IQ tests reflect mainly book learning. Life experiences and the ability to reason produce competency and sometimes common sense, the latter which really isn't so common any more.

If a person has too much ego/pride about his genius level on a test, he will not believe he needs competency or common sense. He will simply believe his followers will do as he says because he is so smart. Too much intelligence - especially from book learning - can get us into all kinds of trouble, which his did.

My understanding is that IQ tests generally reflect spatio-temporal reasoning, which I can imagine comes in handy for military strategy, as well as economics. Anyway, in light of your post, I'd better put my books down and get out more.
User avatar
Lomax
Forum Administrator
 
Posts: 3305
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Location: Nuneaton, UK



Return to Social Sciences

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests