Energy density versus energy intensity.While reading my last post, a question popped up in my mind:
What if the energy effectiveness was related to its “density” rather than to its “intensity”?If so, it would mean that
the intensity of energy is an “invariant” while
the “effectiveness” of energy depends solely on its “density”. For example, the energy “
density” of a gamma ray is greater than the energy
density of a X ray since the gamma ray wavelength is shorter. This would mean that the
frequency of the rebounds of a gamma ray vibration is a lot greater than the frequency “rebounds” of a X ray. Meaning that a gamma ray “hits” faster (more often) than a X ray. The “efficiency” of a gamma ray versus a X ray is similar to using a “jack hammer” instead of a “hand hammer”; even though the “hits”, themselves, have the same “intensity”. It’s the frequencies of “hits” that produces the “efficiency”.
But we mustn’t forget that we have two kinds of “orientation” for energy. Which can be seen as two kinds of energy even if both are kinetic energy:
1) Towards everywhere (expansion) and
2) Towards one single point (gravitational effect).
In this sense, all other “kinds” of energy are “collateral damage”.
Regarding the “expansion” related kinetic energy, the “invariance” of energy’s
intensity would explain the “invariance” of light speed, while the “variance” of its
density, caused by expansion, would explain the different wavelengths, thus the different frequencies relating
to different “efficiencies” of electromagnetic rays.
As for the “gravitational-effect-related-kinetic-energy”,
can the “invariance” ” of energy’s intensity be possible in a gluon field (surface portion of pro or anti gluon)?
We have to look deeper into the “overall energy” of the gluon field.
Expelling “electromagnetic rays” doesn’t affect the “overall” energy density of a gluon field since those “rays” are produced (
and part of)
to the universal electromagnetic energy density by the “surrounding space”, as well as the “space” of the gluon field. All of “space” is electromagnetic.
Expelling “mass-energy” as W bosons doesn’t affect the “overall” energy density of a gluon field since
it stays inside the gluon field.
As for exchange of “Photons”, it doesn’t affect the overall density energy
of the gluon field since
it refers to the electromagnetism of “all” space itself. In fact they compose electromagnetic rays.
Which leaves us with electrons and Z bosons.
Electrons are definitively related to electromagnetism since their origin is the Gamma rays. So
it is part of the universal “space” energy.
Regarding the Z boson we know that:
Its “mass-energy” dates its appearance
right after the “Top-quark-energy-volumes”. But this appearance doesn’t occur
at the “gluon field” level; it occurs in the “
universal energy space” level which relates it to the “electromagnetic-energy” of space; meaning to Photons and to kinetic energy of “space”, meaning to electrons. Furthermore since electromagnetism affects “all” space, including space
inside the gluon field, the Z boson relates also to the quark-energy-volumes. And this is exactly what we find in our collider experiments regarding the Z boson:
In 10% of the Z-decays, charged lepton-antilepton pairs (electron-positron) are produced (universal “
space” relation).
In 20% of the cases Z decays into a neutrino-antineutrino pair (universal “
space” relation).
In 70% of Z decays, a quark-antiquark pair is produced (Gluon field “
space” relation).
Funny these relative portions of 30% related to "universal space" and 70% related to the "gluon field's space". It's almost exactly the same proportions applied to "contrary" components of our universe which gives 30% relative to "matter" plus "dark matter" and 70% relative to "flat space" or "dark energy". I'll have to look deeper into this someday.
But all this doesn’t explain “why” the Z boson
came to be.
What we can observe in previous notes is that all particles,
beside quarks, are related to “
space” and show an increase of probabilities in decays towards the “quark state”. Quarks, as we already know, are related to “Time” rather than “space”.
But the Z boson is a “neutrally” charged boson; meaning related to “Time” and “space”; and corroborating this is the fact that the Z boson is
its own antiparticle. Which means that it is an “overall” product of all “
space” that becomes affected, in 70% of occasions, by the “Time factor” in a gluon “
space” volume. Time factor, which we know, is what affects the energy
density of quarks.
The reality is that the exchange of a Z boson between particles produces
a transfer of momentum exclusively from a Top quark; and since a body's
rate of change in momentum is equal to a “net force” applied to it, we can say that an exchange of Z boson
adds or reduces the “speed” of a particle
in space.
In relation to the Z boson date of appearance,
shortly after the Top quark, we can imagine that the life-span of the Top quark
prevents it from mostly traveling at all (in fact its progression through space is “blocked” by its "mass-energy"); which annuls its “speed energy” that has to be expelled (expressed) as a “
momentum quanta” that we observe as a
Z boson. The Z boson becomes, then, the “
expelled momentum” through universal “
space”, of the blocked drifting of the “
Top-quark-energy-density-volume”. 70% of the time it doesn’t leave the gluon field “space volume” but produces a “meson-energy-density-volume”. The other 30% of the time it relates with the “space” of the gluon’s field.
Finally, in both cases of energy,
the energy intensity is an “invariant”; and in both cases, only the “
density” varies, consequent to the expansion of universal space. The basic fact is that “space” is “space”, whatever the orientation its energy has. “Space” inside a gluon field is composed of
basic metric volumes with a diameter of 10^-35 meter,
just as universal “space”. The only difference is that it doesn’t expand.
So the complete picture would be that space is the “fabric” of the universe and energy is “printed” on this “fabric”. A two dimensional drawing would show it as the following:

And this drawing helps us to “visualize” the “real” structure of the universe as having two layers of “energy”.
-The first “layer” (in grey) was produced at the Big bang occurring at 10^-43 sec. It was animated by “straight” oriented kinetic energy in all directions.
-Then appeared the gluon surface particle, at 10^-36 sec, with a contrary oriented energy called “magnetism”, animated by kinetic energy oriented “straight” toward one single point.
Both energy merge perpendicular to each other, at 10^-36 sec, when the universe had attained a volume of 10^-15 meter. This event resulted in two “effects”:
1-The universe became electromagnetic and kept its dynamism. And the basic metric of “space” continued reproducing (expansion continued).
2-The volume of 10^-15 meter delimited the “gluon’s field” that became a stabilized “space” volume.
Being perpendicular to each other meant that each “levels” of the new “composed” universe kept their proper particularity. The first appeared “level” kept being “energical active”, while the second added “level” kept being “energical passive”. We call that passive energy, “mass-energy”.
Both “space” levels were now electromagnetic and they would exchange “energy quanta” when needed. Those quanta are called
Photons.
The “expanding universal level” (first layer) was the possessor of “active kinetic energy” meaning “expressed motion” and when “motion” had to vary its “speed”, it would either absorb or expel a “motion quanta” called a
neutrino.
On the other hand, the “stabilized-space-volume-level” (second layer) possessed a definite “mass-energy”
density at its center; which would have to keep in equilibrium with the decreasing “kinetic energy”
density surrounding its “stable-space-volume”. To keep this equilibrium, it would have to “expel” quanta of its “mass-energy” from its center of gravity that we observe as
W bosons. In fact, all the mass-energy inside a gluon field
is located at the center of gravity. The rest of the gluon’s volume is simply imprinted topology.
The
Z boson is a “mass-energy-motion-boson” ejected by the Top quark when its “traveling” energy was “blocked” by mass-energy applied to its center of gravity; in fact, to the center of the portion of ripped front from back of the “traveling” gluon surface.
As observed since the beginning, the gluon’s field center of gravity is the solely important aspect of the “gravitational effect”. It is the only part of a gluon’s field that “interacts”.
The main point of all this is that our electromagnetic universe is composed of “two contrary oriented energy” superposed perpendicularly to each other and they, sometime, exchange some of their energy quanta when needed.
I’m getting a “funny” feeling. I “feel” that things are getting “clearer” in my mind, but I can’t “see” it yet. I don’t like not “seeing” clearly. I guess I'll have to "hurry" on.